Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
As it is now, everybody is in the clear except Rowlie who has accused and must prove.
4x4 wrote:Exactly Redman, Rowley has no investigate powers. At the same time he cannot take basket from anyone who drops something in his mailbox. At least do fact finding or ask somebody.
Mr. Speaker, when I saw the emails, my first reaction was to ensure that it was
not frivolous and, therefore, I did not take it to my colleagues, I did not take it to
the media, I did not publicize it; I wanted to be satisfied that what this whistleblower
had presented to the Office of the Opposition was information that should
be taken seriously, and when I was satisfied that that was so, I took the
information to the Office of the President.
Rfari, All respect but this is where we differ. You cannot submit false documents as evidence. They can investigate all they want. Even if something is true they can do nothing with it. It will never make it to court.
So do we launch an investigation on a false basis and hope something sticks? The credibility of the OL is shot, and the "evidence" being the emails which are fake means that the outcome of any investigation is already compromised.rfari wrote:4x4 wrote:Exactly Redman, Rowley has no investigate powers. At the same time he cannot take basket from anyone who drops something in his mailbox. At least do fact finding or ask somebody.
Mr. Speaker, when I saw the emails, my first reaction was to ensure that it was
not frivolous and, therefore, I did not take it to my colleagues, I did not take it to
the media, I did not publicize it; I wanted to be satisfied that what this whistleblower
had presented to the Office of the Opposition was information that should
be taken seriously, and when I was satisfied that that was so, I took the
information to the Office of the President.
Rfari, All respect but this is where we differ. You cannot submit false documents as evidence. They can investigate all they want. Even if something is true they can do nothing with it. It will never make it to court.
So what we saying is that if (IF) wrongdoing was uncovered based on the 'emailgate' investigation by the police that it must be discarded?
rollingstock wrote:Fcuk Kwame he shoulda pay Mukesh he money
Rory Phoulorie wrote:rollingstock wrote:Fcuk Kwame he shoulda pay Mukesh he money
But why Mukesh didn't pay Kwame for the B14 windscreen? It's not like a B14 windscreen costs more than a 20 ounce Coke in a parlour.
eliteauto wrote:Alan Karim really pulling your LEASH yes, bringing equally as stupid questions to tuner that he is posting on FB
rfari wrote:Rory, stock and ED. Smh
4x4 wrote:Exactly Redman, Rowley has no investigate powers. At the same time he cannot take basket from anyone who drops something in his mailbox. At least do fact finding or ask somebody.
Mr. Speaker, when I saw the emails, my first reaction was to ensure that it was
not frivolous and, therefore, I did not take it to my colleagues, I did not take it to
the media, I did not publicize it; I wanted to be satisfied that what this whistleblower
had presented to the Office of the Opposition was information that should
be taken seriously, and when I was satisfied that that was so, I took the
information to the Office of the President.
.
Rory Phoulorie wrote:rfari wrote:Rory, stock and ED. Smh
Do you really think UML is capable of independent thought that you could have a constructive discussion with him? You are just "spinning top in mud" in continuing to try and engage him to rationalise and justify the blind foolishness that he posts in the threads.
For all you know Suruj's daughter, who is also on TriniTuner, could be his handler on this website.
EFFECTIC DESIGNS wrote:Really doubt its the same person.
BTW isn't UML the guy who had the bess EK3 from South? back when tuner used to have the "garage thing" and people would post their car on their profile. Assuming it was his Civic in the pic then yeah.
Redman wrote:. . .Either Keith or Kamla is seriously crooked.
I say both but thats just me
rollingstock wrote:Zoom is a mid forties afro trini that is from South but works in the oil sector in the UK
rspann wrote:Fari don't have a clue. You really believe any Mukesh brave enough to go Lavantee to shoot any Kwame?
all sheit talk aside, Kamla is entitled to defend her "good name" and she is right to call on the IC and the police to do fast , the same way everybody calling on her to wait on the Police to clear her name before she says she is cleared,they should wait and don't pronounce on the emails until something is proven against her.
If somebody accused any of us here of something and we think we are innocent ,we going all out to prove we innocent, if the police delays pronouncing on the issue,they going into an elections with a disadvantage. If they say it is fake,Rowley will be at the disadvantage. I am not saying who lying or who telling the truth, I'm just trying to show why everyone is reacting the way they are.
Elections has to be called within a certain time, the government is an elected one (by a large majority) why the fuss? They are going to either get out because of their deeds (perceived or true)or they will win. If they win again ,what's next? Rioting and bloodshed? or another five years of bacchanal?
Why can't we just wait and make the decisions with our finger and accept whatever the results may be?
Allergic2BunnyEars wrote:rspann wrote:Fari don't have a clue. You really believe any Mukesh brave enough to go Lavantee to shoot any Kwame?
all sheit talk aside, Kamla is entitled to defend her "good name" and she is right to call on the IC and the police to do fast , the same way everybody calling on her to wait on the Police to clear her name before she says she is cleared,they should wait and don't pronounce on the emails until something is proven against her.
If somebody accused any of us here of something and we think we are innocent ,we going all out to prove we innocent, if the police delays pronouncing on the issue,they going into an elections with a disadvantage. If they say it is fake,Rowley will be at the disadvantage. I am not saying who lying or who telling the truth, I'm just trying to show why everyone is reacting the way they are.
Elections has to be called within a certain time, the government is an elected one (by a large majority) why the fuss? They are going to either get out because of their deeds (perceived or true)or they will win. If they win again ,what's next? Rioting and bloodshed? or another five years of bacchanal?
Why can't we just wait and make the decisions with our finger and accept whatever the results may be?
Maybe we like the beat up. I always tell people just do what you hadda do when you stain your finger cuz is not like we as a people take anything serious enough to protest continuously during a term.
UML wrote:eliteauto wrote:
just about sums it up
Ramadhar: DPPs make mistakes
Geisha Kowlessar
Published:
Saturday, May 16, 2015
COP supporters during the party's public meeting at Railway Road, Arima, on Thursday night. PHOTO: MARCUS GONZALES
Questions were raised about the Office of the Director of Public Prosecutions and criticisms of Opposition Leader Dr Keith Rowley were expressed over the Emailgate issue, at a political meeting held by the Congress of the People (COP) in Arouca on Thursday night.
The COP’s political leader and Minister of Legal Affairs, Prakash Ramadhar, came out in full defence of Prime Minister Kamla Persad-Bissessar in the Emailgate issue.
In a release on Wednesday, Deputy Director of Public Prosecutions Joan Honore-Paul criticised Prime Minister Kamla Persad-Bissessar for her suggestion that she and her colleagues were cleared in the Emailgate probe, saying the police were far from done with their investigations and the case was still wide open
She had also criticised Persad-Bissessar for releasing contents of reports provided to the police from the US Department of Justice, saying the treaty under which this information was provided prohibited anyone else other than the national security parties probing the matter from using it.
While he respected the DPP’s office, Ramadhar said, “I want to say they get it a little bit wrong. I dealt with these people in court and they not superhuman. They not beyond mistake and they not beyond error.”
Ramadhar insisted that the PM was right when she said the emails were fake. He said Rowley read into the Hansard what were “clearly fabricated emails.”
“He made allegations against the Prime Minister and other senior office holders of conspiracy to murder, conspiracy to pervert the course of justice.
“Two years after they are still holding on to this fallacy, this fabrication as if it were true. He received it and he kept it for six months without telling anyone? If he believed it what would a responsible human being do? Not go to the police? But he sat on it for six months. Therefore, logically, as far as I am concerned he did not believe it,” Ramadhar said.
He said, instead, Rowley put it before the Parliament so that the whole world heard that the Prime Minister and other senior government officials conspired to do all these “evil things.”
Saying Persad-Bissessar could not be faulted for taking steps to clear her name, Ramadhar insisted that search engine Google “checked and checked but there was no such emails.”
Turning his guns on the DPP’s office, Ramadhar said, “Now I respect the DPP’s office. I respect what they have to say but I do not have to agree.
“As far as I recall every citizen, man, woman and child is presumed innocent until proven guilty. There has not been a single charge laid against anyone. There have been only fabricated allegations made against these people.
“How could it then be said that they have not been cleared? Cleared of what? An allegation? When in fact it was proven to everyone there is no such legitimacy to the emails,” Ramadhar said.
He made mention of the Calder Hart issue, saying to date that matter had not been resolved.
“So if we are to sit down like cunumunu and wait and election come and those allegations are still hanging over the head are we not entitled to defend ourselves?
“And I say ourselves because we are People’s Partnership, because what affects the Prime Minister affects us,” Ramadhar said.
He also accused Rowley of chasing former prime minister Patrick Manning out of the PNM, charging that a “mob-like” mentality had now taken over that party.
‘Police mischief’
Wading in on the Police Service, Ramadhar said it had been some 13 years since the case involving Sadiq Baksh began and was still hanging in the balance.
Missiles and cocaine were discovered in Baksh’s water tank in 2002.
“We have a long bitter history of mischievous police action. I am not for a moment suggesting anything but I have to be alert and I learnt a long time ago if you suspect or you smell anything going wrong put a light on it. T&T put a light on what is going on with that email investigation,” Ramadhar added.
He said if this was not done then the PP Government would go into the general election without a conclusion to the case by either the police or the Integrity Commission.
“You have the allegations but you never know some charge could emanate from it.”
http://m.guardian.co.tt/news/2015-05-15 ... e-mistakes
Redman wrote:4x4 wrote:Exactly Redman, Rowley has no investigate powers. At the same time he cannot take basket from anyone who drops something in his mailbox. At least do fact finding or ask somebody.
Mr. Speaker, when I saw the emails, my first reaction was to ensure that it was
not frivolous and, therefore, I did not take it to my colleagues, I did not take it to
the media, I did not publicize it; I wanted to be satisfied that what this whistleblower
had presented to the Office of the Opposition was information that should
be taken seriously, and when I was satisfied that that was so, I took the
information to the Office of the President.
.
Therefore the issue is whether KR believed the emails to be fake.
Maybe he was convinced that they were legit....or he ignored the actual email and confirmed the content as being true.
My problem is that we as a people are confronted with two main contenders of the 2 main offices in the land and we know that at least ONE OF THEM IS WILLING TO LIE AND OR KILL FOR POLITICAL GAIN.
Either Keith or Kamla is seriously crooked.
I say both but thats just me
Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 53 guests