Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
Well if the theory of evolution came out today and we realised that the premise for the theory is errant based on empirical evidence, wont same the scientific method shoot it down? So then why use this faulty theory as yardstick for the truth of the Bible?Duane 3NE 2NR wrote:yes scientists can be wrong, they also have no problem saying they are wrong. Infact the scientific method and peer review ensures that wrong information is not perpetuated.Habit7 wrote:Apart from that erroneous outworking of racism, Darwin based his theory on the claims of the simple cell, the future discovery of numerous transitional fossils, lack of knowledge of the Cambrian Explosion, homology and all life being explained by his Tree of Life diagram.
All which we know today is wrong.
You love to keep using theories as measure for absolute truth. Well if you find that incredulous, measure that up with the belief that inanimate objects can become animate, on their own. To me that is not only more incredulous but according to your personal vocabulary, that is faith, because there is no empirical evidence for it.Duane 3NE 2NR wrote:you mean like it stating the earth is ~6000 years old and dinosaurs and man roamed the earth together?
There is only one race.Duane 3NE 2NR wrote:Except that he was wrong. Many other races excel today.
Yes.Duane 3NE 2NR wrote:I disagree with him based on my personal ethical standard. Each person has their own personal ethical standard: some people think it is unethical to drink and drive while others think it is ok and do it every weekend. Does the Bible tell you to not drink and drive?Habit7 wrote:But I know you and I disagree with Hitler very strongly. I disagree with him because of my biblical ethical standard, on what basis do you disagree with him?
No it isnt, either the Bible advocates horrors against humanity or it doesn't. My opinion doesnt change that.Duane 3NE 2NR wrote:that is entirely your opinion.Habit7 wrote:Well not quite, because not only does the Bible not advocate any horrors against humanity, it is the standard by which we judge horrors against humanity and deem them to be morally wrong.Duane 3NE 2NR wrote:We might as well blame the writers of the Bible for every horror against humanity that was claimed to have been done in the name of Christianity, however misconstrued.
Well you cant speak for AdamB. The Quran advocates spousal abuse and religious genocide. Both Hitler and Muhammad called for the elimination of JewsDuane 3NE 2NR wrote:AdamB claims that would be attributed to the Qur'an and Hadith. What makes him wrong and you right?
RBphoto wrote:If you don't believe that the bible was written in England by a bunch of monks just to Please the ruling class... just consider.... where the fack Jesus found guys named Andrew, Peter, James, John, Simon, Thomas, Matthew and Bartholomew.... In the Middle East?
RBphoto wrote:Habit7 wrote:RBphoto wrote:If you don't believe that the bible was written in England by a bunch of monks just to Please the ruling class... just consider.... where the fack Jesus found guys named Andrew, Peter, James, John, Simon, Thomas, Matthew and Bartholomew.... In the Middle East?
This is the reason why some churches in the Western world are failing in their biblical mandate. They preach Jesus as a cosmic bellhop and not as a historical figure, preceded by accurate prophecy who died for the sin of those who would believe in Him as He is both God and man.
If only they would fulfill their mandate, less questions like this would arise.
Eh?
Habit7 wrote:AdamB wrote: The son existed in perfect union with himself except before his birth and after his death. After his death he ceased to exist as the son.
GOD didn't have attributes before this? Also if HE did, was unable to express them / make them apparent?
He ascended to the right hand of himself, so he has 2 right hands?
Why worship the MAN component of GOD? Was not the purpose of the man part was that he was to be killed to save the sins of man?
Megadoc, what's the RC evidence for worship of mary and saints? Remember Mary is not part of the Trinity. Are Saints worshipped because the Pope says so? (In the hope that one day he too will be worshipped)
For the umteenth time, muslims don't worship Muhammad, get with the programme...
No, His human nature died, his Divine nature did not.
Yes some of these attributes are displayed before time within the Trinity (love, holiness, righteousness), after time displayed to angels (sovereignty, wrath) and to us (forgiveness, loving kindness, love). God can create for His purposes and His glory, who are we to question.
The person of the Son ascended to the right hand of the person of the Father. If I am correct, I believe Muhammad parroted this also as your Islamic sister quoted before from the Quran, aren't you aware?
It is impossible to worship only the divine nature of Jesus. Daniel 7:13-14 prophesies of a God coming as man and ppl worshiping him. The Disciples worshiped Him as God while they saw Him in His human nature John 20:28. The doctrine of the hypostatic union teaches that Jesus is both fully human and fully divine, that there is no mixture or dilution of either nature, and that He is one united Person, forever (Philippians 2:5-11)
You can address your questions to megadoc when you see him. But likewise to bad Maryology, Islamists seek intercession from Muhammad. Which other prophet do you appeal to talk to Allah for you?
If it is wrong for Roman Catholics to supplicate to dead saints and the deceased earthly mother of Jesus, what makes it right to supplicate to your prophet?
Habit7 wrote:AdamB wrote:The son existed in perfect union with himself except before his birth and after his death. After his death he ceased to exist as the son.
GOD didn't have attributes before this? Also if HE did, was unable to express them / make them apparent?
He ascended to the right hand of himself, so he has 2 right hands?
Why worship the MAN component of GOD? Was not the purpose of the man part was that he was to be killed to save the sins of man?
Megadoc, what's the RC evidence for worship of mary and saints? Remember Mary is not part of the Trinity. Are Saints worshipped because the Pope says so? (In the hope that one day he too will be worshipped)
For the umteenth time, muslims don't worship Muhammad, get with the programme...
No, His human nature died, his Divine nature did not.
Yes some of these attributes are displayed before time within the Trinity (love, holiness, righteousness), after time displayed to angels (sovereignty, wrath) and to us (forgiveness, loving kindness, love). God can create for His purposes and His glory, who are we to question.
The person of the Son ascended to the right hand of the person of the Father. If I am correct, I believe Muhammad parroted this also as your Islamic sister quoted before from the Quran, aren't you aware?
It is impossible to worship only the divine nature of Jesus. Daniel 7:13-14 prophesies of a God coming as man and ppl worshiping him. The Disciples worshiped Him as God while they saw Him in His human nature John 20:28. The doctrine of the hypostatic union teaches that Jesus is both fully human and fully divine, that there is no mixture or dilution of either nature, and that He is one united Person, forever (Philippians 2:5-11)
You can address your questions to megadoc when you see him. But likewise to bad Maryology, Islamists seek intercession from Muhammad. Which other prophet do you appeal to talk to Allah for you?
If it is wrong for Roman Catholics to supplicate to dead saints and the deceased earthly mother of Jesus, what makes it right to supplicate to your prophet?
Habit7 wrote:I should not have stirred that hornet's nest by including that Islam part.
I went on to cite from the Hadith of the Blind Man where it supports supplicating to Muhammad. AdamB attributed this to Shia teaching. You can read up from pgs 451-452.
It seems like you were once calling the discussion repetitive, now you are jumping into the fray. Most of what you have posted there has been discussed and challenged (at least by me) so you can read and catch up to where we at right now.
marlener wrote:@ new_SPECIES,if I am not wrong I am sure AdamB said that Muhammed will intercede on behalf of certain Muslim on judgement day.
AdamB if I am wrong please correct me as I can't find the post at the moment
Prior to the Quran being revealed to Muhammad, what virtue and piety did he exhibit to warrant him being favoured and becoming "Allah's final messenger."New_SPECIES wrote:Islam rejects characterizing God in any human form or depicting Him as favouring certain individuals or nations on the basis of wealth, power or race. He created the human beings as equals. They may distinguish themselves and get His favour through virtue and piety only.
Habit7 wrote:Well I dont think anybody brought up to topic of the Hadith of the Blind Man before I did. Do you think the blind man was wrong to cry out to Muhammad for intercession?Prior to the Quran being revealed to Muhammad, what virtue and piety did he exhibit to warrant him being favoured and becoming "Allah's final messenger."New_SPECIES wrote:Islam rejects characterizing God in any human form or depicting Him as favouring certain individuals or nations on the basis of wealth, power or race. He created the human beings as equals. They may distinguish themselves and get His favour through virtue and piety only.
Habit7 wrote:Well I dont think anybody brought up to topic of the Hadith of the Blind Man before I did. Do you think the blind man was wrong to cry out to Muhammad for intercession?
HABIT7, Unlike Duane, I don't have the time to be debating the same point that has been dealt with. To attribute a hadith to Islam it has to be authentic. There were fabricated ahadith in the past that sought to undermine islam. End of this discussion.Prior to the Quran being revealed to Muhammad, what virtue and piety did he exhibit to warrant him being favoured and becoming "Allah's final messenger."New_SPECIES wrote:Islam rejects characterizing God in any human form or depicting Him as favouring certain individuals or nations on the basis of wealth, power or race. He created the human beings as equals. They may distinguish themselves and get His favour through virtue and piety only.
marlener wrote:@ Rocknrolla will respond to your post in due course,@ new_SPECIES,if I am not wrong I am sure AdamB said that Muhammed will intercede on behalf of certain Muslim on judgement day.AdamB if I am wrong please correct me as I can't find the post at the moment.@Bluefete you know that the beasts in Revelation are symbolic right! Surprise Rocknrolla didn't say anything seeing he is the one who thinks that Christian tend to take everything in the bible literally.@ Duane I keep hearing you say that the bible SAYS that the earth is 6000 years old,I know I made a statement on my view,and I know that Habit7 said between 6000-12000 years,can you quote where someone posted the bible said so I have been going back checking but haven't seen it.
Habit7 wrote:RBphoto wrote:If you don't believe that the bible was written in England by a bunch of monks just to Please the ruling class... just consider.... where the fack Jesus found guys named Andrew, Peter, James, John, Simon, Thomas, Matthew and Bartholomew.... In the Middle East?
Read the original manuscript in the language it was written and you will find out what their names really were. Jesus for example is 'Isa in arabic. This is really ignorant question, trumping this is possibly only the "We/Us" being used in scriptures as proof that GOD is more than one person.
This is the reason why some churches in the Western world are failing in their biblical mandate. They preach Jesus as a cosmic bellhop and not as a historical figure, preceded by accurate prophecy.
If the prophesy was accurate, then there would be no need for the bellhop business...
If only they would fulfill their mandate, less questions like this would arise.
So are you saying that this particular hadith is fabricated?AdamB wrote:HABIT7, Unlike Duane, I don't have the time to be debating the same point that has been dealt with. To attribute a hadith to Islam it has to be authentic. There were fabricated ahadith in the past that sought to undermine islam. End of this discussion.Habit7 wrote:Well I dont think anybody brought up to topic of the Hadith of the Blind Man before I did. Do you think the blind man was wrong to cry out to Muhammad for intercession?
So true. Christians worship their Prophet, Priest and King just as He declared Himself to be Yahweh incarnate and the Jews sought to kill Him like it was prophesied hundreds of years prior.AdamB wrote:Unlike Christians, we don't worship our prophet (Muhammad) like they worship their's (Jesus).
AdamB wrote:Unlike Christians, we don't worship our prophet (Muhammad) like they worship their's (Jesus).
Based on what is written in the bible, how old is the earth? Where there dinosaurs on the Ark?salvation4U wrote:I am studing biblical theology so take notes
salvation4U wrote:AdamB wrote:Unlike Christians, we don't worship our prophet (Muhammad) like they worship their's (Jesus).
Jesus Christ is the Son of God... to you the unbeliever he is a prophet...
John 14:6
Jesus answered, “I am the way and the truth and the life. No one comes to the “Father” except through me.
Jesus was conceived by the Holy Spirit not from any seed of man. He is the second Adam, borned to redeem man from sin of the first Adam in the Garden of Eden.
I am studying biblical theology so take notes...
I don’t know why people don’t sit down and study and not just read the bible. Study the Greek and Hebrew meanings and you may understand more.
Duane 3NE 2NR wrote:Based on what is written in the bible, how old is the earth? Where there dinosaurs on the Ark?salvation4U wrote:I am studying biblical theology so take notes
which version of the Bible do you adhere to? KJV or NASB or another?
salvation4U wrote:AdamB wrote:Unlike Christians, we don't worship our prophet (Muhammad) like they worship their's (Jesus).
Jesus Chist is the Son of God..to you the unbeliever he is a prophet..
John 14:6
Jesus answered, “I am the way and the truth and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me.
Sorry, this does not say that he was the Son of GOD.
All of the prophets could have said the same:
I am the way (leading to GOD) - follow me.
I speak the truth (revelation from GOD) - believe in it.
I am the life (eternal life after resurrection on the Day pf Judgment) - the promise of GOD will be fulfilled.
What does that have to do with Jesus being GOD or the Son of GOD? I don't know which it is because you christians cannot make up your minds.
Jesus was conceived by the holy spirit not from any seed of man. He is the second Adam, borned to redeem man from sin of the first Adam in the garden of Eden.
Oh Lord put ah hand!!
So GOD was a Holy Duality and then after Jesus was conceived, became a Holy Trinity?
Second Adam, so Adam was also the Son of GOD. He has a stronger claim because (1) he was first and (2) he had no mother (like Jesus), created/shaped/fashioned by the Hand of GOD HIMSELF!!
I am studing biblical theology so take notes![]()
You had me at:
I dont know why you understand more.
Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot] and 58 guests