Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
brams112 wrote:You does make me laugh oui,how will they build a highway and not check on flooding?You not paying attention,there exist no other alternative route,this route was chosen as the best one.Close to my mum down south,the highway was going to pass withing walking distance to her home,it was out of line with point bypassing most of the areas that were developing.The other route was even a little further walk to the other side of the first one,it still did not align,now the one choosen is further away,but it is the better bet to connect everybody,as i said before is not one piece of roadway that they will build, is a few that will connect to the main one going various directions.If you know south there exist a power generation plant,the high tension lines ran all over,this posed a major problem as the proposed route was along this line,so they had to redo the route,now the route will follow a path 200 meters away from this line in most places.
rfari wrote:brams112 wrote:rfari wrote:brams112 wrote:Man decide to finally stop his charade,hope he don't choke when he eating as normal as he was doing when he started this foolishness.
Why u hadda be so bitter dan? He get what he was wanting all the time. Ogoar.
Why ur say boi?all now IF he was not playing foolish that segment wouldhave been already completed or close to it.
And if he didn't play the ass and it went on without an issues and during wet season, water flowing over the roadway because the culverts undersized and late at light people speeding and skidding off the road and dedding because of hydroplaning wha u woulda say? Not saying that that's what gonna happen but at least be happy that an independent check is being made to ensure that that doesnt occurkurpal_v2 wrote:rfari wrote:Nidco is practically its own person when it comes to procurement so if there is any skulduggery chances are the it may just be within nidco. I don't see any major backlash if design changes are recommended unless nidco doesnt accept it without justification. All in all its good stuff for the project and ultimately tnt
Major justification would be cost, consultants done say it have nowhere to turn that highway again and it would cost millions for them to go back in there.
Yep and he'll have to settle with that route but maybe slight design changes as necessary. Hrrm re-route is rubbish. Imo.
rfari wrote:brams112 wrote:Man decide to finally stop his charade,hope he don't choke when he eating as normal as he was doing when he started this foolishness.
Why u hadda be so bitter dan? He get what he was wanting all the time. Ogoar.
cacasplat3 wrote:please stop....for your own sake.....u really know very little, but speak a lot.....
you know when they say flooding, they aren't actually talking about the highway being covered with water because of poor drainage right?
it is in reference to the wetlands being cut-off/isolated and retaining the water, which then changes the eco system within the now flooded areas (the roads are not necessarily going to be flooded)......the majority of the culverts they speak about are similar to those you see between grandbazar and Monroe rd flyover that pass under the highway, which allow movement of water between the eastern and western sections that are separated by the highway.....rfari wrote:brams112 wrote:rfari wrote:brams112 wrote:Man decide to finally stop his charade,hope he don't choke when he eating as normal as he was doing when he started this foolishness.
Why u hadda be so bitter dan? He get what he was wanting all the time. Ogoar.
Why ur say boi?all now IF he was not playing foolish that segment wouldhave been already completed or close to it.
And if he didn't play the ass and it went on without an issues and during wet season, water flowing over the roadway because the culverts undersized and late at light people speeding and skidding off the road and dedding because of hydroplaning wha u woulda say? Not saying that that's what gonna happen but at least be happy that an independent check is being made to ensure that that doesnt occurkurpal_v2 wrote:rfari wrote:Nidco is practically its own person when it comes to procurement so if there is any skulduggery chances are the it may just be within nidco. I don't see any major backlash if design changes are recommended unless nidco doesnt accept it without justification. All in all its good stuff for the project and ultimately tnt
Major justification would be cost, consultants done say it have nowhere to turn that highway again and it would cost millions for them to go back in there.
Yep and he'll have to settle with that route but maybe slight design changes as necessary. Hrrm re-route is rubbish. Imo.
cacasplat3 wrote:this man never stop amazing me......
first the sledge hammer, then the citizens arrest, now this.......he always have me laughing.....DVSTT wrote:
rfari wrote:cacasplat3 wrote:please stop....for your own sake.....u really know very little, but speak a lot.....
you know when they say flooding, they aren't actually talking about the highway being covered with water because of poor drainage right?
it is in reference to the wetlands being cut-off/isolated and retaining the water, which then changes the eco system within the now flooded areas (the roads are not necessarily going to be flooded)......the majority of the culverts they speak about are similar to those you see between grandbazar and Monroe rd flyover that pass under the highway, which allow movement of water between the eastern and western sections that are separated by the highway.....rfari wrote:brams112 wrote:rfari wrote:brams112 wrote:Man decide to finally stop his charade,hope he don't choke when he eating as normal as he was doing when he started this foolishness.
Why u hadda be so bitter dan? He get what he was wanting all the time. Ogoar.
Why ur say boi?all now IF he was not playing foolish that segment wouldhave been already completed or close to it.
And if he didn't play the ass and it went on without an issues and during wet season, water flowing over the roadway because the culverts undersized and late at light people speeding and skidding off the road and dedding because of hydroplaning wha u woulda say? Not saying that that's what gonna happen but at least be happy that an independent check is being made to ensure that that doesnt occurkurpal_v2 wrote:rfari wrote:Nidco is practically its own person when it comes to procurement so if there is any skulduggery chances are the it may just be within nidco. I don't see any major backlash if design changes are recommended unless nidco doesnt accept it without justification. All in all its good stuff for the project and ultimately tnt
Major justification would be cost, consultants done say it have nowhere to turn that highway again and it would cost millions for them to go back in there.
Yep and he'll have to settle with that route but maybe slight design changes as necessary. Hrrm re-route is rubbish. Imo.
I mention hydroplaning in a completely different area and u ASSume that im referring to flooding on the roadway of the debe to mon desir area? Lol ok. I was making a specific point to bramms about designs not being perfect. How u feeling now? U still feeling smart?
equipped2ripp wrote:^ don't bother to waste your time reasoning... they always have an excuse to justify themselves.
rfari wrote:brams112 wrote:You does make me laugh oui,how will they build a highway and not check on flooding?You not paying attention,there exist no other alternative route,this route was chosen as the best one.Close to my mum down south,the highway was going to pass withing walking distance to her home,it was out of line with point bypassing most of the areas that were developing.The other route was even a little further walk to the other side of the first one,it still did not align,now the one choosen is further away,but it is the better bet to connect everybody,as i said before is not one piece of roadway that they will build, is a few that will connect to the main one going various directions.If you know south there exist a power generation plant,the high tension lines ran all over,this posed a major problem as the proposed route was along this line,so they had to redo the route,now the route will follow a path 200 meters away from this line in most places.
You would be surprised. the dual lane highway from o'meara to wallerfield was designed and constructed just the same way yet there are sections that retain pockets of water for hours after rainfall because of poor drainage and collapsed culverts. Most likely u eh go know that cus i sure u never pass trinicty mall in recent time. But that issa next matter. Point is u seem to think that all designs and constructions are flawless. And u mixing re-design with re-alignment. I never said that the route may need re-alignment
cacasplat3 wrote:this man never stop amazing me......
first the sledge hammer, then the citizens arrest, now this.......he always have me laughing.....DVSTT wrote:
Soul Collector wrote:No matter what side of the fence you are on, that ^^^ is good news.
There is absolutely nothing wrong with any form of transparency. This, once done properly will provide the information the govt was not willing to provide for whatever reason for the citizenry to be better informed.
If all mega projects can be done in such a manner and by extension the smaller ones in time, this is a good step forward.
rfari wrote:rfari wrote:brams112 wrote:You does make me laugh oui,how will they build a highway and not check on flooding?You not paying attention,there exist no other alternative route,this route was chosen as the best one.Close to my mum down south,the highway was going to pass withing walking distance to her home,it was out of line with point bypassing most of the areas that were developing.The other route was even a little further walk to the other side of the first one,it still did not align,now the one choosen is further away,but it is the better bet to connect everybody,as i said before is not one piece of roadway that they will build, is a few that will connect to the main one going various directions.If you know south there exist a power generation plant,the high tension lines ran all over,this posed a major problem as the proposed route was along this line,so they had to redo the route,now the route will follow a path 200 meters away from this line in most places.
You would be surprised. the dual lane highway from o'meara to wallerfield was designed and constructed just the same way yet there are sections that retain pockets of water for hours after rainfall because of poor drainage and collapsed culverts. Most likely u eh go know that cus i sure u never pass trinicty mall in recent time. But that issa next matter. Point is u seem to think that all designs and constructions are flawless. And u mixing re-design with re-alignment. I never said that the route may need re-alignment
Cacasplat, for ur own clarification see bold lest you still want to imagine what i was thinking and continue grabbing at straws. Suit urself
kurpal_v2 wrote:rfari wrote:rfari wrote:brams112 wrote:You does make me laugh oui,how will they build a highway and not check on flooding?You not paying attention,there exist no other alternative route,this route was chosen as the best one.Close to my mum down south,the highway was going to pass withing walking distance to her home,it was out of line with point bypassing most of the areas that were developing.The other route was even a little further walk to the other side of the first one,it still did not align,now the one choosen is further away,but it is the better bet to connect everybody,as i said before is not one piece of roadway that they will build, is a few that will connect to the main one going various directions.If you know south there exist a power generation plant,the high tension lines ran all over,this posed a major problem as the proposed route was along this line,so they had to redo the route,now the route will follow a path 200 meters away from this line in most places.
You would be surprised. the dual lane highway from o'meara to wallerfield was designed and constructed just the same way yet there are sections that retain pockets of water for hours after rainfall because of poor drainage and collapsed culverts. Most likely u eh go know that cus i sure u never pass trinicty mall in recent time. But that issa next matter. Point is u seem to think that all designs and constructions are flawless. And u mixing re-design with re-alignment. I never said that the route may need re-alignment
Cacasplat, for ur own clarification see bold lest you still want to imagine what i was thinking and continue grabbing at straws. Suit urself
No faith in trintoplan ex-ras?
dcom23 wrote:what i learned throughout this entire scenario is that most people prefer to deal with petty nonsense than focus on the broader picture...so issues like transperency, accountability, consultation and respect for the right of a person to protest is nowhere as important as whether somebody eating doubles in a van at night.
Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], st7 and 60 guests