Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
Casper23 wrote:I want to see official Google documentation that those emails are fake,that should not be hard to acquire
rfari wrote:Who rewriting dey script for the big rally weekend?
UML wrote:Did the letter state it was unanimously decided to be false?
U will always have sour grapes sleeper cells!!
If three out of five agree that is a majority
eliteauto wrote:UML wrote:eliteauto wrote:so anyone in disagreement with the Gov't is PNM UML?
50 years in govt is not easily changed!
but Justice Ventour didn't disagree with the Gov't so what is the basis of your accusation?
Redman wrote:this faaawwwwkeeeeeen place sweeet too bad.
UML wrote:Cah blame him nah, I wud do the same for $5 million and the Presidency
Redman wrote:UML wrote:Cah blame him nah, I wud do the same for $5 million and the Presidency
yet yuh settle fuh 300 and a blackberry
UML wrote:Cah blame him nah, I wud do the same for $5 million and the Presidency
Casper23 wrote:Its only when you're guilty u try to compromise an investigation, common sense...
UML wrote:Cah blame him nah, I wud do the same for $5 million and the Presidency
Redman wrote:So wait nah....
If KPB read the IC letter into Parliament-she supposed to get the same treatment as Rowley??
RASC wrote:If you innocent why stress?
Allam Karim wrote:
DOUBLE STANDARDS BY THE DPP AND POLICE
I’m very concerned of the different standards being applied by the DPP Office when it comes to investigating members of the government compared to members of the PNM.
In the Guanapo Church issue, DPP Gaspard stated Mr. Manning, Mr. Hart nor Ms. Pena were interviewed because “the Judges Rules legally prohibit the police from treating them as suspects, since the police appear not to have any evidence which would afford reasonable grounds for suspecting that they may have committed any offence”
That is in spite of overwhelming evidence to the contrary, even DPP Gaspard stated Mr. Manning had a vested interest in the Church, he visited the Church, and even chaired cabinet meetings that approved the land for the Church.
My question is, how can there be no suspicion of wrongdoing?
Was the following suspicious acts investigated?
1. The Source of the funds to build the Church
2. The $55,000 paid to the former occupants of the land, the Source of that money and who delivered it
3. The Cabinet involvement in granting the land to Pena
4. The Contract with Chinese contractor Michael Zhang (How did a private citizen able to hire a foreign contractor who was here on government to government contract?)
5. The Immigration Act of Trinidad and Tobago Chapter 18:01 ( the Sections pertaining to work permits)
6. The Prime Minister's Residence and Diplomatic Centre at La Fantasie Road, St Ann's ( If funds were siphoned from that project to build the church)
7. The $5M HOUSE at 22 Windsurf Road East, Westmoorings (Why did the state lease Chinese contractor Michael Zhang that property and did Pena stayed at that property)
………..DPP Gaspard Statement ………..
Neither Mr. Hart nor Ms. Pena has been interviewed on this score, owing to their unavailability. Further, the Judges Rules legally prohibit the police from treating them or the former Prime Minister as suspects, since the police appear not to have any evidence which would afford reasonable grounds for suspecting that they may have committed any offence arising out of this matter.
…it is clear that the evidence establishes that the then Prime Minister had an interest in the construction of the Church and that he had nourished his interest by visiting the proposed site and by making suggestions as to the proposed design of the Church. Further, he had chaired the Cabinet meetings which had approved the granting of State lands for the building of the Church. It should be noted that Cabinet has to approve the grant of all such lands.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
How can Mr. Manning chair cabinet meetings to approve something he had a vested interest and not recuse himself? Isn’t that conflict of interest and how can DPP Gaspard find nothing wrong with that?
Yet they are investigating the government on FRAUDULENT Documents?
I’m baffled!
Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 67 guests