Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
Eg.. see the medical background of the doctors on the site.ed360123 wrote:So they refuse to do the trials, are we just supposed to take them at their word? Also 'well respected' by who?aaron17 wrote:Tell that to the flccc doctors who actually treat patients and who are well respected. And u will all label them is misinformation and soo on.ed360123 wrote:I'll restate what I said. There is no proven 'treatment' the, Ivermectin that these people are parroting has no scientific evidence backing it up. They're also against randomized trials to test it.aaron17 wrote:ed360123 wrote:Because the 'treatment' you speak of doesn't exist.hover11 wrote:Why release a treatment when you can market half baked vaccines as your only salvationaaron17 wrote:Release the treatment!
Emergency authorization use of vaccine can only be used when there is no treatment. If there is a treatment...they wouldnt have use the vaccines. They hiding these treatment.
https://covid19criticalcare.com/
You still haven't answered the question, are we just supposed trust these ~4 doctors at their word (who are for some reason, against doing the proper studies) over the general current medical consensus that Ivermectin does not treat COVID?aaron17 wrote:Eg.. see the medical background of the doctors on the site.ed360123 wrote:So they refuse to do the trials, are we just supposed to take them at their word? Also 'well respected' by who?aaron17 wrote:Tell that to the flccc doctors who actually treat patients and who are well respected. And u will all label them is misinformation and soo on.ed360123 wrote:I'll restate what I said. There is no proven 'treatment' the, Ivermectin that these people are parroting has no scientific evidence backing it up. They're also against randomized trials to test it.aaron17 wrote:ed360123 wrote:Because the 'treatment' you speak of doesn't exist.hover11 wrote:Why release a treatment when you can market half baked vaccines as your only salvationaaron17 wrote:Release the treatment!
Emergency authorization use of vaccine can only be used when there is no treatment. If there is a treatment...they wouldnt have use the vaccines. They hiding these treatment.
https://covid19criticalcare.com/
What kind of studies u are looking for ? Clinical randomized trial ones which WHO oversee?ed360123 wrote:You still haven't answered the question, are we just supposed trust these ~4 doctors at their word (who are for some reason, against doing the proper studies) over the general current medical consensus that Ivermectin does not treat COVID?aaron17 wrote:Eg.. see the medical background of the doctors on the site.ed360123 wrote:So they refuse to do the trials, are we just supposed to take them at their word? Also 'well respected' by who?aaron17 wrote:Tell that to the flccc doctors who actually treat patients and who are well respected. And u will all label them is misinformation and soo on.ed360123 wrote:I'll restate what I said. There is no proven 'treatment' the, Ivermectin that these people are parroting has no scientific evidence backing it up. They're also against randomized trials to test it.aaron17 wrote:ed360123 wrote:Because the 'treatment' you speak of doesn't exist.hover11 wrote:Why release a treatment when you can market half baked vaccines as your only salvation
https://covid19criticalcare.com/
So you don't trust studies either now?aaron17 wrote:What kind of studies u are looking for ? Clinical randomized trial ones which WHO oversee?ed360123 wrote:You still haven't answered the question, are we just supposed trust these ~4 doctors at their word (who are for some reason, against doing the proper studies) over the general current medical consensus that Ivermectin does not treat COVID?aaron17 wrote:Eg.. see the medical background of the doctors on the site.ed360123 wrote:So they refuse to do the trials, are we just supposed to take them at their word? Also 'well respected' by who?aaron17 wrote:Tell that to the flccc doctors who actually treat patients and who are well respected. And u will all label them is misinformation and soo on.ed360123 wrote:I'll restate what I said. There is no proven 'treatment' the, Ivermectin that these people are parroting has no scientific evidence backing it up. They're also against randomized trials to test it.aaron17 wrote:ed360123 wrote:Because the 'treatment' you speak of doesn't exist.
https://covid19criticalcare.com/
Idk what u mean . What trials u looking for?ed360123 wrote:So you don't trust studies either now?aaron17 wrote:What kind of studies u are looking for ? Clinical randomized trial ones which WHO oversee?ed360123 wrote:You still haven't answered the question, are we just supposed trust these ~4 doctors at their word (who are for some reason, against doing the proper studies) over the general current medical consensus that Ivermectin does not treat COVID?aaron17 wrote:Eg.. see the medical background of the doctors on the site.ed360123 wrote:So they refuse to do the trials, are we just supposed to take them at their word? Also 'well respected' by who?aaron17 wrote:Tell that to the flccc doctors who actually treat patients and who are well respected. And u will all label them is misinformation and soo on.ed360123 wrote:I'll restate what I said. There is no proven 'treatment' the, Ivermectin that these people are parroting has no scientific evidence backing it up. They're also against randomized trials to test it.aaron17 wrote:
https://covid19criticalcare.com/
I'm looking for proper peer-reviewed studies that it's effective.aaron17 wrote:Idk what u mean . What trials u looking for?ed360123 wrote:So you don't trust studies either now?aaron17 wrote:What kind of studies u are looking for ? Clinical randomized trial ones which WHO oversee?ed360123 wrote:You still haven't answered the question, are we just supposed trust these ~4 doctors at their word (who are for some reason, against doing the proper studies) over the general current medical consensus that Ivermectin does not treat COVID?aaron17 wrote:Eg.. see the medical background of the doctors on the site.ed360123 wrote:So they refuse to do the trials, are we just supposed to take them at their word? Also 'well respected' by who?aaron17 wrote:Tell that to the flccc doctors who actually treat patients and who are well respected. And u will all label them is misinformation and soo on.ed360123 wrote:I'll restate what I said. There is no proven 'treatment' the, Ivermectin that these people are parroting has no scientific evidence backing it up. They're also against randomized trials to test it.
I think you mean antiparasitic and not antisemitic lol.88sins wrote:This ivermectin nonsense again? Allyuh eh tired?
It's relatively easy to prove if a drug works, whether for its original purpose or as an off label treatment.
But after 6 months of all kinda old talk and anecdotal stories, there is no definitive data indicating that this particular antisemitic has any effect whatsoever on this virus. No solid evidence that is reduces or eliminates the symptoms, the severity, risk of contracting the disease, or the risk of mortality.
If you need more than 6 months and a million people to prove a product does what you claim it does, odds are that you can't, and it doesn't.
The flccc site should have it. Can u navigate to it or?ed360123 wrote:I'm looking for proper peer-reviewed studies that it's effective.aaron17 wrote:Idk what u mean . What trials u looking for?ed360123 wrote:So you don't trust studies either now?aaron17 wrote:What kind of studies u are looking for ? Clinical randomized trial ones which WHO oversee?ed360123 wrote:You still haven't answered the question, are we just supposed trust these ~4 doctors at their word (who are for some reason, against doing the proper studies) over the general current medical consensus that Ivermectin does not treat COVID?aaron17 wrote:Eg.. see the medical background of the doctors on the site.ed360123 wrote:So they refuse to do the trials, are we just supposed to take them at their word? Also 'well respected' by who?aaron17 wrote:Tell that to the flccc doctors who actually treat patients and who are well respected. And u will all label them is misinformation and soo on.
I'm not seeing it. Can you link it to me?aaron17 wrote:The flccc site should have it. Can u navigate to it or?ed360123 wrote:I'm looking for proper peer-reviewed studies that it's effective.aaron17 wrote:Idk what u mean . What trials u looking for?ed360123 wrote:So you don't trust studies either now?aaron17 wrote:What kind of studies u are looking for ? Clinical randomized trial ones which WHO oversee?ed360123 wrote:You still haven't answered the question, are we just supposed trust these ~4 doctors at their word (who are for some reason, against doing the proper studies) over the general current medical consensus that Ivermectin does not treat COVID?aaron17 wrote:Eg.. see the medical background of the doctors on the site.ed360123 wrote:So they refuse to do the trials, are we just supposed to take them at their word? Also 'well respected' by who?
https://covid19criticalcare.com/ivermectin-in-covid-19/ed360123 wrote:I'm not seeing it. Can you link it to me?aaron17 wrote:The flccc site should have it. Can u navigate to it or?ed360123 wrote:I'm looking for proper peer-reviewed studies that it's effective.aaron17 wrote:Idk what u mean . What trials u looking for?ed360123 wrote:So you don't trust studies either now?aaron17 wrote:What kind of studies u are looking for ? Clinical randomized trial ones which WHO oversee?ed360123 wrote:You still haven't answered the question, are we just supposed trust these ~4 doctors at their word (who are for some reason, against doing the proper studies) over the general current medical consensus that Ivermectin does not treat COVID?aaron17 wrote:Eg.. see the medical background of the doctors on the site.
So your evidence is the FLCCC's own website. Again, how am I just supposed to take their own word for it.aaron17 wrote:https://covid19criticalcare.com/ivermectin-in-covid-19/ed360123 wrote:I'm not seeing it. Can you link it to me?aaron17 wrote:The flccc site should have it. Can u navigate to it or?ed360123 wrote:I'm looking for proper peer-reviewed studies that it's effective.aaron17 wrote:Idk what u mean . What trials u looking for?ed360123 wrote:So you don't trust studies either now?aaron17 wrote:What kind of studies u are looking for ? Clinical randomized trial ones which WHO oversee?ed360123 wrote:You still haven't answered the question, are we just supposed trust these ~4 doctors at their word (who are for some reason, against doing the proper studies) over the general current medical consensus that Ivermectin does not treat COVID?
These are the medical evidence. ..link.
The picture i am seeing it on google search as a pdf. .. idk where to find that on the site exactly.
Looks like old news ....i read that long time ago. I heard they are saying now key treatment of using iver is using it early.ed360123 wrote:So your evidence is the FLCCC's own website. Again, how am I just supposed to take their own word for it.aaron17 wrote:https://covid19criticalcare.com/ivermectin-in-covid-19/ed360123 wrote:I'm not seeing it. Can you link it to me?aaron17 wrote:The flccc site should have it. Can u navigate to it or?ed360123 wrote:I'm looking for proper peer-reviewed studies that it's effective.aaron17 wrote:Idk what u mean . What trials u looking for?ed360123 wrote:So you don't trust studies either now?aaron17 wrote:What kind of studies u are looking for ? Clinical randomized trial ones which WHO oversee?
These are the medical evidence. ..link.
The picture i am seeing it on google search as a pdf. .. idk where to find that on the site exactly.
I'd suggest you take a thorough read of this article.
https://amp.abc.net.au/article/100440624
Heard thatredmanjp wrote:Treatment that is proven is monoclonal antibodies. FDA issued a EUA.
ed360123 wrote:So your evidence is the FLCCC's own website. Again, how am I just supposed to take their own word for it.aaron17 wrote:https://covid19criticalcare.com/ivermectin-in-covid-19/ed360123 wrote:I'm not seeing it. Can you link it to me?aaron17 wrote:The flccc site should have it. Can u navigate to it or?ed360123 wrote:I'm looking for proper peer-reviewed studies that it's effective.aaron17 wrote:Idk what u mean . What trials u looking for?ed360123 wrote:So you don't trust studies either now?aaron17 wrote:What kind of studies u are looking for ? Clinical randomized trial ones which WHO oversee?
These are the medical evidence. ..link.
The picture i am seeing it on google search as a pdf. .. idk where to find that on the site exactly.Screenshot_20210912-155153_Drive.jpg
I'd suggest you take a thorough read of this article.
https://amp.abc.net.au/article/100440624
OK then, if you don't trust the article, you can go to the source. Also the article isn't saying that. That's just a quote from the FDA, which exists because persons in the states were taking livestock grade Ivermectin.drchaos wrote:ed360123 wrote:So your evidence is the FLCCC's own website. Again, how am I just supposed to take their own word for it.aaron17 wrote:https://covid19criticalcare.com/ivermectin-in-covid-19/ed360123 wrote:I'm not seeing it. Can you link it to me?aaron17 wrote:The flccc site should have it. Can u navigate to it or?ed360123 wrote:I'm looking for proper peer-reviewed studies that it's effective.aaron17 wrote:Idk what u mean . What trials u looking for?ed360123 wrote:So you don't trust studies either now?
These are the medical evidence. ..link.
The picture i am seeing it on google search as a pdf. .. idk where to find that on the site exactly.Screenshot_20210912-155153_Drive.jpg
I'd suggest you take a thorough read of this article.
https://amp.abc.net.au/article/100440624
This article is dripping with Bias and should be ignored ...
When you say sheit like "you are not a horse or cow" its basically means you are a dumbass and anti-science.
Amoxicillin and prednisolone are used to treat dogs regularly by VETs.
So we stop using these meds in humans because "you are not a dog"?
redmanjp wrote:Oxford is doing trials on ivm also.
https://www.ox.ac.uk/news/2021-06-23-ivermectin-be-investigated-possible-treatment-covid-19-oxford-s-principle-trial
So while we can't say its proven effective we also should not dismiss it yet as just crazy conspiracy theory. Look what happened with that lab leak theory.
U mean the us fda tweet?ed360123 wrote:OK then, if you don't trust the article, you can go to the source. Also the article isn't saying that. That's just a quote from the FDA, which exists because persons in the states were taking livestock grade Ivermectin.drchaos wrote:ed360123 wrote:So your evidence is the FLCCC's own website. Again, how am I just supposed to take their own word for it.aaron17 wrote:https://covid19criticalcare.com/ivermectin-in-covid-19/ed360123 wrote:I'm not seeing it. Can you link it to me?aaron17 wrote:The flccc site should have it. Can u navigate to it or?ed360123 wrote:I'm looking for proper peer-reviewed studies that it's effective.aaron17 wrote:Idk what u mean . What trials u looking for?
These are the medical evidence. ..link.
The picture i am seeing it on google search as a pdf. .. idk where to find that on the site exactly.Screenshot_20210912-155153_Drive.jpg
I'd suggest you take a thorough read of this article.
https://amp.abc.net.au/article/100440624
This article is dripping with Bias and should be ignored ...
When you say sheit like "you are not a horse or cow" its basically means you are a dumbass and anti-science.
Amoxicillin and prednisolone are used to treat dogs regularly by VETs.
So we stop using these meds in humans because "you are not a dog"?
Yes.aaron17 wrote:U mean the us fda tweet?ed360123 wrote:OK then, if you don't trust the article, you can go to the source. Also the article isn't saying that. That's just a quote from the FDA, which exists because persons in the states were taking livestock grade Ivermectin.drchaos wrote:ed360123 wrote:So your evidence is the FLCCC's own website. Again, how am I just supposed to take their own word for it.aaron17 wrote:https://covid19criticalcare.com/ivermectin-in-covid-19/ed360123 wrote:I'm not seeing it. Can you link it to me?aaron17 wrote:The flccc site should have it. Can u navigate to it or?ed360123 wrote:I'm looking for proper peer-reviewed studies that it's effective.
These are the medical evidence. ..link.
The picture i am seeing it on google search as a pdf. .. idk where to find that on the site exactly.Screenshot_20210912-155153_Drive.jpg
I'd suggest you take a thorough read of this article.
https://amp.abc.net.au/article/100440624
This article is dripping with Bias and should be ignored ...
When you say sheit like "you are not a horse or cow" its basically means you are a dumbass and anti-science.
Amoxicillin and prednisolone are used to treat dogs regularly by VETs.
So we stop using these meds in humans because "you are not a dog"?
ruffneck_12 wrote:You don't even need Ivermectin since the virus has a 97% survival rate in even an unhealthy population like trinidad.
(It's 98-99% usually.)
but hold this
drchaos wrote:ruffneck_12 wrote:You don't even need Ivermectin since the virus has a 97% survival rate in even an unhealthy population like trinidad.
(It's 98-99% usually.)
but hold this
With 3% mortality rate we still need it for the people are very ill.
High dose IV vitamin C, like 12.5g to 25 grams works really well. Doesn't stop covid but can have positive effects with preventing ARDS and Cytokine storms.
Also make sure your Vit D3 levels are optimized ... its a cheap blood test ... Everyone should do this.
Serum Zinc is also great place to pay attention to even if you are vaccinated or not.
Lastly people need to stop eating sheit ... Eating sheit f#%ks up your immune system.
Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”
Users browsing this forum: alfa, Bing [Bot] and 59 guests