Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
you have examples? bring it! ...and please...tell me where in Christianity there is a ceremonial law to not shave one's hair...I hope you did not get that mixed up with a moral law ..such as don't go sleeping with another man's wife ....I hope you are not confused with the word law and what is regarded by that term as far as the bible is concerned.Humes wrote:megadoc1 wrote:let me give you a hint those instructions were for those under the law (please adam b don't take this to mean that Christians don't have a moral standard ) most Christians would have been gentiles and are under grace!
![]()
![]()
![]()
Hear nah...alyuh men so fulla sh!t it does amaze me sometimes yuh know.
That same passage you just quote there has invalidated countless arguments you've made and "sincs" you've condemned in this thread (and will surely condemn again).
Worse than lawyers, yes. Bullsh!tters.
Stephon. wrote:Um.............. you have got to be crazy If you think I am going to read that wall of text.
megadoc1 wrote:Stephon. wrote:Um.............. you have got to be crazy If you think I am going to read that wall of text.
well that's your choice ! you can continue with your line of questioning and feel your are on to something..if its that what makes you comfortable
Stephon. wrote:Today a pastor was talking to me while going through my iPod. He was aaking me why I had so many songs and no Gospel music.
So I told him because I don't listen to Gospel music, though I did admit that I do like some Gospel songs.
Then he pulled out his tablet and started quoting Bible verses for me :/
megadoc1 wrote:....who knows the pastor probably gave you a schooling on Christianity and you probably ignore that as well
I just don't believe we have the full story here! who knows he is saying its a pastor but the person probably isn't ..megadoc1 wrote:what kind of pastor is that?
megadoc1 wrote:who knows the pastor probably..........
megadoc1 wrote:Act 15:28 For it seemed good to the Holy Ghost, and to us, to lay upon you no greater burden than these necessary things
AdamB wrote:"ANOTHER" Comforter you say??!!!
Another!!!
Comforter!!! Why not the words "Holy Ghost" used??
this is the word used in the original Greek ,(which is still available for you to to research) how come when you defend the quran you always speak about the original language but when it comes to the bible you act as their isn't any and all there is available are the English translations? why?megadoc1 wrote:παράκλητος
paraklētos
par-ak'-lay-tos
An intercessor, consoler: - advocate, comforter.
this garbage you just wrote brings nothing to the discussion but only serves to show your unwillingness to understand the christian faith ..this comforter is the third person of the trinity,Jesus.... ,being the second,was talking about the third as the other .....note: I am not writing this for you! but for the sake of others cause as we all know by now, you are not interested in learning what the christian faith is ..you are acting as if you are "programed"..AdamB wrote:Why, I though you all said that the Trinity comprises The Father, The Son and the Holy Ghost.
But this is "another" Comforter, then there must be others. So maybe you need to change that Trinity thing to something reflecting more than one god, oh sorry, person.
that's why you need to address d spike's post and tell us when did this change took place ..the koran does not teach that the bible was altered so this change have to take place after the koran was written, but here lies your problem..AdamB wrote:Muslims believe that the scriptures have been changed, the name of our prophet Ahmad was there written but removed.
Also, the Spirit of Truth, refers to a name of our prophet which means "The Truthful One".
Jesus informed his disciples that Muhammad was to come and that "he (Jesus) had to go in order for Muhammad to come to "teach you all things".
I do believe in muhamad I just believe he is a fraud..that,s all now don't get offended I am entitled to my beliefs ...... you seem to have no problem dissing my "three gods" so be coolAdamB wrote:Of course, you can dispute our claims but the fact remains that we do not disbelieve in Jesus but you disbelieve in Muhammad and anyone who disbelieves in any one of the messengers has disbelieved in all. Hence, is a disbeliever with GOD.
when I said that gentile's don't have to follow the law given to Moses I meant that they don't achieve righteousness by doing something according to a law or rule book..but through faith in Jesus they are justified righteous and and now, should walk in righteousness because its their new "born again" nature to do so.....to me ,leaving the position of being naturally made righteous and naturally doing righteousness through faith in Christ( the perfect law of liberty), to go on to a book of rules about how to live righteous and how to go about doing it ..is only a backwards step it's best I become a JewAdamB wrote:The same way you say that Gentiles don't have to follow the Law given to Moses, we say that it is upon you to leave what you have and follow the next one, the Law of Islam.
AdamB wrote:pioneer wrote:Did someone say Al-Haqq....isn't that the bbq guy?
The bbq guy is Al-Haaq NOT AL-HAQQ!!!
DFC wrote:Sorry to be off topic eh, but God spoke to me last night and instructed me to go buy some roast pork.
If God had a favorite food, i would guess it had to be roast pork. It tastes soo good, that it surely is Divine !
I would imagine , Heaven full with pork cooked in every imaginable way.
God really know what he was doing when he created the pig.
Bizzare wrote:ok, so now you're compromising with other faiths?? Is that where you've reached??
You're saying that your God is down with a man who believes in the Quran although the bible makes it very clear that that's idolatry? Tsk Tsk Tsk...
John 6:70 (KJV) wrote:Jesus answered them, Have not I chosen you twelve, and one of you is a devil?
bizare tell me what you think about this passageBizzare wrote:According to the bible, Yes!
I've asked this question numerous times and left even Pastors pondering. Some say there's text in the bible that says that all men will know about the name of Jesus, and they claim that God will get through to each man somehow. We know that's simply untrue. There are "untouched" tribes in many parts of the world. Those who think they've all heard of Jesus Christ are simply out of touch with reality and choose to live blinded. But, ACCORDING TO THE BIBLE, No sinner (unsaved) can enter the Kingdom of God. I'm sure even you know that the bible made that clear. And you also know that the bible says every man was born a sinner. AND you also know that there is only one way to be saved.
you know I had this question put to me many times but after pondering on it I came to realize that the same way there is a possibility that some won't hear the gospel the same possibility exists that if they did, they probably would not believe.it or reject it and to confirm this is simple, most of the times the person who is asking these questions does not believe and only uses this question to refute the faith...so if it is possible for an unbeliever to hear it but not believe why do they think that the ones who did not hear the gospel will believe? God knows, the bible actually teaches that he made himself known to themBizzare wrote:What about those that never heard of Jesus Christ? It's not their fault, right? Does that make sense to you that a man who had no chance of hearing the Gospel will enter the placed described in the bible as Hell?
true many people die without hearing the gospel even in places where there are many churchesBizzare wrote:There's so much from that post I want to take you up on, but let me start with saying: By reading your post, I can tell that you DO agree that there are individuals the gospel may never reach. Correct?
how so? why does the fact that people die without hearing the gospel contradict the bible ?Bizzare wrote:That right there would contradict the word of God. If that is so, then God must be a liar?
it did say every nation but that does not man every person..and "every tongue" is in respect to language .Bizzare wrote: Numerous passages in the bible suggest that the word of God shall reach ALL nations. Revelation 5 even went further to say EVERY TONGUE.
agreed! but none of your arguments is sufficient enough to prove or even suggest a contradiction! just a need dig deeper.Bizzare wrote:The bible is supposed to be based on truth. What God says is eternal and doesn't change. His word should not contradict itself nor compromise for any specific situation. IT MUST REMAIN CONSISTENT.
I believe that all babies go to heaven(even aborted ones) .but I must say, there was a time I believed otherwiseBizzare wrote:With that said, another question I've had. We are all born sinners right. There's one way to heaven, through salvation, right? Salvation requires self-awareness that you are a sinner and confession ok. So question, where do babies go when they die if they haven't had a chance to confess their sins in self-awareness? Remember they were already born sinners? Are you saying that all babies go to hell or the word of God CHANGES to make this an exception so that they can go to heaven?
Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”
Users browsing this forum: The_Honourable and 72 guests