Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
kaylex wrote:The real question is..
If it has reached the DPP office.. is why ?
If there was nothing criminal found in the alleged response of GOOGLE INC. the TTPS would have issued a statement and indicate there was no wrong doing.. not so?
If however they discovered something of illrepute and possibly warrants charges they would foward casefile to DPP for advice? not so?
What will then take the DPP a while to lay charges ? Investigation continuing? or decision on what charges to profer?
I just saying?? SHEIT aint all that is being bantered in public..
2+2 =4
Redman wrote:kaylex wrote:The real question is..
If it has reached the DPP office.. is why ?
If there was nothing criminal found in the alleged response of GOOGLE INC. the TTPS would have issued a statement and indicate there was no wrong doing.. not so?
If however they discovered something of illrepute and possibly warrants charges they would foward casefile to DPP for advice? not so?
What will then take the DPP a while to lay charges ? Investigation continuing? or decision on what charges to profer?
I just saying?? SHEIT aint all that is being bantered in public..
2+2 =4
Well I disagree
TTPS will make a statement when they finished...
The real question is whether there is/was a conspiracy.
Thats the material question that needs to be determined..
The noise over the email and DDPP just postpone us arriving at the foundation issue=whether or not there was a conspiracy.
Its like the Ish/Steve case.....the delays over PROCESS avoid the substance...proven template
Let me ask a question: If it is determined beyond any doubt that Anand and KPB and Suruj wwere in fact conspiring to kill xyz-would the ddpp release matter??
kaylex wrote:maybe not.. enlighten me all knowing rolling stock.. lol
rollingstock wrote:kaylex wrote:maybe not.. enlighten me all knowing rolling stock.. lol
In all high profile or difficult investigations the DPP office is consulted and will guide the police to assist the investigator to garnish the most compelling evidence or clear up ambiguities.
At the conclusion of the investigation will determine if to prefer charges based on the evidence gathered.
(read clearly eh tun monitoring me, I made no specific indication to this investigation)
UML wrote:At what cost?
UML wrote:
UML wrote:UML wrote:
Paging the outspoken Martin Daly, Reginald Dumas, Dr Winford James, Fixin T&T, Father Harvey, Archbishop Harris, Jack Warner, Ramesh Lawrence, Basdeo Panday, etc.
brams112 wrote:UML wrote:UML wrote:
Paging the outspoken Martin Daly, Reginald Dumas, Dr Winford James, Fixin T&T, Father Harvey, Archbishop Harris, Jack Warner, Ramesh Lawrence, Basdeo Panday, etc.
Why about the crew in here![]()
.
UML wrote:
POLITICAL CONSEQUENCES ON EMAILGATE
Last Updated on 19.05.2015
Political Analyst Dr. Hamid Ghany says Opposition Leader Dr. Keith Rowley will face severe political consequences if the Prime Minister is right on the emailgate issue.
At the UNC Monday Night Forum at the Brazil Secondary School, Prime Minister Kamla Persad-Bissessar called on the Acting Commissioner of Police and the Director of Public Prosecutions to state the position of the investigation into emailgate which arose in May 2013, when Dr. Rowley said he received 31 emails incriminating Government officials for allegedly plotting against the Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP) Roger Gaspard, a journalist and fired Minister, Mr. Herbert Volney.
Speaking on CTV's Good Morning Trinidad and Tobago on Tuesday, Dr. Ghany said there will be consequences on both sides.
"The Chief Secretary of the Tobago House of Assembly Orville London is on record as saying that he will have a heavy price to pay if it is that they turned out to be fake. If it turns out to be true, then the Prime Minister and the Cabinet will come under severe indictment and in an election year there could be very adverse consequences for them."
Dr. Ghany said the issues of ethics in public office and performance will be key to voters in the upcoming election campaign.
"I think that the issue of performance in office is one that the Government obviously would have to highlight as they move forward in trying to make a case to the public. Undecided votes most probably will be curious about ethics in public office to see what the outcomes are of some of these allegations and they will be curious about performance in office and I think that is going to be a critical issue the PNM and those opposed to the Government have the task of trying to convince the population that the Government has not done enough and the Government is ethically challenged and therefore they need to be replaced." http://ctntworld.com/cnews2/index.php?o ... Itemid=707
greggle71 wrote:Faris on the news attempting to spin. The backlash has begun, the PNM will have a job on its hand to manage the public discourse on this.
brams112 wrote:rollingstock wrote:kaylex wrote:maybe not.. enlighten me all knowing rolling stock.. lol
In all high profile or difficult investigations the DPP office is consulted and will guide the police to assist the investigator to garnish the most compelling evidence or clear up ambiguities.
At the conclusion of the investigation will determine if to prefer charges based on the evidence gathered.
(read clearly eh tun monitoring me, I made no specific indication to this investigation)
Stock people like these guys feel is jus so people does get lock up most do not know the final word with prosecutions lie with the dpp.
Redman wrote:Ok I guess now is to determine the truth with regard to Rowley....deliberately lied or misled?
And we need this before election too
The_Honourable wrote:I eh guh lie... PNM quiet. I'm pretty sure they will ignore the IC and say they waiting on the DPP.
"Rowley said he wanted to take the opportunity to repeat the Opposition’s view that this investigation must be conducted by the constitutionally established independent Integrity Commission in a thorough manner, “but with all due alacrity”."
Source: http://www.trinidadexpress.com/news/Row ... 40691.html
janfar wrote:How can you investigate a conspiracy based on a false precursor? Explain the logic please cuz i am baffled?
Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”
Users browsing this forum: foss and 80 guests