Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
crazybalhead wrote:No the car hit them. In your example, did a cyclist hit your car?
timelapse wrote:crazybalhead wrote:No the car hit them. In your example, did a cyclist hit your car?
Hypothetically yes.
That's actually a really good idea. I'm sure that could be made to work once the details hashed out.timelapse wrote:^ Thats where I was headed with this.
Bicycle insurance if you want to use the highway, some sort of identification number/registration, inspection and everything thing else involved with a car. Just for the highway alone, other roads they could get a bligh
Insurance companies that like money I'm guessing. Besides a tiida with bald tires is much more dangerous and they are able to get insurance. They will obviously need to get their actuarial experts to come up with the insurance premium, payments and terms.pugboy wrote:Yeah but which insurance company going to give coverage for a bike with the knowledge that they may have to make a payout if cyclist hit a cayenne and cause accident?
pugboy wrote:Yeah but which insurance company going to give coverage for a bike with the knowledge that they may have to make a payout if cyclist hit a cayenne and cause accident?
MG Man wrote:Old car doing 20kph on he highway is a dangerous hazard
Bunch of cyclists with escort on highway huh a hazard?
pete wrote:MG Man wrote:Old car doing 20kph on he highway is a dangerous hazard
Bunch of cyclists with escort on highway huh a hazard?
Those cyclists doing more like 35-40kph tho.
pugboy wrote:Yeah but which insurance company going to give coverage for a bike with the knowledge that they may have to make a payout if cyclist hit a cayenne and cause accident?
maj. tom wrote:wait, a bicycle is classified as a vehicle now?
so... insurance? driving test? licence? vehicle inspection? safety standards?
what utter corrupt fvckery is this all of a sudden?
maj. tom wrote:I don't even understand why people in their right minds would be fighting for rights to ride a bicycle on the highway! Would they do this on the I-95? The ON-401? The UK-M5? The Bundesautobahn 10?
Why these idiots WANT to ride on a highway? They should want to be safe and stick to the main roads. I don't even get this!
Is Trinidad a real place?
SMc wrote:in Barbados a registration plate for bicycles is a norm..and possibly a requirement
maj. tom wrote:wait, a bicycle is classified as a vehicle now?
so... insurance? driving test? licence? vehicle inspection? safety standards?
what utter corrupt fvckery is this all of a sudden?
I don't even understand why people in their right minds would be fighting for rights to ride a bicycle on the highway! Would they do this on the I-95? The ON-401? The UK-M5? The Bundesautobahn 10?
Why these idiots WANT to ride on a highway? They should want to be safe and stick to the main roads. I don't even get this!
Is Trinidad a real place?
Rory Phoulorie wrote:According to Michael Phillips, former national cyclist, on a radio programme last week, according to the accident statistics for Trinidad, more fatalities to cyclists occur on the secondary and tertiary roads than on the highways. Michael Phillips himself got knocked down (in a hit and run) by a truck while riding down Chaguaramas. I have no issues with cyclists on the highway if they are properly escorted (outriders front and rear), and if they are riding during non-peak hours.
adnj wrote:Rory Phoulorie wrote:According to Michael Phillips, former national cyclist, on a radio programme last week, according to the accident statistics for Trinidad, more fatalities to cyclists occur on the secondary and tertiary roads than on the highways. Michael Phillips himself got knocked down (in a hit and run) by a truck while riding down Chaguaramas. I have no issues with cyclists on the highway if they are properly escorted (outriders front and rear), and if they are riding during non-peak hours.
I don't believe that there is causality between secondary road travel and bicycle fatalities. You will more likely find a correlation between fatalities and miles traveled along with traffic speed.
ek4ever wrote:SMc wrote:in Barbados a registration plate for bicycles is a norm..and possibly a requirement
In the good old colonial days, police would actually stop bicyclists to check license and make sure your light working.
https://youtu.be/JI49-i-QFl4
Rory Phoulorie wrote:
I just repeated what the man said on the radio programme.
Anyway, the average width of a traffic lane on a secondary road varies from 3.0m to 3.5m, even narrower on a tertiary road. The lane width on the highway is 3.65m. On a secondary road, there is very little to no shoulder. On the highway, the outer shoulder is around 2.0m. It is illegal for cyclists to ride on a sidewalk, therefore, on secondary and tertiary roads there is a smaller buffer distance between motor vehicles and cyclists. Furthermore, where you don't have traffic congestion, from my own observation a high percentage of motorists exceed the speed limit on secondary roads.
Considering the foregoing, I could believe the accident statistics without seeing them myself.
teems1 wrote:At the end of the day it comes down to the risk associated with cycling.
Just because it's legal to cycle on the CRH doesn't mean it's a good idea.
Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”
Users browsing this forum: Duane 3NE 2NR, pugboy and 188 guests