Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
Redman wrote:no its regular math....its a mechanism -market sensitive and easy to assess on an annual basis.
smh
airuma wrote:Redman wrote:no its regular math....its a mechanism -market sensitive and easy to assess on an annual basis.
smh
Since you like math and the property tax so much. Would you mind clearing up some of the mystery math behind the determination of the "annual rental value" and while we at it, can you explain how it is fair for people in, lets say, Biche, to pay the same 3% residential rate as those in Port of Spain and San Fernando.
If we want better for our country, we must also support fair and proper methods for implementation!
Redman wrote:airuma wrote:Redman wrote:no its regular math....its a mechanism -market sensitive and easy to assess on an annual basis.
smh
Since you like math and the property tax so much. Would you mind clearing up some of the mystery math behind the determination of the "annual rental value" and while we at it, can you explain how it is fair for people in, lets say, Biche, to pay the same 3% residential rate as those in Port of Spain and San Fernando.
If we want better for our country, we must also support fair and proper methods for implementation!
Simple
Property in POS renting for 10,000
Property in Biche renting for 10,000
Property in Sando renting for 10,000
at that time its the same 3%
Hope this helps....
sMASH wrote:scam or not, its the law, and its able to weigh charges for non compliance, ranging from $500 fee, to seizure of assets, to forfeiture of property.
pugboy wrote:So are they supposed to return any submitted forms directly to sender or destroy them?
airuma wrote:Redman wrote:airuma wrote:Redman wrote:no its regular math....its a mechanism -market sensitive and easy to assess on an annual basis.
smh
Since you like math and the property tax so much. Would you mind clearing up some of the mystery math behind the determination of the "annual rental value" and while we at it, can you explain how it is fair for people in, lets say, Biche, to pay the same 3% residential rate as those in Port of Spain and San Fernando.
If we want better for our country, we must also support fair and proper methods for implementation!
Simple
Property in POS renting for 10,000
Property in Biche renting for 10,000
Property in Sando renting for 10,000
at that time its the same 3%
Hope this helps....
I just edited my post because I realized I left an opportunity for that kind of response. I assumed that you would understand that the question was based on the "percentage" being charged in relation to the overall cost of providing the services and the fact that our Prime Minster once had an issue with providing a school for the duwendes and parrots that live there.
Please forgive my ignorance wrt to your ability to comprehend!
shake d livin wake d dead wrote:court ruling states that it is illegal to accept property tax forms....interesting
zoom rader wrote:No need to axe the PNM tax just axe the PNM
The Commissioner of Valuations is restrained from accepting property tax forms, and citizens are not required to submit the forms.
This was the effect of the interim order made yesterday made by Justice Frank Seepersad sitting in the San Fernando High Court.
Based on legal advice, the Finance Ministry and Minister Colm Imbert had told citizens in several advisories they can continue to drop off the property tax valuation forms on a voluntary basis since the Valuation Division is bound to accept the forms.
Order continues to June 22 Justice Seepersad’s order yesterday was made after attorneys came for case management in the substantive case in which former agriculture minister Devant Maharaj is claiming the property tax documents are illegal and ultra vires. The trial dates agreed on are September 19 and 21.
randolphinshan wrote:zoom rader wrote:No need to axe the PNM tax just axe the PNM
And bring back who..Aunty Kamz and she gang ah bandit.You have to be forking insane.After the wickedness they did.
Redman wrote:There are none so blind as those who do not see
Redman wrote:Yep that's the goal.
Frustration of the process
toyolink wrote:Redman wrote:Yep that's the goal.
Frustration of the process
In light of the weak implementation process and the minister's utter disregard to get it right, the stated objective is quite achievable.
Redman wrote:toyolink wrote:Redman wrote:Yep that's the goal.
Frustration of the process
In light of the weak implementation process and the minister's utter disregard to get it right, the stated objective is quite achievable.
No argument there...But then if there is a high correlation between the political directorate and land ownership class....this will never happen.
toyolink wrote:Redman wrote:Yep that's the goal.
Frustration of the process
In light of the weak implementation process and the minister's utter disregard to get it right, the stated objective is quite achievable.
Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 39 guests