Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
88sins wrote:Fagis AssWari at it agian
I want to know, what the intended purpose of said RFID tag on a persons vehicle?
Possibly for the electronic monitoring of the whereabouts all vehicles on all the nations roadways?
If so, why do they want to know where ppl going to/coming from? smells like an invasion of privacy.
How much this gonna cost John Taxpayer, when these asses braying they have to tax ppl to get the finances to run the country & get things done? It don't have more important things to tend to than that?
Who gonna maintain this?
Who will have access to this?
88sins wrote:Fagis AssWari at it agian
I want to know, what the intended purpose of said RFID tag on a persons vehicle?
Possibly for the electronic monitoring of the whereabouts all vehicles on all the nations roadways?
If so, why do they want to know where ppl going to/coming from? smells like an invasion of privacy.
How much this gonna cost John Taxpayer, when these asses braying they have to tax ppl to get the finances to run the country & get things done? It don't have more important things to tend to than that?
Who gonna maintain this?
Who will have access to this?
88sins wrote:not all are short range tho. depends on things like the power source, application, etc. I've used some that capable of transmitting data to receivers over a couple hundred feet away.
hydroep wrote:What stood out in the Newsday article was the "explain yourself to a court of law" bizness, meaning you'd be forced to retain legal counsel unless you're capable of defending yourself.
They're setting the stage fuh lawyers tuh dig out people eye.
sMASH wrote:Wait minute... if the tax is like 1000 a year, and the fine for not submitting is 500, it might be easier to just not submit, and let them keep asking to submit... and keep paying the fines instead....
*feeling like the top gear orangutan*
nervewrecker wrote:sMASH wrote:Wait minute... if the tax is like 1000 a year, and the fine for not submitting is 500, it might be easier to just not submit, and let them keep asking to submit... and keep paying the fines instead....
*feeling like the top gear orangutan*
You making some sense.
I was reading if the land dont have property, they tax you on the value..
If it has a property, they tax on the annual rental value.
So if i put up a container home? Annual rental value of said container is the flick?
88sins wrote:hydroep wrote:What stood out in the Newsday article was the "explain yourself to a court of law" bizness, meaning you'd be forced to retain legal counsel unless you're capable of defending yourself.
They're setting the stage fuh lawyers tuh dig out people eye.
Thats one possibility. not likely, but possible. seems there's more to it than that. but lawyers hadda eat ah food too
so if a female works nowhere, but has a dozen bf's that finance her lifestyle, how they want her to prove she get all she have from takin beat out from all dem different piggy? they want she to call all dem man to show up in court on d same day? is trouble fuh she after. the court accepting used condoms as evidence? that proposed piece of legislation is a joke. It's an outright disregard for people's right to privacy.
buh wait, i now remember, it wasn't too long ago some one of them politicians say that we as citizens have no right to privacy? who say dat again?
RedVEVO wrote:88sins wrote:hydroep wrote:What stood out in the Newsday article was the "explain yourself to a court of law" bizness, meaning you'd be forced to retain legal counsel unless you're capable of defending yourself.
They're setting the stage fuh lawyers tuh dig out people eye.
Thats one possibility. not likely, but possible. seems there's more to it than that. but lawyers hadda eat ah food too
so if a female works nowhere, but has a dozen bf's that finance her lifestyle, how they want her to prove she get all she have from takin beat out from all dem different piggy? they want she to call all dem man to show up in court on d same day? is trouble fuh she after. the court accepting used condoms as evidence? that proposed piece of legislation is a joke. It's an outright disregard for people's right to privacy.
buh wait, i now remember, it wasn't too long ago some one of them politicians say that we as citizens have no right to privacy? who say dat again?
.. Faris
And he also say he is a direct descendant from Moses.
Dizzy28 wrote:
Not Moses but Mohammed. Faris say he is a descendant of Mohammed.
Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 53 guests