Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
drchaos wrote:He not getting that most Trini people don't pay FL sate tax as there are ways around it ...
Even when ordering online.
Silly Habbit ... paying FL state tax is for kids.
drchaos wrote:He not getting that most Trini people don't pay FL sate tax as there are ways around it ...
Even when ordering online.
Silly Habbit ... paying FL state tax is for kids.
eliteauto wrote:lol @ De Beatup, man does criticise the exact thing he does, poor fella getting worse as time goes by
eliteauto wrote:This for a salty guy who counts doubles men money as a hobby and totes yup too funny indeed
drchaos wrote:Yeah boy .. why has the PNM who opened so strongly against corruption not really doing anything to prevent the past from happening?
With the amount they had to say about the last corrupt regime you would expect that dealing with corruption should be number 1 on their list. At least level some charges or go after some people ...
De Dragon wrote:drchaos wrote:Yeah boy .. why has the PNM who opened so strongly against corruption not really doing anything to prevent the past from happening?
With the amount they had to say about the last corrupt regime you would expect that dealing with corruption should be number 1 on their list. At least level some charges or go after some people ...
When your very existence as the Government was largely predicated on one of the most infamous instances of corruption and fraud, namely Email Gate, it is somewhat hard to have the moral standing to go after corruption. Thus they will bray every few days about this contract, and this Ministry, mostly to appease their clueless support base. At the end of the day, they will do absolutely nothing of any significance because their intention is to play that forgiveness card at some point in the future, knowing that they intend to move in the same corrupt manner.
Habit7 wrote:Allyuh men is the greatest.
A man ask how govt going and fund Couva Hospital. You show him govt say online tax, they say it is stupidness. Increase health surcharge they say...average worker pays $33-41.25 per month in health surcharge. If the $300m needed to run the single Couva hospital was split throughout our 623,000 labour force, that would be $480 increase in health surcharge (1400%). So he prefers to throw the new running cost of one hospital on the backs of workers, than to use a consumption tax on luxury items which mostly middle and upper class consume.
Then the other one De Beatup, in one thread complaining about how govt shutting down PP projects, but in this thread complain that govt running up debt with these PP projects. Uninformed as usual that all three new hospitals were secured by loans thanks to the PP govt, but crying that PNM should reduce expenditure.
I am not defending PNM, I am defending common sense. To believe that health surcharge is enough to run one general hospital, let alone 5, I have some beachfront property in Tabaquite for sale to you. And to claim that building new hospitals is extravagant spending, whether PNM or UNC, I am sorry for the home you run.
drchaos wrote:An increase on health surcharge is a know much more steady level of income where as a consumption tax is not as predictable ...
Only Habbit will get chain up to buy "beach front" property in Tabaquite and build a house without a foundation seeing his mistake he trying to sell.
This country is run and will continue to be run on the working class ... thats how all countries work.
Now we just hadda wait for Habbit to look chupid trying to justify why Rowley and Tanty Kams needs a raise.
De Dragon wrote:Habit7 wrote:Allyuh men is the greatest.
A man ask how govt going and fund Couva Hospital. You show him govt say online tax, they say it is stupidness. Increase health surcharge they say...average worker pays $33-41.25 per month in health surcharge. If the $300m needed to run the single Couva hospital was split throughout our 623,000 labour force, that would be $480 increase in health surcharge (1400%). So he prefers to throw the new running cost of one hospital on the backs of workers, than to use a consumption tax on luxury items which mostly middle and upper class consume.
Then the other one De Beatup, in one thread complaining about how govt shutting down PP projects, but in this thread complain that govt running up debt with these PP projects. Uninformed as usual that all three new hospitals were secured by loans thanks to the PP govt, but crying that PNM should reduce expenditure.
I am not defending PNM, I am defending common sense. To believe that health surcharge is enough to run one general hospital, let alone 5, I have some beachfront property in Tabaquite for sale to you. And to claim that building new hospitals is extravagant spending, whether PNM or UNC, I am sorry for the home you run.
Firstly, take your facking time with that home reference. I have never reached to guttersnipe levels by mentioning your family no matter how heated our disagreements get. You know absolutely nothing about me, my family or my facking home.
Secondly only fools would borrow money or spend more money on projects that they cannot afford(note the difference between fund and afford as the PNM seems clueless here again). Guess what the PNM is hell bent on doing both. We have existed for years without these hospitals, and it is absolute folly to be talking two additional hospitals, when by the PNM's own admission, they cannot fund Couva.
Repeatedly PNM people feel if something can be funded, or a loan gotten, then we must do that never mind the additional billions in debt we are racking up. Then again according to Habit7, these international lending agencies are all altruistic and lend us money because they like us and want to simply help us out of a jam
drchaos wrote:An increase on health surcharge is a know much more steady level of income where as a consumption tax is not as predictable ....
Pirate wrote:Corruption in public office needs to be made a criminal offence. That way we will have the revolving door syndrome where every 5 yrs another set in office repeating itself over and over while the citizens keep expecting something better...
Habit7 wrote:drchaos wrote:An increase on health surcharge is a know much more steady level of income where as a consumption tax is not as predictable ....
So 302,000 ppl, about half the labour force, earns less than $6000 a month. You propose rather than getting 7% off of your $3000 phone, those <$6000 salary workers should have their health surcharge increase from $33 to $514?
Habit7 wrote:De Dragon wrote:Habit7 wrote:Allyuh men is the greatest.
A man ask how govt going and fund Couva Hospital. You show him govt say online tax, they say it is stupidness. Increase health surcharge they say...average worker pays $33-41.25 per month in health surcharge. If the $300m needed to run the single Couva hospital was split throughout our 623,000 labour force, that would be $480 increase in health surcharge (1400%). So he prefers to throw the new running cost of one hospital on the backs of workers, than to use a consumption tax on luxury items which mostly middle and upper class consume.
Then the other one De Beatup, in one thread complaining about how govt shutting down PP projects, but in this thread complain that govt running up debt with these PP projects. Uninformed as usual that all three new hospitals were secured by loans thanks to the PP govt, but crying that PNM should reduce expenditure.
I am not defending PNM, I am defending common sense. To believe that health surcharge is enough to run one general hospital, let alone 5, I have some beachfront property in Tabaquite for sale to you. And to claim that building new hospitals is extravagant spending, whether PNM or UNC, I am sorry for the home you run.
Firstly, take your facking time with that home reference. I have never reached to guttersnipe levels by mentioning your family no matter how heated our disagreements get. You know absolutely nothing about me, my family or my facking home.
Secondly only fools would borrow money or spend more money on projects that they cannot afford(note the difference between fund and afford as the PNM seems clueless here again). Guess what the PNM is hell bent on doing both. We have existed for years without these hospitals, and it is absolute folly to be talking two additional hospitals, when by the PNM's own admission, they cannot fund Couva.
Repeatedly PNM people feel if something can be funded, or a loan gotten, then we must do that never mind the additional billions in debt we are racking up. Then again according to Habit7, these international lending agencies are all altruistic and lend us money because they like us and want to simply help us out of a jam
De King of Beat up, nobody is referencing individuals in your home, it is referencing you.
For the umpteen time uninformed one, the PP govt borrowed money for the construction of the Couva, Arima and Point Fortin Hospitals. Only about 15% was paid as a down payment and the rest would be funded by the lender. One hospital is complete, now the PNM govt have to pay to run it, the govt proposed the online tax. Two years from now when the others are finished then they will have to fund the running of it by some other means or our revenues might go up. But as it stands the lender is funding the construction, no us.
The last PNM govt reduced our debt to GDP ratio, the last govt sent it up by 15 about points.
Please inform yourself before you speak, and relax and talk with a clear mind.
desifemlove wrote:Pirate wrote:Corruption in public office needs to be made a criminal offence. That way we will have the revolving door syndrome where every 5 yrs another set in office repeating itself over and over while the citizens keep expecting something better...
it already is. you tink fraud, misppropriation iz already legal? issue maybe is detection, and too many PNM AND UNC sycophants looking to cover up any bobol dey "leaders" does do...
Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Duane 3NE 2NR, pugboy, Syberfraggle and 231 guests