Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
Dizzy28 wrote:Habit7 wrote:The same crowd that cried murder for a 2 million flag to adorn the largest arena in the country, whistling dixie as ministers rolling around town in Porsche Cayenne
Despite some may say they got theirs for cheap, I wonder what is the maintenance costs on that versus a Toyota Prado or Nissan Pathfinder.
If the Ministers paid for it by themselves what the problem though. They well paid and receive significant tax and MVT benefits which all Ministers use.
Habit7 wrote:Dizzy28 wrote:Habit7 wrote:The same crowd that cried murder for a 2 million flag to adorn the largest arena in the country, whistling dixie as ministers rolling around town in Porsche Cayenne
Despite some may say they got theirs for cheap, I wonder what is the maintenance costs on that versus a Toyota Prado or Nissan Pathfinder.
If the Ministers paid for it by themselves what the problem though. They well paid and receive significant tax and MVT benefits which all Ministers use.
No I ain't talking about personal vehicles. I'm talking about Ministry vehicles with Ministry drivers under Ministry insurance and Ministry maintenance.
RASC wrote:Dizzy...Stop...
Yuh contradicting and messing your self up all at the same time.
Just...Stop!
MG Man wrote:RASC wrote:Dizzy...Stop...
Yuh contradicting and messing your self up all at the same time.
Just...Stop!
yuh tink he /she hair straight?
crossdrilled wrote:^^^^ So what about Brian Lara and Ganga? Should they have been left back too? Of all the people who went, Brian Lara gave more publicity to this than anyone else. Some of the women who got photographed with him, got front page spread on many local papers and got hounded by the press because they wanted to know if they were his new woman (they don't understand professional and platonic relationships there apparently). There was a cultural exchange, so that would explain the musicians and some of them actually paid for the trip out of their own pocket like I said.
So the minister of public utilities cannot meet with manufacturers who want to export heavy machinery to Trinidad? This has not been our first trade/dipl mission, and it will not be the last (no matter who is in power). Like I said, there are many reasons to attack the PP govt that I agree with, and even I, a former avid supporter, am critical of them, but this is grasping at straws.
eliteauto wrote:pg 5 and 6 is the healthiest and possibly the most honest amt of political discourse I've ever seen on this forum
MG Man I have to thank you for your honesty, you have said things that had RASC or myself said would have been labelled racist and or PNMite (the terms are interchangeable for many here)
crazybalhead wrote:crossdrilled wrote:^^^^ So what about Brian Lara and Ganga? Should they have been left back too? Of all the people who went, Brian Lara gave more publicity to this than anyone else. Some of the women who got photographed with him, got front page spread on many local papers and got hounded by the press because they wanted to know if they were his new woman (they don't understand professional and platonic relationships there apparently). There was a cultural exchange, so that would explain the musicians and some of them actually paid for the trip out of their own pocket like I said.
So the minister of public utilities cannot meet with manufacturers who want to export heavy machinery to Trinidad? This has not been our first trade/dipl mission, and it will not be the last (no matter who is in power). Like I said, there are many reasons to attack the PP govt that I agree with, and even I, a former avid supporter, am critical of them, but this is grasping at straws.
YUh saying lara didn't eatafood???![]()
![]()
crossdrilled wrote:$100,000,000.00
IBWTN
As he addressed criticisms of the alleged extravagance of the trip to India, Foreign Affairs Minister Suruj Rambachan claimed the People's National Movement (PNM) spent a larger amount ($9.5 million) on a similar mission to the Far East.
And the PNM government assisted the private sector representatives who went on this mission to the tune of $1 million.
Making a statement in the House of Representatives yesterday, Rambachan said by Cabinet Note No 277 of February 1, 2007, the (PNM) Cabinet agreed to host a trade and investment mission at a cost of $9,511,853.95, from February 27 to March 12, 2007 to South Korea, Beijing and Shanghai, Mumbai and Delhi. He added that a cultural contingent accompanying the delegation cost $3 million. By contrast, Rambachan said in the case of this Government, the private sector paid its way.
Also on the trip to India, the cost of the Prime Minister's official delegation was paid for by the government of India. Furthermore, the Indian government provided an A320 Air Bus for the delegation's internal travel.
To comments that the Prime Minister was away too often and for too long, he said the Prime Minister was "but a 'touch' away from what is happening at home and governance was not affected by her absence. By appointing others to act, the Prime Minister has shown that she is capable of true democratic leadership and is capable of delegation, as any true leader must".
He added that the Prime Minister's visit could have remained a State visit and chief guest of Pravasi with no other meetings, but she expanded it to a trade mission, realising that "the ability to convince investors that we are open for business is buttressed by the direct interaction between the Prime Minister and the potential investors".
He said length of the visits overseas was necessitated by the fact that the Prime Minister had to pause in London during the trips to India (and Australia for Commonwealth Heads of Government ) "to facilitate her personal health and physical well-being". He also addressed criticisms of the size and composition of the delegation, noting that "the team for India was based on the outcome of the Joint Commission Meeting held in November 2011 as well as the pre-visit by InvestTT".
For those who criticised the number of State companies which went on the trip, Rambachan recalled that the Ken Valley mission of 2007 was accompanied by delegates from six state agencies. "We did not hear questions as to why these state companies and officials accompanied the then Minister," Rambachan said.
On the criticism of the Prime Minister's visit to India, he asked: "Those who have sought to make this an issue have demonstrated no appreciation for history. May I genuinely ask: what is wrong with a person wanting to find out from whence he/she came?"
However, the Minister did not respond to one of the main criticisms coming of the trip—the Prime Minister's touching of the feet of India President Pratibha Devisingh Patil.
kevcam wrote:Suruj: PNM spent more on Far East mission
Here we go again with BUT THE PNM DO IT TOO...As he addressed criticisms of the alleged extravagance of the trip to India, Foreign Affairs Minister Suruj Rambachan claimed the People's National Movement (PNM) spent a larger amount ($9.5 million) on a similar mission to the Far East.
And the PNM government assisted the private sector representatives who went on this mission to the tune of $1 million.
Making a statement in the House of Representatives yesterday, Rambachan said by Cabinet Note No 277 of February 1, 2007, the (PNM) Cabinet agreed to host a trade and investment mission at a cost of $9,511,853.95, from February 27 to March 12, 2007 to South Korea, Beijing and Shanghai, Mumbai and Delhi. He added that a cultural contingent accompanying the delegation cost $3 million. By contrast, Rambachan said in the case of this Government, the private sector paid its way.
Also on the trip to India, the cost of the Prime Minister's official delegation was paid for by the government of India. Furthermore, the Indian government provided an A320 Air Bus for the delegation's internal travel.
To comments that the Prime Minister was away too often and for too long, he said the Prime Minister was "but a 'touch' away from what is happening at home and governance was not affected by her absence. By appointing others to act, the Prime Minister has shown that she is capable of true democratic leadership and is capable of delegation, as any true leader must".
He added that the Prime Minister's visit could have remained a State visit and chief guest of Pravasi with no other meetings, but she expanded it to a trade mission, realising that "the ability to convince investors that we are open for business is buttressed by the direct interaction between the Prime Minister and the potential investors".
He said length of the visits overseas was necessitated by the fact that the Prime Minister had to pause in London during the trips to India (and Australia for Commonwealth Heads of Government ) "to facilitate her personal health and physical well-being". He also addressed criticisms of the size and composition of the delegation, noting that "the team for India was based on the outcome of the Joint Commission Meeting held in November 2011 as well as the pre-visit by InvestTT".
For those who criticised the number of State companies which went on the trip, Rambachan recalled that the Ken Valley mission of 2007 was accompanied by delegates from six state agencies. "We did not hear questions as to why these state companies and officials accompanied the then Minister," Rambachan said.
On the criticism of the Prime Minister's visit to India, he asked: "Those who have sought to make this an issue have demonstrated no appreciation for history. May I genuinely ask: what is wrong with a person wanting to find out from whence he/she came?"
However, the Minister did not respond to one of the main criticisms coming of the trip—the Prime Minister's touching of the feet of India President Pratibha Devisingh Patil.
http://www.trinidadexpress.com/news/Sur ... 99928.html
pioneer wrote:kevcam wrote:Suruj: PNM spent more on Far East mission
Here we go again with BUT THE PNM DO IT TOO...As he addressed criticisms of the alleged extravagance of the trip to India, Foreign Affairs Minister Suruj Rambachan claimed the People's National Movement (PNM) spent a larger amount ($9.5 million) on a similar mission to the Far East.
And the PNM government assisted the private sector representatives who went on this mission to the tune of $1 million.
Making a statement in the House of Representatives yesterday, Rambachan said by Cabinet Note No 277 of February 1, 2007, the (PNM) Cabinet agreed to host a trade and investment mission at a cost of $9,511,853.95, from February 27 to March 12, 2007 to South Korea, Beijing and Shanghai, Mumbai and Delhi. He added that a cultural contingent accompanying the delegation cost $3 million. By contrast, Rambachan said in the case of this Government, the private sector paid its way.
Also on the trip to India, the cost of the Prime Minister's official delegation was paid for by the government of India. Furthermore, the Indian government provided an A320 Air Bus for the delegation's internal travel.
To comments that the Prime Minister was away too often and for too long, he said the Prime Minister was "but a 'touch' away from what is happening at home and governance was not affected by her absence. By appointing others to act, the Prime Minister has shown that she is capable of true democratic leadership and is capable of delegation, as any true leader must".
He added that the Prime Minister's visit could have remained a State visit and chief guest of Pravasi with no other meetings, but she expanded it to a trade mission, realising that "the ability to convince investors that we are open for business is buttressed by the direct interaction between the Prime Minister and the potential investors".
He said length of the visits overseas was necessitated by the fact that the Prime Minister had to pause in London during the trips to India (and Australia for Commonwealth Heads of Government ) "to facilitate her personal health and physical well-being". He also addressed criticisms of the size and composition of the delegation, noting that "the team for India was based on the outcome of the Joint Commission Meeting held in November 2011 as well as the pre-visit by InvestTT".
For those who criticised the number of State companies which went on the trip, Rambachan recalled that the Ken Valley mission of 2007 was accompanied by delegates from six state agencies. "We did not hear questions as to why these state companies and officials accompanied the then Minister," Rambachan said.
On the criticism of the Prime Minister's visit to India, he asked: "Those who have sought to make this an issue have demonstrated no appreciation for history. May I genuinely ask: what is wrong with a person wanting to find out from whence he/she came?"
However, the Minister did not respond to one of the main criticisms coming of the trip—the Prime Minister's touching of the feet of India President Pratibha Devisingh Patil.
http://www.trinidadexpress.com/news/Sur ... 99928.html
Same minister who said reshmi ramnarine has a degree in IT from UWI when UWI had no record of her ever attending.
Yeah, we believe you
pioneer wrote:So they're making the already rich even richer.
What are the plans for equitable distribution?
Do they realize there is a large proportion of the population that is unemployed and in some cases underemployed?
Or are they gonna continue to pay back their financiers?
eliteauto wrote:wait is try UML trying to use the private sector non-PP work of Rituals' expansion to big up the Gov't?
teems1 wrote:pioneer wrote:So they're making the already rich even richer.
What are the plans for equitable distribution?
Do they realize there is a large proportion of the population that is unemployed and in some cases underemployed?
Or are they gonna continue to pay back their financiers?
last i checked trinidad was a capitalist democracy.
as far as the government is concerned they're there to grant you proper education, healthcare, security, infrastructure etc. the rest is up to you and whatever ambition you possess to go out in the working world and make your own money.
the handout mentality, where those who do little or no work want the same rewards and benefits as those who do all the work, is what has trinidad in this giant mess.
UML wrote:eliteauto wrote:wait is try UML trying to use the private sector non-PP work of Rituals' expansion to big up the Gov't?
didnt officials of the private sector accompany the PM on the trip????
Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Duane 3NE 2NR, Google [Bot] and 73 guests