Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
nismotrinidappa wrote:AdamB wrote:
Nismo,
You and your cohorts are saying that "scriptures cannot be uunderstood literally"...well how to understand it then?
COHORTS? I HAVE NO COHORTS
I was referring to Christians esp. those on this thread. [b][/b]
why use a negative term? have you been trained and taught to think like that?
clearly you did not get it the first time..here we go again
STUDY OF THE BIBLE!!... SOME THINGS JESUS SAID LITERALLY. SOME THINGS JESUS ANSWERED AND SAID INDIRECTLY THROUGH PARABLES.
IF A MAN SLAP YOU YOU GONNA SAY SLAP ME ON THE NEXT CHEEK? YOU SEE A CHRISTIAN DRAGGING TWO GOAT AND COW AND FOUR LAMB TO CHURCH? START TO THINK OUT OF YOUR WELL PLEASE. I AM NOT GOING TO ARGUE WITH YOU. NO SENSE ADAM COMING TO A GUNFIGHT WITH A KNIFE!!
No need for the drama, how do you understand the parables then?
its not drama.. its showing how narrowminded your brain and thinking is
If you study your bible carefully, you will see that the things that are said clearly agree with me and those that are unclear/parables christians misinterpret and CHOOSE it to mean whatever they want it to...THEIR DESIRES!! Which is the case of the current discussion about GOD.[/color]
Please understand this, if you want to say that you KNOW GOD,
WHO SAID THEY KNOW GOD? HUMAN MIND CANNOT COMPREHEND GOD IN ALL HIS MAJESTY HENCE IN THE OLD TESTAMENT THERE WAS A CLOUD AROUND HIS PRESENCE ETC.
So you agree with me then!!
what in the bible you agree with and what you dont agree with?
then that knowledge HAS to come from HIM, not from some Dr Price, DR Cash or the like, our very own Dr Dspike or the whole of Christianity, if they agree with him, has no foundation for his ideas. The problem is that our limited minds want to define GOD when it doesn't have the ability to fully conceive the reality of GOD. THERE IS NONE LIKE UNTO HIM (Quran Ch 112).
You say GOD is a spirit, what kind? Isn't Satan a spirit too? So is Satan and all spirits everywhere like you have defined GOD to be? GOD's has perfect attributes of seeing, hearing, knowing according to HIS majesty. Doesn't that necessate that HE DOES NOT have to be everywhere to see, hear and know? Then why have those attributes in the first place? GOD IS OMNIPRESENT... SATAN IS NOT..
Proof please!HE FLIES AND TRAFFICKS THE EARTH TO AND FRO AND UP AND DOWN AKA TELEPORTATION ASTRAL PROJECTION ALL THESE THINGS ARE SATANIC OCCULT POWERS.So airplanes and helicopters are satanic? Proof for teleportation?
Anyways, I really don't believe that your scriptures have been preserved, it has been changed to include those wrong concepts but within it there is some semblance of the TRUTH, that's why I refer to it. Plus you won't accept my preserved scripture which has superceded your's. I can only show you points that confirm my view to question the concepts being dished out by the philosophers.
WHAT ABOUT THE IDEA THAT YOUR SCRIPTURE IS BASED AND DERIVED FROM MY UNPRESERVED SCRIPTURE.... ANSWER MR ADAMB AND HOW YOU KNOW THAT YOURS HAS SUPERCEDED MINE? SIGH..
AdamB wrote:Kasey wrote:AdamB wrote:Anyways, I really don't believe that your scriptures have been preserved, it has been changed to include those wrong concepts but within it there is some semblance of the TRUTH, that's why I refer to it. Plus you won't accept my preserved scripture which has superceded your's. I can only show you points that confirm my view to question the concepts being dished out by the philosophers.
Do you know that the Hindu scriptures (not sure if all) HAVE BEEN PRESERVED? Their original Sanscrit versions (Ramayan and Gita I know for sure) are available to those who can understand them.
Sorry not very versed in hindu scriptures
you should stop there and take mega advice a couple pages ago
but you said GOD is formless yet do the opposite in these stories / scriptures. Gods, sons, daughters, avatars, etc. You decifer for yourself and then tell me what you think about the nature of GOD and the concepts of GOD being everything and everything being GOD, and reincarnation, heaven and hell, etc.
Are you being partisan (displaying biased allegiance) by accepting without questioning? Or questioning, seeing that things don't add up but still accept? Possibly there is no important aspect of your life on this earth that you would put your neck under a guillotine for but consider that you are doing that by virtue of your choice in this matter and putting your ETERNAL LIFE IN PARADISE on the line.
Whatever was written, how do we know that the one writing could be trusted with memory and piety, so that he would not have exaggerated like has happened with others? Or some may be "pious" (like the catholic church) but they change with GOOD INTENTIONS! That does not make it right or better, it just makes it CORRUPTED!!
Or that it actually came for GOD? How do we know that it wasn't just made up to teach goodness? Nothing is wrong with the goodness but the method.
And in all of that, are you being deceived? In that you have the wrong concept and belief about GOD and your good works will avail you no benefit in the next life. That Satan is a clever fellow, we should not underestimate him.
Kasey,
Look, I don't judge anyone,
stupes
I just have a message to deliver. It's up to each individual to put things in place to guarantee his personal success in the next life.
mamoo_pagal wrote:AdamB wrote:Kasey wrote:AdamB wrote:Anyways, I really don't believe that your scriptures have been preserved, it has been changed to include those wrong concepts but within it there is some semblance of the TRUTH, that's why I refer to it. Plus you won't accept my preserved scripture which has superceded your's. I can only show you points that confirm my view to question the concepts being dished out by the philosophers.
Do you know that the Hindu scriptures (not sure if all) HAVE BEEN PRESERVED? Their original Sanscrit versions (Ramayan and Gita I know for sure) are available to those who can understand them.
Sorry not very versed in hindu scriptures
you should stop there and take mega advice a couple pages ago
but you said GOD is formless yet do the opposite in these stories / scriptures. Gods, sons, daughters, avatars, etc. You decifer for yourself and then tell me what you think about the nature of GOD and the concepts of GOD being everything and everything being GOD, and reincarnation, heaven and hell, etc.
Are you being partisan (displaying biased allegiance) by accepting without questioning? Or questioning, seeing that things don't add up but still accept? Possibly there is no important aspect of your life on this earth that you would put your neck under a guillotine for but consider that you are doing that by virtue of your choice in this matter and putting your ETERNAL LIFE IN PARADISE on the line.
Whatever was written, how do we know that the one writing could be trusted with memory and piety, so that he would not have exaggerated like has happened with others? Or some may be "pious" (like the catholic church) but they change with GOOD INTENTIONS! That does not make it right or better, it just makes it CORRUPTED!!
Or that it actually came for GOD? How do we know that it wasn't just made up to teach goodness? Nothing is wrong with the goodness but the method.
And in all of that, are you being deceived? In that you have the wrong concept and belief about GOD and your good works will avail you no benefit in the next life. That Satan is a clever fellow, we should not underestimate him.
Kasey,
Look, I don't judge anyone,
stupes
I just have a message to deliver. It's up to each individual to put things in place to guarantee his personal success in the next life.
but they CAN all be incorrect / false!AdamB wrote:I have the intellect to know that directly opposing views cannot all be correct / true.
Duane 3NE 2NR wrote:but they CAN all be incorrect / false!AdamB wrote:I have the intellect to know that directly opposing views cannot all be correct / true.
<ferb>no, no we don't!</ferb>AdamB wrote:Duane 3NE 2NR wrote:but they CAN all be incorrect / false!AdamB wrote:I have the intellect to know that directly opposing views cannot all be correct / true.
We think alike....until they prove me wrong!!
you are condemning philosophical ideas in a discussion about religion? Really?AdamB wrote:BTW Dspike has provide NO PROOF, only philosophical ideas.
but that is bigotry!AdamB wrote:The hindus have been flushed out, most of them cowards, all along only criticizing without any basis. Kasey has reinforced my point that the common hindu neither knows of his scriptures nor have read them. The hindus here are no different. I respect kasey for his position with respect to his religion and the opposite for it's opposite.
AdamB wrote:mamoo_pagal wrote:AdamB wrote:Kasey wrote:AdamB wrote:Anyways, I really don't believe that your scriptures have been preserved, it has been changed to include those wrong concepts but within it there is some semblance of the TRUTH, that's why I refer to it. Plus you won't accept my preserved scripture which has superceded your's. I can only show you points that confirm my view to question the concepts being dished out by the philosophers.
Do you know that the Hindu scriptures (not sure if all) HAVE BEEN PRESERVED? Their original Sanscrit versions (Ramayan and Gita I know for sure) are available to those who can understand them.
Sorry not very versed in hindu scriptures
you should stop there and take mega advice a couple pages ago
but you said GOD is formless yet do the opposite in these stories / scriptures. Gods, sons, daughters, avatars, etc. You decifer for yourself and then tell me what you think about the nature of GOD and the concepts of GOD being everything and everything being GOD, and reincarnation, heaven and hell, etc.
Are you being partisan (displaying biased allegiance) by accepting without questioning? Or questioning, seeing that things don't add up but still accept? Possibly there is no important aspect of your life on this earth that you would put your neck under a guillotine for but consider that you are doing that by virtue of your choice in this matter and putting your ETERNAL LIFE IN PARADISE on the line.
Whatever was written, how do we know that the one writing could be trusted with memory and piety, so that he would not have exaggerated like has happened with others? Or some may be "pious" (like the catholic church) but they change with GOOD INTENTIONS! That does not make it right or better, it just makes it CORRUPTED!!
Or that it actually came for GOD? How do we know that it wasn't just made up to teach goodness? Nothing is wrong with the goodness but the method.
And in all of that, are you being deceived? In that you have the wrong concept and belief about GOD and your good works will avail you no benefit in the next life. That Satan is a clever fellow, we should not underestimate him.
Kasey,
Look, I don't judge anyone,
stupes
I just have a message to deliver. It's up to each individual to put things in place to guarantee his personal success in the next life.
Mamoo,
Well enlighten me then...
d spike wrote:AdamB wrote:[You say Jesus is GOD and he dwelled on the Earth, then apply the above verse to this claim...
Since when have you started applying scripture in such a random manner?
If all scripture must be applied to all situations.. then:
How many adulterers have you stoned?
Killed any infidels lately?
Yuh losing it Dspike, these are punishment / laws from GOD executable BY THE (ISLAMIC) STATE with conditions like trial / witnesses...
This is the error of Literalism. One does not apply scripture to every "application required"... you use this whenever you want to change the scriptures!that's like a child trying to ram a jigsaw-puzzle piece into every empty space, pounding it to make it fit...Like trying to RAM TRINITY DOWN PPL THROAT!! TRYING TO FIT 3 GODS IN 1!!
The concept of GOD in Islam fits perfectly with knowledge, wisdom and justice because it comes from GOD and incidentally these are also HIS attributes. HE is near to us in HIS LOFTINESS and lofty in HIS closeness to us! HE does not have to be here on the earth to control all affairs.
[/color]
Ermmmm... is that how you go through life?
Ahimsa means kindness and non-violence towards all living things including animals; it respects living beings as a unity, the belief that all living things are connected. Avoidance of verbal and physical violence is also a part of this principle, although ahimsa recognizes self-defense when necessary, as a sign of a strong spirit. It is closely connected with the notion that all kinds of violence entail negative karmic consequences.
Dizzy28 wrote:The Hindus here would not come out (Flushed out in your words) maybe because they are observing the basic principle of Ahimsa.
From Wikipedia:Ahimsa means kindness and non-violence towards all living things including animals; it respects living beings as a unity, the belief that all living things are connected. Avoidance of verbal and physical violence is also a part of this principle, although ahimsa recognizes self-defense when necessary, as a sign of a strong spirit. It is closely connected with the notion that all kinds of violence entail negative karmic consequences.
Dizzy28 wrote:^ Self Defense when necessary. Putting up with constant attacks would trip someone at some time. Not everyone as patient or as non confrontational as Gandhi.
DFC wrote:dspike, what are your thoughts on Re-incarnation?
Do you believe in it?
*tryna have an actual discussion here*
AdamB wrote:That street is 2-way, wouldn't you say?
Kasey wrote:I honestly dont know where to start. I dont even know if I want to get into it. Due to my unpredictable job constraints, my time on tuner varies quite alot. Sometimes I am on tuner 4 times a day, and sometimes I am on tuner one time in two weeks! Looking at the post count of this thread everyday, I rerally dont think I can keep up if I lapse. Of course what does matter right? But I would not want to be seen like AdamB who does not answer some posts (maybe for similar reasons of involuntary constraints?). I would really like to delve into it without distractions of work, home and kids. But what would one expect from an online forum right?
Kasey wrote:Anyway my view of religion is this (and I made this up myself eh...):
"I do not wholly believe in the scriptures of my religion, but I believe in the lessons they teach". How does one get the lessons? Honestly, I dont know, but I just think of the other guy, his well being, and the surroundings, and try to do what's best.
Kasey wrote:In the west, the hindu religion is very misunderstood, due to the language barrier. In my understanding, what we see in Trinidad here is actually not really what India practices. The indenturers came here from different parts of india, with different sects of religious beliefs and they obviously got mixed up and now makes for a different religion. The pundits (but not all), though knowledgable in the scriptures, are sometimes not capable of extracting the real lessons from the books, and hence leads to misunderstanding, and confusion.
But again, I think that the main problem with misunderstanding, with hinduism in the West in the Language thing. Most of the hindus in Trinidad do not understand Hindi or Sanscrit. But why do they hold on to it? Because some of them actually try to find out (and evaluate for themselves) the real lessons from translations, and realise that there is alot of philosohpy contained within the scriptures. Things that makes one think about life in different ways. The idea on ONE god, the idea of detachment, the necescity to look after your fellow man, the idea that prayer is NOT the only meduim, etc.
AdamB wrote:I have the intellect to know that directly opposing views cannot all be correct / true.
AdamB wrote:BTW Dspike has provide NO PROOF, only philosophical ideas.
AdamB wrote: Kasey has reinforced my point that the common hindu neither knows of his scriptures nor have read them. The hindus here are no different.
AdamB wrote:I go through life just fine without your philosophical innovated ideas.
AdamB wrote:Have some patience, dspike.
How many have you converted?
AdamB wrote:Anyways, I really don't believe that your scriptures have been preserved, it has been changed to include those wrong concepts
DFC wrote:dspike, what are your thoughts on Re-incarnation?
Do you believe in it?
I disagreed spike wrote:This much is obvious.AdamB wrote:I go through life just fine without your philosophical innovated ideas.
Duane 3NE 2NR wrote:I disagreed spike wrote:This much is obvious.AdamB wrote:I go through life just fine without your philosophical innovated ideas.
Depends on what your accepted definition of "just fine" is. Oblivious and content can hardly be considered "just fine".
Ignorance is not bliss IMO
AdamB wrote: Or some may be "pious" (like the catholic church) but they change with GOOD INTENTIONS!
megadoc1 wrote: I was reading some of your post in another ched years ago and you said that religion is a subset of society or culture cant remember exactly how it go...
AdamB wrote:Duane,
Muslims are not oblivious of philosophical ideas and innovated practises in religion. We are well aware of these, many muslims groups have deviated and delved deep into these, just google SUFISM.
Christians, as evident from Dspike's rantings, have also done this. The difference is that the knowledge has been lost or corruptedmake up your mind, which one is it lost or corrupted? Based on which one you choose can you identify what information was lost or which section was corrupted? Remember you need to have the original information to compare and contrast and the one's on the right path were executed centuries ago. Now they seem to have their flock in awe of their putrid ideas. The core of their belief system is based on philosophic ideas. How come the Jews don't have this also? Because they held fast to their scriptures (Torah), although they changed some laws to suit their desires. However they maintained the correct concept of GOD, well most of them.
I NEVER said Muslims are oblivious of philosophical ideas or of anything.AdamB wrote:Duane,
Muslims are not oblivious of philosophical ideas and innovated practises in religion. We are well aware of these, many muslims groups have deviated and delved deep into these, just google SUFISM.
Christians, as evident from Dspike's rantings, have also done this. The difference is that the knowledge has been lost or corrupted and the one's on the right path were executed centuries ago. Now they seem to have their flock in awe of their putrid ideas. The core of their belief system is based on philosophic ideas. How come the Jews don't have this also? Because they held fast to their scriptures (Torah), although they changed some laws to suit their desires. However they maintained the correct concept of GOD, well most of them.
Duane 3NE 2NR wrote:I NEVER said Muslims are oblivious of philosophical ideas or of anything.AdamB wrote:Duane,
Muslims are not oblivious of philosophical ideas and innovated practises in religion. We are well aware of these, many muslims groups have deviated and delved deep into these, just google SUFISM.
Christians, as evident from Dspike's rantings, have also done this. The difference is that the knowledge has been lost or corrupted and the one's on the right path were executed centuries ago. Now they seem to have their flock in awe of their putrid ideas. The core of their belief system is based on philosophic ideas. How come the Jews don't have this also? Because they held fast to their scriptures (Torah), although they changed some laws to suit their desires. However they maintained the correct concept of GOD, well most of them.
I said that YOU are oblivious and bigoted. You continue to bad talk other religious beliefs even though you admit that you have never read their texts or understand their teachings.
nismotrinidappa wrote:when the truth comes to adamb ,will he be able to recognize it?
Kasey wrote:Why do you constantly put human limitations and blatantly say you undersatand God or the concept of it?
Do you not know that human limitations, compared to God is also infinite?
Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 129 guests