Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
bluefete wrote:I now see Stuartie whispering in his ears.
The_Honourable wrote:You know... if Kamla was PM, Suruj was the minister and the EXACT situation took place, Rowley would call for the board, suruj and kamla to resign.
Rowley attempted to paint himself as a "corruption buster" separating himself and the government from the corrupt practices of the port knowing fully well that if the galicia stayed till October, or those two boats by bridgeman was successfully procured, it would be business as usual. The political conversation would move away from Rohan and the board to the "corrupt practices" by all the workers on the port including Michael Anisette and the SWWTU.
If he is this so called corruption buster, it taking 2+ years to deal with corruption at the port?
bess almera wrote:The_Honourable wrote:You know... if Kamla was PM, Suruj was the minister and the EXACT situation took place, Rowley would call for the board, suruj and kamla to resign.
Rowley attempted to paint himself as a "corruption buster" separating himself and the government from the corrupt practices of the port knowing fully well that if the galicia stayed till October, or those two boats by bridgeman was successfully procured, it would be business as usual. The political conversation would move away from Rohan and the board to the "corrupt practices" by all the workers on the port including Michael Anisette and the SWWTU.
If he is this so called corruption buster, it taking 2+ years to deal with corruption at the port?
U me friend don't have a clue about what's going on. To each his own I guess...carry on. We need more like you to babble nonsense, for argument sake.
The_Honourable wrote:bess almera wrote:The_Honourable wrote:You know... if Kamla was PM, Suruj was the minister and the EXACT situation took place, Rowley would call for the board, suruj and kamla to resign.
Rowley attempted to paint himself as a "corruption buster" separating himself and the government from the corrupt practices of the port knowing fully well that if the galicia stayed till October, or those two boats by bridgeman was successfully procured, it would be business as usual. The political conversation would move away from Rohan and the board to the "corrupt practices" by all the workers on the port including Michael Anisette and the SWWTU.
If he is this so called corruption buster, it taking 2+ years to deal with corruption at the port?
U me friend don't have a clue about what's going on. To each his own I guess...carry on. We need more like you to babble nonsense, for argument sake.
Well i'm subject to correction of my nonsense. Are you going to shed "a clue" on what's going on?
If not, thank you for your irrelevant opinion.
bess almera wrote:The_Honourable wrote:bess almera wrote:The_Honourable wrote:You know... if Kamla was PM, Suruj was the minister and the EXACT situation took place, Rowley would call for the board, suruj and kamla to resign.
Rowley attempted to paint himself as a "corruption buster" separating himself and the government from the corrupt practices of the port knowing fully well that if the galicia stayed till October, or those two boats by bridgeman was successfully procured, it would be business as usual. The political conversation would move away from Rohan and the board to the "corrupt practices" by all the workers on the port including Michael Anisette and the SWWTU.
If he is this so called corruption buster, it taking 2+ years to deal with corruption at the port?
U me friend don't have a clue about what's going on. To each his own I guess...carry on. We need more like you to babble nonsense, for argument sake.
Well i'm subject to correction of my nonsense. Are you going to shed "a clue" on what's going on?
If not, thank you for your irrelevant opinion.
Not going to get into any verbal tug of war with you or anyone on this forum. However, I’m suggesting that you gather knowledge on PATT org structure and it’s SBUs before casting aspersions on an entire workforce.
I was offered bribe to drop ferry probe*
Mark Bassant testifies before Joint Select Committee:
Published on Sep 19, 2017, 10:18 pm AST
By Ria Taitt
ria.taitt@trinidadexpress.com
A woman claiming to be the close friend of a Government official offered TV6 investigative journalist Mark Bassant a “six-figure” bribe to drop his investigation into the ferry fiasco.
So claimed Bassant, the author of the Gap in the Bridge 13-part series, as he responded to questions from Joint Select Committee (JSC) member Wade Mark on Monday night.
Asked by Mark to elaborate on his statement that he and his employer had come under fire for his investigative pieces on this matter, Bassant said: “Following the broadcast of the first piece, there was talk for quite a while by armchair journalists who sit at the radio and do nothing and by financiers of the PNM Government [who were] calling up my CEO.
“I got threats from people. I got offers of inducements. I had people witness it where somebody came up to me at a function and said, ‘Let’s make this all go away, I’ll write you a cheque tomorrow.’ And she was dead serious.
“I took umbrage to that. I was very offended. And I told the person she was with whom I happen to know, that I was not about that. Ever! And I had police officers call me and say ‘Be very careful. Yuh treading on ground that people not very happy with, because this is a lot of money’.”
Redman wrote:if he was serious Bassant would have taken the cheq-straight to fraud squad
Redman wrote:Sorry .
I certainly believe that Bassant was approached.
But why not ?
If she dumb enough to issue a cheq....she dumb enough to have to explain it and on whose behalf it was paid.
a chq with 7 zeros is plenty explaining
Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”
Users browsing this forum: pugboy and 73 guests