Flow
Flow
Flow
TriniTuner.com  |  Latest Event:  

Forums

$6000 for poor babies

this is how we do it.......

Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods

User avatar
pioneer
TriniTuner 24-7
Posts: 16934
Joined: April 18th, 2003, 12:27 am
Location: OM-TT.COM
Contact:

Re: $6000 for poor babies

Postby pioneer » September 9th, 2014, 6:40 pm

You all think politicians don't analyse trends and don't know what will happen next?

This plan was carefully thought out. The middle class is the biggest threat to any government and political parties. They tend to think freely and vote as such. Politicians fully well know middle income families have less offspring, that data could have easily been captured from the 2011 housing and population census. Middle income ppl go to school and have decent jobs. They rarely depend on the state for anything such as CEPEP/URP/food card/baby fund.

Now think poor families, they have tons of kids which more than likely gonna grow up to be dunce/garbage men/sufferers/cepep/dependents. Now you have a policy which more or less encourages them to multiply even more, which means more dunce/dependents in society who live for state handouts. Therefore, politicians can literally give them chit to eat, they will still vote for them.

Now you have a larger population of dunce vs middle income.

It creates the perfect state of dependency, eventually eradicating the middle class and making them null and void. They would no longer have much political say or even spending power, cuz by then inflation would be sky high and their salaries would diminish after one grocery visit. Then the state has a perfectly stratified society with the very rich vs the very poor, one always controlling the other.

Kams thought this out clearly, and pnm would not change it if they come back into power.

Crackpot
I LUV THIS PLACE
Posts: 1098
Joined: June 2nd, 2009, 7:17 pm

Re: $6000 for poor babies

Postby Crackpot » September 9th, 2014, 6:46 pm

^^ And my username is Crackpot ? :|

User avatar
pioneer
TriniTuner 24-7
Posts: 16934
Joined: April 18th, 2003, 12:27 am
Location: OM-TT.COM
Contact:

Re: $6000 for poor babies

Postby pioneer » September 9th, 2014, 6:46 pm

RIP middle class

Haiti here we come.

Time to migrate to canada.

brams112
punchin NOS
Posts: 3697
Joined: July 15th, 2008, 8:58 pm
Location: trinidad

Re: $6000 for poor babies

Postby brams112 » September 9th, 2014, 7:01 pm

Now is plenty women with children who will want houses but have no way to pay for it.Dont know what the fcuk Kamla was thinking about when they came up with this sheit oui.

User avatar
pioneer
TriniTuner 24-7
Posts: 16934
Joined: April 18th, 2003, 12:27 am
Location: OM-TT.COM
Contact:

Re: $6000 for poor babies

Postby pioneer » September 9th, 2014, 7:54 pm

So if PNM is voted in, would they change it?

User avatar
*OUTSIDER*
Riding on 17's
Posts: 1508
Joined: March 12th, 2008, 6:38 pm
Location: South Ah D Border

Re: $6000 for poor babies

Postby *OUTSIDER* » September 9th, 2014, 8:23 pm

Image

User avatar
Morpheus
TriniTuner 24-7
Posts: 10741
Joined: July 22nd, 2004, 2:24 am

Re: $6000 for poor babies

Postby Morpheus » September 9th, 2014, 9:43 pm

^^Point number 5 is strong.....:|

User avatar
pioneer
TriniTuner 24-7
Posts: 16934
Joined: April 18th, 2003, 12:27 am
Location: OM-TT.COM
Contact:

Re: $6000 for poor babies

Postby pioneer » September 9th, 2014, 9:51 pm

And that's where we're heading and all politicians would have zero problem with it.

Crackpot
I LUV THIS PLACE
Posts: 1098
Joined: June 2nd, 2009, 7:17 pm

Re: $6000 for poor babies

Postby Crackpot » September 9th, 2014, 10:02 pm

pioneer wrote:And that's where we're heading and UNC would have zero problem with it in order to try and win the next election

User avatar
DVSTT
Trying to catch PATCH AND VEGA
Posts: 6759
Joined: November 28th, 2011, 9:11 pm

Re: $6000 for poor babies

Postby DVSTT » September 9th, 2014, 10:25 pm

Image

User avatar
Slartibartfast
punchin NOS
Posts: 4650
Joined: May 15th, 2012, 4:24 pm
Location: Magrathea

Re: $6000 for poor babies

Postby Slartibartfast » September 9th, 2014, 11:40 pm

If you are unsure that your IQ qualifies you then chances are that it doesn't

User avatar
rfari
TriniTuner 24-7
Posts: 19169
Joined: September 27th, 2009, 11:20 am
Contact:

Re: $6000 for poor babies

Postby rfari » September 10th, 2014, 5:53 am

pioneer wrote:You all think politicians don't analyse trends and don't know what will happen next?

This plan was carefully thought out. The middle class is the biggest threat to any government and political parties. They tend to think freely and vote as such. Politicians fully well know middle income families have less offspring, that data could have easily been captured from the 2011 housing and population census. Middle income ppl go to school and have decent jobs. They rarely depend on the state for anything such as CEPEP/URP/food card/baby fund.

Now think poor families, they have tons of kids which more than likely gonna grow up to be dunce/garbage men/sufferers/cepep/dependents. Now you have a policy which more or less encourages them to multiply even more, which means more dunce/dependents in society who live for state handouts. Therefore, politicians can literally give them chit to eat, they will still vote for them.

Now you have a larger population of dunce vs middle income.

It creates the perfect state of dependency, eventually eradicating the middle class and making them null and void. They would no longer have much political say or even spending power, cuz by then inflation would be sky high and their salaries would diminish after one grocery visit. Then the state has a perfectly stratified society with the very rich vs the very poor, one always controlling the other.

Kams thought this out clearly, and pnm would not change it if they come back into power.

Nice break down. But wouldn't this just boost the pnm support base in the future?

Crackpot
I LUV THIS PLACE
Posts: 1098
Joined: June 2nd, 2009, 7:17 pm

Re: $6000 for poor babies

Postby Crackpot » September 10th, 2014, 7:00 am

Distraction Allocation

User avatar
*OUTSIDER*
Riding on 17's
Posts: 1508
Joined: March 12th, 2008, 6:38 pm
Location: South Ah D Border

Re: $6000 for poor babies

Postby *OUTSIDER* » September 10th, 2014, 7:28 am

Sabriel wrote:
improvednewbie wrote:so wat the ass.if ppl poor and wanna have children this will help them .i eh see the pm do anything rung.if anything she should be complemented cause if the poor ppl didnt get money for their children the children will just suffer a bit more.i feel it is a very good move.poor ppl need alot of help in this country.jus saying.they deserve a good quality of life as well.too much of middle class and rich ppl does look down on poor ppl.screw it.


typical parasitic thinking...
as someone said before "if you can't feed, don't breed" Some of them need to be spayed and neutered
Last edited by *OUTSIDER* on September 10th, 2014, 7:32 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
RBphoto
TriniTuner 24-7
Posts: 7627
Joined: June 26th, 2007, 10:46 am
Location: Pikchatekoutin
Contact:

Re: $6000 for poor babies

Postby RBphoto » September 10th, 2014, 7:29 am

In other inequity news:

People who contribute to NIS get a $3,000.00 pension, and not eligible for $3,500.00 old age pension... is this true?

User avatar
kjaglal76v2
12 pounds of Boost
Posts: 2214
Joined: April 1st, 2014, 4:03 pm
Location: iymc

Re: $6000 for poor babies

Postby kjaglal76v2 » September 10th, 2014, 7:33 am

rfari wrote:
pioneer wrote:You all think politicians don't analyse trends and don't know what will happen next?

This plan was carefully thought out. The middle class is the biggest threat to any government and political parties. They tend to think freely and vote as such. Politicians fully well know middle income families have less offspring, that data could have easily been captured from the 2011 housing and population census. Middle income ppl go to school and have decent jobs. They rarely depend on the state for anything such as CEPEP/URP/food card/baby fund.

Now think poor families, they have tons of kids which more than likely gonna grow up to be dunce/garbage men/sufferers/cepep/dependents. Now you have a policy which more or less encourages them to multiply even more, which means more dunce/dependents in society who live for state handouts. Therefore, politicians can literally give them chit to eat, they will still vote for them.

Now you have a larger population of dunce vs middle income.

It creates the perfect state of dependency, eventually eradicating the middle class and making them null and void. They would no longer have much political say or even spending power, cuz by then inflation would be sky high and their salaries would diminish after one grocery visit. Then the state has a perfectly stratified society with the very rich vs the very poor, one always controlling the other.

Kams thought this out clearly, and pnm would not change it if they come back into power.

Nice break down. But wouldn't this just boost the pnm support base in the future?


YES

User avatar
src1983
18 pounds of Boost
Posts: 2405
Joined: February 17th, 2009, 11:09 am
Location: Somewhere

Re: $6000 for poor babies

Postby src1983 » September 10th, 2014, 7:39 am

This trend in "gimmie gimmie" budgets will not end as politicians don't have the balls to enact changes to propel the country forward.

All they care about is themselves and maintaining their positions

Look how many of them have their kids in foreign countries. They know they are making a mess

User avatar
rfari
TriniTuner 24-7
Posts: 19169
Joined: September 27th, 2009, 11:20 am
Contact:

Re: $6000 for poor babies

Postby rfari » September 10th, 2014, 8:08 am

kjaglal76v2 wrote:
rfari wrote:
pioneer wrote:You all think politicians don't analyse trends and don't know what will happen next?

This plan was carefully thought out. The middle class is the biggest threat to any government and political parties. They tend to think freely and vote as such. Politicians fully well know middle income families have less offspring, that data could have easily been captured from the 2011 housing and population census. Middle income ppl go to school and have decent jobs. They rarely depend on the state for anything such as CEPEP/URP/food card/baby fund.

Now think poor families, they have tons of kids which more than likely gonna grow up to be dunce/garbage men/sufferers/cepep/dependents. Now you have a policy which more or less encourages them to multiply even more, which means more dunce/dependents in society who live for state handouts. Therefore, politicians can literally give them chit to eat, they will still vote for them.

Now you have a larger population of dunce vs middle income.

It creates the perfect state of dependency, eventually eradicating the middle class and making them null and void. They would no longer have much political say or even spending power, cuz by then inflation would be sky high and their salaries would diminish after one grocery visit. Then the state has a perfectly stratified society with the very rich vs the very poor, one always controlling the other.

Kams thought this out clearly, and pnm would not change it if they come back into power.

Nice break down. But wouldn't this just boost the pnm support base in the future?


YES

So in other words, kamala ensuring that the pnm population increase to better their chances at the polls?

User avatar
RBphoto
TriniTuner 24-7
Posts: 7627
Joined: June 26th, 2007, 10:46 am
Location: Pikchatekoutin
Contact:

Re: $6000 for poor babies

Postby RBphoto » September 10th, 2014, 8:39 am

Glad I don't vote anymore.

User avatar
shogun
TriniTuner 24-7
Posts: 14252
Joined: May 6th, 2008, 12:24 pm
Location: Gone Rogue.

Re: $6000 for poor babies

Postby shogun » September 10th, 2014, 11:14 am

People being rewarded for being irresponsible?.

Can't wait for the Baby-Daddy grant, so fellas could at least have a fresh kit for the christening. Funnier still I'm hearing people complaining the grant isn't enough?. Lol. Trini too nice.

User avatar
RBphoto
TriniTuner 24-7
Posts: 7627
Joined: June 26th, 2007, 10:46 am
Location: Pikchatekoutin
Contact:

Re: $6000 for poor babies

Postby RBphoto » September 10th, 2014, 12:28 pm

shogun wrote:People being rewarded for being irresponsible?.

Can't wait for the Baby-Daddy grant, so fellas could at least have a fresh kit for the christening. Funnier still I'm hearing people complaining the grant isn't enough?. Lol. Trini too nice.


What the hell can $500.00 buy for a baby for a whole month? Like I said before, $3,500.00 seem like a good place to start, and should be for ALL parents. One thing I would also like to see is three months paternity leave for fathers and mothers.

redmanjp
TriniTuner 24-7
Posts: 17682
Joined: September 22nd, 2009, 11:01 pm
Contact:

Re: $6000 for poor babies

Postby redmanjp » September 10th, 2014, 12:56 pm

RBphoto wrote:
shogun wrote:People being rewarded for being irresponsible?.

Can't wait for the Baby-Daddy grant, so fellas could at least have a fresh kit for the christening. Funnier still I'm hearing people complaining the grant isn't enough?. Lol. Trini too nice.


What the hell can $500.00 buy for a baby for a whole month? Like I said before, $3,500.00 seem like a good place to start, and should be for ALL parents. One thing I would also like to see is three months paternity leave for fathers and mothers.


tv6 did a story last night where some grocery items for a baby came up to $446 or something so

User avatar
src1983
18 pounds of Boost
Posts: 2405
Joined: February 17th, 2009, 11:09 am
Location: Somewhere

Re: $6000 for poor babies

Postby src1983 » September 10th, 2014, 1:01 pm

Doesn't matter.

I shouldn't be paying for poor people kids, they do not improve my life, they suck our tax dollars which can be better utilised

More poor people having kids, equates to more crime, more waiting at the hospital, less places in schools etc.

So the cost is much more than $500.00

User avatar
kjaglal76v2
12 pounds of Boost
Posts: 2214
Joined: April 1st, 2014, 4:03 pm
Location: iymc

Re: $6000 for poor babies

Postby kjaglal76v2 » September 10th, 2014, 2:45 pm

src1983 wrote:Doesn't matter.

I shouldn't be paying for PNM people kids, they do not improve my life, they suck our tax dollars which can be better utilised

More PNM people having kids, equates to more crime, more waiting at the hospital, less places in schools etc.

So the cost is much more than $500.00

Gladiator
punchin NOS
Posts: 3935
Joined: April 20th, 2006, 9:43 am

Re: $6000 for poor babies

Postby Gladiator » September 10th, 2014, 3:34 pm

redmanjp wrote:
RBphoto wrote:
shogun wrote:People being rewarded for being irresponsible?.

Can't wait for the Baby-Daddy grant, so fellas could at least have a fresh kit for the christening. Funnier still I'm hearing people complaining the grant isn't enough?. Lol. Trini too nice.


What the hell can $500.00 buy for a baby for a whole month? Like I said before, $3,500.00 seem like a good place to start, and should be for ALL parents. One thing I would also like to see is three months paternity leave for fathers and mothers.


tv6 did a story last night where some grocery items for a baby came up to $446 or something so


Yeah the entire story backfired... the intent was to show that $500 was not enough to buy ting for the chile.

Low and behold when the cashier add up everything it reach $446 and that included "nutritious cereals, meat and other food" for the mother who need that to breast feed. LOL

User avatar
Spitfir3
punchin NOS
Posts: 3654
Joined: September 1st, 2009, 11:11 pm

Re: $6000 for poor babies

Postby Spitfir3 » September 10th, 2014, 3:44 pm

show that $500 is not enough? the media should realize these people should be lucky they even getting that much in the first place

kpb back herself into a corner with this most citizens who don't rely on the government to mind their children would disapprove of this while the ones who receive the grant will just come back and say daiz all?

small amount of people would actually be grateful and use the grant to their best but you wouldn't hear sheit about that

User avatar
RBphoto
TriniTuner 24-7
Posts: 7627
Joined: June 26th, 2007, 10:46 am
Location: Pikchatekoutin
Contact:

Re: $6000 for poor babies

Postby RBphoto » September 10th, 2014, 3:58 pm

I don't think that that grocery that they did would last a month.

Gladiator
punchin NOS
Posts: 3935
Joined: April 20th, 2006, 9:43 am

Re: $6000 for poor babies

Postby Gladiator » September 10th, 2014, 5:40 pm

RBphoto wrote:I don't think that that grocery that they did would last a month.


Coming down to the end the reporter try to save face and ask the powderneck (who have a 1 yr old and is currently 6 mths pregnant BTW) "how long will these things last" Powderneck say "ah little more than a month and ting" :drinking:

bluefete
TriniTuner 24-7
Posts: 14676
Joined: November 12th, 2008, 10:56 pm
Location: POS

Re: $6000 for poor babies

Postby bluefete » September 10th, 2014, 6:21 pm

Pios: You just brutal yuh know.

Anyways, if the money finds its way towards the truly needy and is supported by a mandatory series of birth control courses, I don't have a problem.

The parent should then show tangible efforts at finding employment.

It should also be restricted to one child every 5 years or so.

User avatar
pioneer
TriniTuner 24-7
Posts: 16934
Joined: April 18th, 2003, 12:27 am
Location: OM-TT.COM
Contact:

Re: $6000 for poor babies

Postby pioneer » September 10th, 2014, 6:25 pm

Should also be required to enroll in a program to further their education/skills.

Must show evidence of registration, attendance and completion else money has to be repaid.

Advertisement

Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google Adsense [Bot] and 89 guests