Flow
Flow
Flow
TriniTuner.com  |  Latest Event:  

Forums

PNM in Gov't (2020-2025)

this is how we do it.......

Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods

User avatar
The_Honourable
TriniTuner 24-7
Posts: 10515
Joined: June 14th, 2009, 3:45 pm
Location: Together We Conspire, Together We Deceive

Re: Re: PNM in Gov't

Postby The_Honourable » January 27th, 2021, 12:52 am

paid_influencer wrote:
love these history lessons from Dr Meighoo


Kirk bringing that knowledge. He might end up being much better suited for the PR post than Anita, time will tell.

User avatar
Habit7
TriniTuner 24-7
Posts: 12156
Joined: April 20th, 2009, 10:20 pm

Re: Re: PNM in Gov't

Postby Habit7 » January 27th, 2021, 7:52 am

UNC prior to THA election:
We have nothing to do in Tobago, stop dragging us into the THA elections!

After THA election:
This is refreshing news to the ppl of Trinidad and Tobago! Hear our opinion...

User avatar
death365
Shifting into 6th
Posts: 2126
Joined: June 24th, 2013, 2:30 pm
Location: San Juan

Re: Re: PNM in Gov't

Postby death365 » January 27th, 2021, 1:11 pm

I am completely sure this had nothing to do with her rambling vice UNC and its not forced :fist:

**** originally posted in wrong thread. *****

https://www.guardian.co.tt/news/legore-resigns-from-the-morning-brew-6.2.1281278.996b550b85

Natalee Legore has resigned from the Morning Brew programme effective Friday, January 29, 2021.

Ms Legore gave the company one month’s notice on December 30, 2020, indicating that she had decided to pursue a new career path.

GML managing director Brandon Khan said at the time, Ms Legore’s resignation came as a surprise and expressed his appreciation of the efforts she made to host the dynamic morning programme during the past six months.

Khan said GML has proposed other editorial opportunities to Legore and he was hopeful that there will be a continuing relationship with Guardian Media in the future. Legore said she was considering all opportunities at this time.


Managing editor Rosemarie Sant said Legore brought her own unique style to the Morning Brew and wished her all the best in her new endeavour.

Jessie May Ventour, a veteran broadcaster with more than a decade of experience as a Current Affairs programming host, will replace Legore commencing Monday, February 1, 2021.

We are confident that Ms Ventour will be a positive addition in GML’s thrust to produce the best morning show in T&T.

User avatar
Dizzy28
TriniTuner 24-7
Posts: 18948
Joined: February 8th, 2010, 8:54 am
Location: People's Republic of Bananas

Re: Re: PNM in Gov't

Postby Dizzy28 » January 27th, 2021, 1:43 pm

^ She may or may not have had an issue when she got Akash as a cohost. There is a snarky FB post she wrote in that time on the issue of having a co-host
Woke Baes locally were also triggered

Redman
TriniTuner 24-7
Posts: 10430
Joined: August 19th, 2004, 2:48 pm

Re: Re: PNM in Gov't

Postby Redman » January 27th, 2021, 2:58 pm

Good riddance.
She is a bad choice ....and she has a face for radio

User avatar
sMASH
TunerGod
Posts: 25628
Joined: January 11th, 2005, 4:30 am

Re: Re: PNM in Gov't

Postby sMASH » January 27th, 2021, 3:42 pm

The_Honourable wrote:
paid_influencer wrote:
love these history lessons from Dr Meighoo


Kirk bringing that knowledge. He might end up being much better suited for the PR post than Anita, time will tell.

i like kirk, he have really knowledge and history. but he more like a history book, when PR, especially for a political party, u need to bring tiktok energy.
he more suited to be the official Historian or data specialist.

Numb3r4
Shifting into 6th
Posts: 1989
Joined: May 22nd, 2013, 8:48 am
Location: Fyzabad

Re: Re: PNM in Gov't

Postby Numb3r4 » January 27th, 2021, 6:49 pm

What was the issue with Ms. Legore?

I thought she came with experience, was good on I95.5.

Akash in trouble too, any videos or such?

Gladiator
punchin NOS
Posts: 3937
Joined: April 20th, 2006, 9:43 am

Re: Re: PNM in Gov't

Postby Gladiator » January 27th, 2021, 7:38 pm

Redman wrote:Good riddance.
She is a bad choice ....and she has a face for radio


First time I agree with you...

matr1x
TriniTuner 24-7
Posts: 8247
Joined: February 25th, 2017, 7:46 am

Re: Re: PNM in Gov't

Postby matr1x » January 27th, 2021, 7:46 pm

Ppl who worked with her noted her intense racist ideas

Redress10
30 pounds of Boost
Posts: 2642
Joined: July 15th, 2014, 1:04 am

Re: Re: PNM in Gov't

Postby Redress10 » January 27th, 2021, 7:53 pm

matr1x wrote:Ppl who worked with her noted her intense racist ideas


Like what?

User avatar
paid_influencer
TriniTuner 24-7
Posts: 9057
Joined: November 18th, 2017, 4:15 pm

Re: Re: PNM in Gov't

Postby paid_influencer » January 27th, 2021, 8:17 pm

I have figured out the solution to the THA deadlock

maxresdefault.jpg

User avatar
Habit7
TriniTuner 24-7
Posts: 12156
Joined: April 20th, 2009, 10:20 pm

Re: Re: PNM in Gov't

Postby Habit7 » January 27th, 2021, 9:01 pm

Farley and Watson said on Monday night PDP should rule as they got the popular vote.

EBC announced the PNM got the popular vote.

Farley said on Wednesday it doesn't matter.

User avatar
paid_influencer
TriniTuner 24-7
Posts: 9057
Joined: November 18th, 2017, 4:15 pm

Re: Re: PNM in Gov't

Postby paid_influencer » January 27th, 2021, 9:21 pm

^ Farley and Watson don't matter

User avatar
De Dragon
TriniTuner 24-7
Posts: 17912
Joined: January 27th, 2004, 3:49 am
Location: Enjoying my little miracles............

Re: Re: PNM in Gov't

Postby De Dragon » January 27th, 2021, 10:00 pm

Redman wrote:Good riddance.
She is a bad choice ....and she has a face for radio

Ironic, coming from a LFDRFD PNM die hard, where it's almost as if you have to be a Loch Ness to be a female LFDRFD PNM elected female member.

User avatar
sMASH
TunerGod
Posts: 25628
Joined: January 11th, 2005, 4:30 am

Re: Re: PNM in Gov't

Postby sMASH » January 27th, 2021, 10:12 pm

De Dragon wrote:
Redman wrote:Good riddance.
She is a bad choice ....and she has a face for radio

Ironic, coming from a LFDRFD PNM die hard, where it's almost as if you have to be a Loch Ness to be a female LFDRFD PNM elected female member.

s.dass showing them the possibilities.

User avatar
sMASH
TunerGod
Posts: 25628
Joined: January 11th, 2005, 4:30 am

Re: Re: PNM in Gov't

Postby sMASH » January 27th, 2021, 10:17 pm

srsly speaking, this vote of no confidence had no real benefit for the UNC. the only different result that might have happened, would be if some of the opposition MP's didnt vote for their side.
it was sure to get defeated, it would bolster the grass roots to stick to their side, soften the hard lash pdp give them.

it was a dumb play to do this.

unc will make good decisions if they in govt. but they have to play the politics first, to have a chance to reach. this is the rodney charles spinning wheel dotishness all over again.

User avatar
De Dragon
TriniTuner 24-7
Posts: 17912
Joined: January 27th, 2004, 3:49 am
Location: Enjoying my little miracles............

Re: Re: PNM in Gov't

Postby De Dragon » January 27th, 2021, 10:18 pm

sMASH wrote:srsly speaking, this vote of no confidence had no real benefit for the UNC. the only different result that might have happened, would be if some of the opposition MP's didnt vote for their side.
it was sure to get defeated, it would bolster the grass roots to stick to their side, soften the hard lash pdp give them.

it was a dumb play to do this.

unc will make good decisions if they in govt. but they have to play the politics first, to have a chance to reach. this is the rodney charles spinning wheel dotishness all over again.

All of them are.

User avatar
death365
Shifting into 6th
Posts: 2126
Joined: June 24th, 2013, 2:30 pm
Location: San Juan

Re: Re: PNM in Gov't

Postby death365 » January 28th, 2021, 7:42 am

well technically the airing of the issues in the public domain is always a good thing- brings issues to the forefront.

btw the PM admitted more or less is he in charge of the exemptions!




sMASH wrote:srsly speaking, this vote of no confidence had no real benefit for the UNC. the only different result that might have happened, would be if some of the opposition MP's didnt vote for their side.
it was sure to get defeated, it would bolster the grass roots to stick to their side, soften the hard lash pdp give them.

it was a dumb play to do this.

unc will make good decisions if they in govt. but they have to play the politics first, to have a chance to reach. this is the rodney charles spinning wheel dotishness all over again.

User avatar
De Dragon
TriniTuner 24-7
Posts: 17912
Joined: January 27th, 2004, 3:49 am
Location: Enjoying my little miracles............

Re: Re: PNM in Gov't

Postby De Dragon » January 28th, 2021, 7:48 am

death365 wrote:well technically the airing of the issues in the public domain is always a good thing- brings issues to the forefront.

btw the PM admitted more or less is he in charge of the exemptions!




sMASH wrote:srsly speaking, this vote of no confidence had no real benefit for the UNC. the only different result that might have happened, would be if some of the opposition MP's didnt vote for their side.
it was sure to get defeated, it would bolster the grass roots to stick to their side, soften the hard lash pdp give them.

it was a dumb play to do this.

unc will make good decisions if they in govt. but they have to play the politics first, to have a chance to reach. this is the rodney charles spinning wheel dotishness all over again.

Not really, he said the policy that Goebbels Young is following is on his direction.

User avatar
death365
Shifting into 6th
Posts: 2126
Joined: June 24th, 2013, 2:30 pm
Location: San Juan

Re: Re: PNM in Gov't

Postby death365 » January 28th, 2021, 7:59 am

yeah ... an ministers dont get involved with things that they shouldnt - day to day running of the Ministry. they only set policy :roll:


De Dragon wrote:
death365 wrote:well technically the airing of the issues in the public domain is always a good thing- brings issues to the forefront.

btw the PM admitted more or less is he in charge of the exemptions!




sMASH wrote:srsly speaking, this vote of no confidence had no real benefit for the UNC. the only different result that might have happened, would be if some of the opposition MP's didnt vote for their side.
it was sure to get defeated, it would bolster the grass roots to stick to their side, soften the hard lash pdp give them.

it was a dumb play to do this.

unc will make good decisions if they in govt. but they have to play the politics first, to have a chance to reach. this is the rodney charles spinning wheel dotishness all over again.

Not really, he said the policy that Goebbels Young is following is on his direction.

User avatar
sMASH
TunerGod
Posts: 25628
Joined: January 11th, 2005, 4:30 am

Re: Re: PNM in Gov't

Postby sMASH » January 28th, 2021, 8:08 am

death365 wrote:well technically the airing of the issues in the public domain is always a good thing- brings issues to the forefront.

btw the PM admitted more or less is he in charge of the exemptions!




sMASH wrote:srsly speaking, this vote of no confidence had no real benefit for the UNC. the only different result that might have happened, would be if some of the opposition MP's didnt vote for their side.
it was sure to get defeated, it would bolster the grass roots to stick to their side, soften the hard lash pdp give them.

it was a dumb play to do this.

unc will make good decisions if they in govt. but they have to play the politics first, to have a chance to reach. this is the rodney charles spinning wheel dotishness all over again.


this dont need airing, every body know what is what already.
to explain that, was anyone enlightened by yesterday's effort in futility? all they manage to do was give pnm a small win, instead of letting them soak in the pdp hard slap they get.
this dont need airing, it need solving. and since is a legal matter, it really needs to go to the courts. jess like how she refer the emailgate to the police/dpp off the bat, this needed to get addressed by the courts.

this dumb sheit is what does make redman and habit win by default.

2015 pnm won by 88,000 votes. 2020 they won by 13,000 votes. it have a whole bank of votes waiting to put UNC in govt. but they hadda do sumting to deserve it...... and sheit like this is not it.
between pep, ilp, msj, and the other smaller parties, they combining to make up that 13k difference. pdp in tobago was 10k by them selves, and this recent tha elections showing that it the tides turn away from pnm. tobago west lock pnm but tobago east is about a 1200 difference. now that they have a chance to perform and establish a track record until the next election, they have opportunity to pave way and make up that ground.

unc has votes waiting for them, if they could show a reason they deserve it. its not enough to be the alternative to the pnm.

User avatar
Habit7
TriniTuner 24-7
Posts: 12156
Joined: April 20th, 2009, 10:20 pm

Re: Re: PNM in Gov't

Postby Habit7 » January 28th, 2021, 10:11 am

UNC surely have the potential to take the next general elections. Ppl certainly get fed up of incumbents and 15yrs of PNM could be overkill. Unless the PNM in 2025 can show that there is an upgrade in leadership and innovation from the last PNM of the last decade, it could cause supporters to not show up at the polls.
The majority of the population has rejected KPB for the last decade. She has tremendous support from the UNC faithful but there is a sharp fall-off from the regular ppl. She has stacked the party with her loyalists so even if there is a leadership change, it could still feel like KPB 2.0

2025 could be about who best revolutionise their party.

However, UNC could be reading too much into these local govt election results. UNC supporters need to realise the PNM supporters are not as anxious a voter as they are. PNM has been is power for the majority of time and has strong support in many areas. It allows from complacency and for many voters to not show up on polling day for inconsequential elections. PNM supporters thought that Arima Central and THA was in the bag and many stayed home. But if it were a general election, they will turn out.

A good example: LGE 2019 was 7-7 tie and UNC got the popular vote. UNC was smelling victory and proclaiming that 2020 was a sure thing. It wasn't.
UNC ppl are claiming that 6-6 is Tobago fed up of PNM, even though 5 months ago all Tobago voted PNM. But if Tobago has to go back to the polls, PNM ppl will come out knowing that their tuff is threatened. PDP is near max efficiency right now but if PNM steps it up they could get back their comfortable majority.

Redman
TriniTuner 24-7
Posts: 10430
Joined: August 19th, 2004, 2:48 pm

Re: Re: PNM in Gov't

Postby Redman » January 28th, 2021, 10:36 am

unc will make good decisions if they in govt.

Not if the party remains as it is...

bluefete
TriniTuner 24-7
Posts: 14685
Joined: November 12th, 2008, 10:56 pm
Location: POS

Re: Re: PNM in Gov't

Postby bluefete » January 28th, 2021, 11:40 am

I hearing "money talks" real angling for "Judases".

User avatar
Dohplaydat
3ne2nr Toppa Toppa
Posts: 5150
Joined: December 17th, 2019, 8:31 pm

Re: Re: PNM in Gov't

Postby Dohplaydat » January 28th, 2021, 12:41 pm

sMASH wrote:
death365 wrote:well technically the airing of the issues in the public domain is always a good thing- brings issues to the forefront.

btw the PM admitted more or less is he in charge of the exemptions!




sMASH wrote:srsly speaking, this vote of no confidence had no real benefit for the UNC. the only different result that might have happened, would be if some of the opposition MP's didnt vote for their side.
it was sure to get defeated, it would bolster the grass roots to stick to their side, soften the hard lash pdp give them.

it was a dumb play to do this.

unc will make good decisions if they in govt. but they have to play the politics first, to have a chance to reach. this is the rodney charles spinning wheel dotishness all over again.


this dont need airing, every body know what is what already.
to explain that, was anyone enlightened by yesterday's effort in futility? all they manage to do was give pnm a small win, instead of letting them soak in the pdp hard slap they get.
this dont need airing, it need solving. and since is a legal matter, it really needs to go to the courts. jess like how she refer the emailgate to the police/dpp off the bat, this needed to get addressed by the courts.

this dumb sheit is what does make redman and habit win by default.

2015 pnm won by 88,000 votes. 2020 they won by 13,000 votes. it have a whole bank of votes waiting to put UNC in govt. but they hadda do sumting to deserve it...... and sheit like this is not it.
between pep, ilp, msj, and the other smaller parties, they combining to make up that 13k difference. pdp in tobago was 10k by them selves, and this recent tha elections showing that it the tides turn away from pnm. tobago west lock pnm but tobago east is about a 1200 difference. now that they have a chance to perform and establish a track record until the next election, they have opportunity to pave way and make up that ground.

unc has votes waiting for them, if they could show a reason they deserve it. its not enough to be the alternative to the pnm.


I agree, a credible Vasant led UNC would probably win 29-12.

Gladiator
punchin NOS
Posts: 3937
Joined: April 20th, 2006, 9:43 am

Re: Re: PNM in Gov't

Postby Gladiator » January 28th, 2021, 1:08 pm

Dohplaydat wrote:
sMASH wrote:
death365 wrote:well technically the airing of the issues in the public domain is always a good thing- brings issues to the forefront.

btw the PM admitted more or less is he in charge of the exemptions!




sMASH wrote:srsly speaking, this vote of no confidence had no real benefit for the UNC. the only different result that might have happened, would be if some of the opposition MP's didnt vote for their side.
it was sure to get defeated, it would bolster the grass roots to stick to their side, soften the hard lash pdp give them.

it was a dumb play to do this.

unc will make good decisions if they in govt. but they have to play the politics first, to have a chance to reach. this is the rodney charles spinning wheel dotishness all over again.


this dont need airing, every body know what is what already.
to explain that, was anyone enlightened by yesterday's effort in futility? all they manage to do was give pnm a small win, instead of letting them soak in the pdp hard slap they get.
this dont need airing, it need solving. and since is a legal matter, it really needs to go to the courts. jess like how she refer the emailgate to the police/dpp off the bat, this needed to get addressed by the courts.

this dumb sheit is what does make redman and habit win by default.

2015 pnm won by 88,000 votes. 2020 they won by 13,000 votes. it have a whole bank of votes waiting to put UNC in govt. but they hadda do sumting to deserve it...... and sheit like this is not it.
between pep, ilp, msj, and the other smaller parties, they combining to make up that 13k difference. pdp in tobago was 10k by them selves, and this recent tha elections showing that it the tides turn away from pnm. tobago west lock pnm but tobago east is about a 1200 difference. now that they have a chance to perform and establish a track record until the next election, they have opportunity to pave way and make up that ground.

unc has votes waiting for them, if they could show a reason they deserve it. its not enough to be the alternative to the pnm.


I agree, a credible Vasant led UNC would probably win 29-12.


So the race issue would just miraculously vanish....

User avatar
sMASH
TunerGod
Posts: 25628
Joined: January 11th, 2005, 4:30 am

Re: Re: PNM in Gov't

Postby sMASH » January 28th, 2021, 1:15 pm

vasant is a bobolie, a puppet without a hand. pnm will spin he all how in parliament, like a midget vene in rich gold.

he and dooks and kirk, all them fellas good, at what they do. they coudl write good law, get projects off the ground, but cant fight in politics. pnm will outplay them.


look at what happened yesterday at the end of the debate. it was preemptively stopped when the call for the vote was made, speaker went along, kamala didnt get time to complete the proceedings properly. not even the govt ministers realized they had to vote on the motion at the time. boom they vote, session done.

no opposition there was able to push back the pnm, even though they had the rules on their side. govt operated outside the rules, and didnt get push back to go back into the crease.

u dont only need to be right, u also need to be able to push it forward onto the pnm. vasant dem good at teh secretary positions, parliament need CEO competence.

User avatar
Dohplaydat
3ne2nr Toppa Toppa
Posts: 5150
Joined: December 17th, 2019, 8:31 pm

Re: Re: PNM in Gov't

Postby Dohplaydat » January 28th, 2021, 1:43 pm

sMASH wrote:vasant is a bobolie, a puppet without a hand. pnm will spin he all how in parliament, like a midget vene in rich gold.

he and dooks and kirk, all them fellas good, at what they do. they coudl write good law, get projects off the ground, but cant fight in politics. pnm will outplay them.


look at what happened yesterday at the end of the debate. it was preemptively stopped when the call for the vote was made, speaker went along, kamala didnt get time to complete the proceedings properly. not even the govt ministers realized they had to vote on the motion at the time. boom they vote, session done.

no opposition there was able to push back the pnm, even though they had the rules on their side. govt operated outside the rules, and didnt get push back to go back into the crease.

u dont only need to be right, u also need to be able to push it forward onto the pnm. vasant dem good at teh secretary positions, parliament need CEO competence.


Doh lump Vasant in with Dooks, Vasant is a master at politics, he was the main strategic advisor for Bas. Problem is because he was Bas's boy, he got sidelined in PP, Kamla and the cabal made sure he never had any real influence in the party.

I admire the f*ck out of Vasant because he unlike many before has not given up.

User avatar
sMASH
TunerGod
Posts: 25628
Joined: January 11th, 2005, 4:30 am

Re: Re: PNM in Gov't

Postby sMASH » January 28th, 2021, 1:55 pm

last internal election, against a disheveled kamala, he coudlnt do jack sheit. and when he would have worked for bas, they were up against patos. alwaris, imburt and rowley are completely different animals.
unc is fighting yesterday's war.

User avatar
Dohplaydat
3ne2nr Toppa Toppa
Posts: 5150
Joined: December 17th, 2019, 8:31 pm

Re: Re: PNM in Gov't

Postby Dohplaydat » January 28th, 2021, 3:20 pm

sMASH wrote:last internal election, against a disheveled kamala, he coudlnt do jack sheit. and when he would have worked for bas, they were up against patos. alwaris, imburt and rowley are completely different animals.
unc is fighting yesterday's war.


Well look maybe, but he is infinitely smarter and better suited for PM than any of our current political leaders.

Advertisement

Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Duane 3NE 2NR, Google [Bot], pugboy and 46 guests