Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
VexXx Dogg wrote:I'm also getting the sense that the devaluation is coming. Maybe 8:1
This is gonna be another tight squeeze of a budget.
timelapse wrote:VexXx Dogg wrote:I'm also getting the sense that the devaluation is coming. Maybe 8:1
This is gonna be another tight squeeze of a budget.
Allyuh not seeming to understand the situation.They want to crash the economy on purpose.All the vacant properties will be ripe for the picking to the wealthy
VexXx Dogg wrote:timelapse wrote:VexXx Dogg wrote:I'm also getting the sense that the devaluation is coming. Maybe 8:1
This is gonna be another tight squeeze of a budget.
Allyuh not seeming to understand the situation.They want to crash the economy on purpose.All the vacant properties will be ripe for the picking to the wealthy
Yea, this sounding like rumshop talk with foil hats. it not making any sense.
In this connection we would call on the country to support the national effort as we seek to prioritize the use of our limited inflows of foreign exchange. We will not be going back to the exchange controls we had in place before 1993, but we will certainly not be using up our foreign reserves to keep the exchange rate at levels which will maximize our imports. When we took the decision in 1993 to let the market substantially determine the rate of exchange, we were accepting, in principle, that we would live with any rate the foreign exchange market determined. It is nevertheless true that when we were in a period of favourable foreign exchange inflows, if the market called for a big change in the exchange rate, we would use our reserves and put enough currency in the market to keep the rate at a level with which we were comfortable. However, in this period of significant decline in foreign exchange inflows it will be unreasonable and dangerous to use up our foreign reserves as we were accustomed to. This would be paving our way into the arms of the IMF and that is something this government is NOT prepared to do. What this means is that the only way in which the exchange rate will be held to its traditional level is if we cut back on our demand, bringing the demand more in line with the reduced inflows. This is where prioritizing comes in. Our basic position here will be that first priority for foreign exchange will be given to those firms or industries that generate reasonable amounts of foreign exchange. If the demand for foreign exchange is not curtailed we will eventually be forced to live with the rate determined by the market. This is where holding strain and varying our taste come in.........http://www.trinidadexpress.com/20170927 ... rgy-sector
Dizzy28 wrote:In this connection we would call on the country to support the national effort as we seek to prioritize the use of our limited inflows of foreign exchange. We will not be going back to the exchange controls we had in place before 1993, but we will certainly not be using up our foreign reserves to keep the exchange rate at levels which will maximize our imports. When we took the decision in 1993 to let the market substantially determine the rate of exchange, we were accepting, in principle, that we would live with any rate the foreign exchange market determined. It is nevertheless true that when we were in a period of favourable foreign exchange inflows, if the market called for a big change in the exchange rate, we would use our reserves and put enough currency in the market to keep the rate at a level with which we were comfortable. However, in this period of significant decline in foreign exchange inflows it will be unreasonable and dangerous to use up our foreign reserves as we were accustomed to. This would be paving our way into the arms of the IMF and that is something this government is NOT prepared to do. What this means is that the only way in which the exchange rate will be held to its traditional level is if we cut back on our demand, bringing the demand more in line with the reduced inflows. This is where prioritizing comes in. Our basic position here will be that first priority for foreign exchange will be given to those firms or industries that generate reasonable amounts of foreign exchange. If the demand for foreign exchange is not curtailed we will eventually be forced to live with the rate determined by the market. This is where holding strain and varying our taste come in.........http://www.trinidadexpress.com/20170927 ... rgy-sector
You can make your determination of what to expect next week based on KCR's statments today in his “Spotlight on Trinidad and Tobago's Financial Circumstance: The Road Ahead” today.
shake d livin wake d dead wrote:so wah rowly saying
shake d livin wake d dead wrote:to me it sounding like the following:
usd 8-1
electricity going up by a whole lot
traffic fines going up
alcho and cigarette as usual
gas subsidies gone
something about property tax
sMASH wrote:Oil demands aren't waning enough yet due to renewable energy. Presently it's due to oversupply.
But as time goes on that factor will become significant and the supply/demand for gas will not be favorable.
I have a idea. Let's cut off tobago from petro dollars.
Okay more to that idea, cut off tobago from the money and use it as a live test for sustainable growth.
See what can be done in Tobago to be sufficient without petro money. And something works, translate it across to the main land.
First off the bats are ecotourism and food production.
Monkey Man wrote:like i said watch and see there is gonna be a Furry Bank Tax imposition
timelapse wrote:Monkey Man wrote:like i said watch and see there is gonna be a Furry Bank Tax imposition
Is this where monkeys make their deposits?
Monkey Man wrote:timelapse wrote:Monkey Man wrote:like i said watch and see there is gonna be a Furry Bank Tax imposition
Is this where monkeys make their deposits?
I guess you dunno about furry burgers too
Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 58 guests