Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
pioneer wrote:And that's where we're heading and UNC would have zero problem with it in order to try and win the next election
pioneer wrote:You all think politicians don't analyse trends and don't know what will happen next?
This plan was carefully thought out. The middle class is the biggest threat to any government and political parties. They tend to think freely and vote as such. Politicians fully well know middle income families have less offspring, that data could have easily been captured from the 2011 housing and population census. Middle income ppl go to school and have decent jobs. They rarely depend on the state for anything such as CEPEP/URP/food card/baby fund.
Now think poor families, they have tons of kids which more than likely gonna grow up to be dunce/garbage men/sufferers/cepep/dependents. Now you have a policy which more or less encourages them to multiply even more, which means more dunce/dependents in society who live for state handouts. Therefore, politicians can literally give them chit to eat, they will still vote for them.
Now you have a larger population of dunce vs middle income.
It creates the perfect state of dependency, eventually eradicating the middle class and making them null and void. They would no longer have much political say or even spending power, cuz by then inflation would be sky high and their salaries would diminish after one grocery visit. Then the state has a perfectly stratified society with the very rich vs the very poor, one always controlling the other.
Kams thought this out clearly, and pnm would not change it if they come back into power.
as someone said before "if you can't feed, don't breed" Some of them need to be spayed and neuteredSabriel wrote:improvednewbie wrote:so wat the ass.if ppl poor and wanna have children this will help them .i eh see the pm do anything rung.if anything she should be complemented cause if the poor ppl didnt get money for their children the children will just suffer a bit more.i feel it is a very good move.poor ppl need alot of help in this country.jus saying.they deserve a good quality of life as well.too much of middle class and rich ppl does look down on poor ppl.screw it.
typical parasitic thinking...
rfari wrote:pioneer wrote:You all think politicians don't analyse trends and don't know what will happen next?
This plan was carefully thought out. The middle class is the biggest threat to any government and political parties. They tend to think freely and vote as such. Politicians fully well know middle income families have less offspring, that data could have easily been captured from the 2011 housing and population census. Middle income ppl go to school and have decent jobs. They rarely depend on the state for anything such as CEPEP/URP/food card/baby fund.
Now think poor families, they have tons of kids which more than likely gonna grow up to be dunce/garbage men/sufferers/cepep/dependents. Now you have a policy which more or less encourages them to multiply even more, which means more dunce/dependents in society who live for state handouts. Therefore, politicians can literally give them chit to eat, they will still vote for them.
Now you have a larger population of dunce vs middle income.
It creates the perfect state of dependency, eventually eradicating the middle class and making them null and void. They would no longer have much political say or even spending power, cuz by then inflation would be sky high and their salaries would diminish after one grocery visit. Then the state has a perfectly stratified society with the very rich vs the very poor, one always controlling the other.
Kams thought this out clearly, and pnm would not change it if they come back into power.
Nice break down. But wouldn't this just boost the pnm support base in the future?
kjaglal76v2 wrote:rfari wrote:pioneer wrote:You all think politicians don't analyse trends and don't know what will happen next?
This plan was carefully thought out. The middle class is the biggest threat to any government and political parties. They tend to think freely and vote as such. Politicians fully well know middle income families have less offspring, that data could have easily been captured from the 2011 housing and population census. Middle income ppl go to school and have decent jobs. They rarely depend on the state for anything such as CEPEP/URP/food card/baby fund.
Now think poor families, they have tons of kids which more than likely gonna grow up to be dunce/garbage men/sufferers/cepep/dependents. Now you have a policy which more or less encourages them to multiply even more, which means more dunce/dependents in society who live for state handouts. Therefore, politicians can literally give them chit to eat, they will still vote for them.
Now you have a larger population of dunce vs middle income.
It creates the perfect state of dependency, eventually eradicating the middle class and making them null and void. They would no longer have much political say or even spending power, cuz by then inflation would be sky high and their salaries would diminish after one grocery visit. Then the state has a perfectly stratified society with the very rich vs the very poor, one always controlling the other.
Kams thought this out clearly, and pnm would not change it if they come back into power.
Nice break down. But wouldn't this just boost the pnm support base in the future?
YES
shogun wrote:People being rewarded for being irresponsible?.
Can't wait for the Baby-Daddy grant, so fellas could at least have a fresh kit for the christening. Funnier still I'm hearing people complaining the grant isn't enough?. Lol. Trini too nice.
RBphoto wrote:shogun wrote:People being rewarded for being irresponsible?.
Can't wait for the Baby-Daddy grant, so fellas could at least have a fresh kit for the christening. Funnier still I'm hearing people complaining the grant isn't enough?. Lol. Trini too nice.
What the hell can $500.00 buy for a baby for a whole month? Like I said before, $3,500.00 seem like a good place to start, and should be for ALL parents. One thing I would also like to see is three months paternity leave for fathers and mothers.
src1983 wrote:Doesn't matter.
I shouldn't be paying for PNM people kids, they do not improve my life, they suck our tax dollars which can be better utilised
More PNM people having kids, equates to more crime, more waiting at the hospital, less places in schools etc.
So the cost is much more than $500.00
redmanjp wrote:RBphoto wrote:shogun wrote:People being rewarded for being irresponsible?.
Can't wait for the Baby-Daddy grant, so fellas could at least have a fresh kit for the christening. Funnier still I'm hearing people complaining the grant isn't enough?. Lol. Trini too nice.
What the hell can $500.00 buy for a baby for a whole month? Like I said before, $3,500.00 seem like a good place to start, and should be for ALL parents. One thing I would also like to see is three months paternity leave for fathers and mothers.
tv6 did a story last night where some grocery items for a baby came up to $446 or something so
RBphoto wrote:I don't think that that grocery that they did would last a month.
Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”
Users browsing this forum: Google Adsense [Bot] and 89 guests