Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
Maybe he's just not on tuner long enough to realise how ZR operates. As 'racist' as his posts may be, the statistics speaks for themselves.De Dragon wrote:Zr need to lend/give some herb to OJT elec, he real eating up heself![]()
![]()
Redman wrote:It don't have to be great.
At this time it just better than the UNC.
Granted that is a low bar.
Redman wrote:It don't have to be great.
At this time it just better than the UNC.
Granted that is a low bar.
Renuka Singh
National Security Minister Stuart Young is denying that some citizens linked to People's National Movement councillors are being allowed private access to him and the border exemption process.
The question of line-jumping favours came up after a short video clip surfaced on social media yesterday showing Young talking to a woman who asked about an exemption to return home.
The video call was facilitated through a councillor for the party, who was also on the call.
Young yesterday labelled the fallout and reaction to the video clip as "UNC mischief."
The short video clip circulating on social media purportedly shows him directing a female caller to liaise with a PNM member to obtain an exemption to return to Trinidad and Tobago.
In the short clip, which was widely shared on social media yesterday and garnered some negative commentary, the woman tells Young that she's been out of the country, in Turks and Caicos, since December 2019 and could not get an exemption to return home due to the closure of the borders because of the COVID-19 virus. She said she had applied as soon as the Government announced exemption protocols but still had not heard anything.
In the clip, Young apologises to the woman for the wait and asked her if she applied under the new system. He then asks her the route she would take to get home.
Young eventually confirms that the woman has the councillor's information and directs her to send her travel information to the councillor, who in turn would then forward that to Young. The clip ends at that point.
However, Young yesterday dismissed the clip as "mischief" from the United National Congress. He said on March 8 he accepted an invitation to address a virtual meeting with the constituency of Arouca/Maloney and this is where the matter was raised.
"It has been drawn to my attention that the UNC and its supporters are circulating a video clip of a question asked of me during the course of the virtual meeting, where an individual participating in the said meeting used the opportunity to ask me about her application for an exemption to enter Trinidad and Tobago," Young said.
Young said he has not granted that caller an exemption as yet, adding he is often "approached by hundreds of persons requesting that consideration be given to their applications for exemptions to enter Trinidad and Tobago."
"These personal approaches are made via email, text messages, WhatsApp messages, pre-action protocol letters, letters (including letters from Members of Parliament, both the UNC and the PNM), telephone calls and even physically stopping me in public and making such requests for exemption to enter Trinidad and Tobago," Young said.
He said as has been stated from the first day that T&T's borders were closed, "every request for exemption to enter Trinidad and Tobago is considered on a case by case basis."
"This particular incident, where a request was made of me, for an exemption to enter Trinidad and Tobago, in the said virtual meeting by a person, is no different to the hundreds of requests made of me and has received no different treatment. In fact, to date, this particular application (request) has not been approved," Young said.
"Accordingly, once again, I am compelled to reject the mischief and desperation of the UNC and to reassure the people of Trinidad and Tobago, whom I serve, that I stay true to my oath of office. I will continue to do my best to serve the population of my beloved country."
zoom rader wrote:Renuka Singh
National Security Minister Stuart Young is denying that some citizens linked to People's National Movement councillors are being allowed private access to him and the border exemption process.
The question of line-jumping favours came up after a short video clip surfaced on social media yesterday showing Young talking to a woman who asked about an exemption to return home.
The video call was facilitated through a councillor for the party, who was also on the call.
Young yesterday labelled the fallout and reaction to the video clip as "UNC mischief."
The short video clip circulating on social media purportedly shows him directing a female caller to liaise with a PNM member to obtain an exemption to return to Trinidad and Tobago.
In the short clip, which was widely shared on social media yesterday and garnered some negative commentary, the woman tells Young that she's been out of the country, in Turks and Caicos, since December 2019 and could not get an exemption to return home due to the closure of the borders because of the COVID-19 virus. She said she had applied as soon as the Government announced exemption protocols but still had not heard anything.
In the clip, Young apologises to the woman for the wait and asked her if she applied under the new system. He then asks her the route she would take to get home.
Young eventually confirms that the woman has the councillor's information and directs her to send her travel information to the councillor, who in turn would then forward that to Young. The clip ends at that point.
However, Young yesterday dismissed the clip as "mischief" from the United National Congress. He said on March 8 he accepted an invitation to address a virtual meeting with the constituency of Arouca/Maloney and this is where the matter was raised.
"It has been drawn to my attention that the UNC and its supporters are circulating a video clip of a question asked of me during the course of the virtual meeting, where an individual participating in the said meeting used the opportunity to ask me about her application for an exemption to enter Trinidad and Tobago," Young said.
Young said he has not granted that caller an exemption as yet, adding he is often "approached by hundreds of persons requesting that consideration be given to their applications for exemptions to enter Trinidad and Tobago."
"These personal approaches are made via email, text messages, WhatsApp messages, pre-action protocol letters, letters (including letters from Members of Parliament, both the UNC and the PNM), telephone calls and even physically stopping me in public and making such requests for exemption to enter Trinidad and Tobago," Young said.
He said as has been stated from the first day that T&T's borders were closed, "every request for exemption to enter Trinidad and Tobago is considered on a case by case basis."
"This particular incident, where a request was made of me, for an exemption to enter Trinidad and Tobago, in the said virtual meeting by a person, is no different to the hundreds of requests made of me and has received no different treatment. In fact, to date, this particular application (request) has not been approved," Young said.
"Accordingly, once again, I am compelled to reject the mischief and desperation of the UNC and to reassure the people of Trinidad and Tobago, whom I serve, that I stay true to my oath of office. I will continue to do my best to serve the population of my beloved country."
Young gets exposed for exemptions .
This idiot says case by case basis by Rowliar princess and a foreigner comes and goes as they pleases
Habit7 wrote:I am waiting to hear how bad this plant is for T&T.
Because in the red government its the small men that controls the daily doings and running.16 cycles wrote:why direct to a party councilor rather than an officer in the MoNS?
But ent you all sold the blimps and MV Panorama for scraps ?Redman wrote:Yeah smash...we should have sold it for scrap.
Redman wrote:Yeah smash...we should have sold it for scrap.
sMASH wrote:The plant not bad,
Is jess that it built with tax and dole off fir pennies on the dollar for a private entity to real the rewards, like iscott, ttmc, tringen..
But dragon had pinged that out earlier.
Typical pnm modus operandi.Habit7 wrote:I am waiting to hear how bad this plant is for T&T.
zoom rader wrote:But ent you all sold the blimps and MV Panorama for scraps ?Redman wrote:Yeah smash...we should have sold it for scrap.
I needed you to show how wise a decision was made in selling those non cost effective Blimps. A wise choice was made in selling those blimps since it was not cost effective to maintain them.Habit7 wrote:sMASH wrote:The plant not bad,
Is jess that it built with tax and dole off fir pennies on the dollar for a private entity to real the rewards, like iscott, ttmc, tringen..
But dragon had pinged that out earlier.
Typical pnm modus operandi.Habit7 wrote:I am waiting to hear how bad this plant is for T&T.
"NiQuan reached final agreement on the commercial terms and all other outstanding issues on or about August 5, 2015. The proposal was accepted by the Board of Directors and the transaction was subsequently sanctioned by the Minister of Finance, (Corporation Sole)."
https://www.energy.gov.tt/wp-content/up ... roject.pdfzoom rader wrote:But ent you all sold the blimps and MV Panorama for scraps ?Redman wrote:Yeah smash...we should have sold it for scrap.
Blimp sold in 2012 http://spotlight.lunabyte.io/2018/09/05 ... -us-50000/
MV Panorama sold in 2010 https://trinidadexpress.com/news/local/ ... dd3ed.html
All these sales were done by the PP 2010-2015. But smash and ZR lying that PNM did it and it was bad. And now in the face of me showing them that the UNC did it, they will not criticise the UNC about it but will deflect to something else.
Redman wrote:Goalpost change
Redirect Zoombindranath....redirect
Check and checkmate sonRedman wrote:So you spew crap to gain brownie points on an anonymous forum.
Are you 12 years old?
Habit7 wrote:Nice!
You doh fed up getting beat up ?Habit7 wrote:Ok smash, your turn!
Ha you got caught, you own presentation showed how a bad decision was made by the red government in buying blimps toys. Everyone can read and see the breakdown of the initial cost and maintenance of these white elephants
Habit7 wrote:sMASH wrote:The plant not bad,
Is jess that it built with tax and dole off fir pennies on the dollar for a private entity to real the rewards, like iscott, ttmc, tringen..
But dragon had pinged that out earlier.
Typical pnm modus operandi.Habit7 wrote:I am waiting to hear how bad this plant is for T&T.
"NiQuan reached final agreement on the commercial terms and all other outstanding issues on or about August 5, 2015. The proposal was accepted by the Board of Directors and the transaction was subsequently sanctioned by the Minister of Finance, (Corporation Sole)."
https://www.energy.gov.tt/wp-content/up ... roject.pdfzoom rader wrote:But ent you all sold the blimps and MV Panorama for scraps ?Redman wrote:Yeah smash...we should have sold it for scrap.
Blimp sold in 2012 http://spotlight.lunabyte.io/2018/09/05 ... -us-50000/
MV Panorama sold in 2010 https://trinidadexpress.com/news/local/ ... dd3ed.html
All these sales were done by the PP 2010-2015. But smash and ZR lying that PNM did it and it was bad. And now in the face of me showing them that the UNC did it, they will not criticise the UNC about it but will deflect to something else.
Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot] and 79 guests