Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
zoom rader wrote:
If you and other tuners took the time to read what they said in Layman's terms to understand, it basically says its not about the outcome but about the laws that was broken as it say here again
Trinispougla wrote:Firstly, I don't vote, I think the democratic process is a complete waste of time, giving voices to people who should not. Secondly, as I said, the fact that these two judges came with a totally different judgement is beyond me. The reasons for those judgements were even more absurd. Don't get me wrong, fairness would let the petitioners say their case. Mendonca's assertion that the result was materially affected, despite the overwhelming NUMERICAL evidence is stupifying. Jamadar virtually said the process was more important than the actual result, is also churlish, pretzel logic. While the process guarantees fairness, the investment is in the result of the election. Nobody wins an election and contests any administrative matter, certainly not in the third world. So as I said, to find out what powers the ebc has yes, that is a matter of utmost importance, but to annull the election no
zoom rader wrote:Trinispougla wrote:Actually I did read Justices Mendonca and Jamar's reports. I also know that even if elections rules are broken, there is only one provision for annulment in the whole Representation of the People Act and that is in section 35(3) and I am saying that to say that its not only numbers is wrong. An election is a numerical analysis of how popular you are with the voters. That provision is only provided when one shows that the RESULT of the election is compromised and shifted in the direction of one of the participants. I agree(I said this before) that the EBC's powers need to be seriously examined and definitively outlined as I do think they stepped out of line. But to say the shifted the result in favor of one party is wrong. That the UNC found out late is an administrative issue and anybody who went to or work in EBC realize it seriously disorganized and every election, the collect flack.
A numbers game Yes, as I said and have being saying all along it does not matter who wins or who wants to retain power. Its the legality of the EBC, manner and method they applied. Most here don't understand that.
EBC should have nothing to worry about since they believe they acted upon powers given to them to make that decision. Its now for the legal minds to determine that fate.
bluesclues wrote:zoom rader wrote:desifemlove wrote:zoom rader wrote:Trinispougla wrote:I really dont see this having any success. The pp lost by some heavy margins in four of the six constituencies. OVER 3500 IN TUNAPUNA, over 4 thousand in toco sangre-grande, over 3500 in tunapuna, over 4 thousand in sando west. But this is a strange land and stranger things have happened
It's not a matter of success.
It's to make sure that the EBC and the PNM Can't do as they please where the rule of law is concerned.
but ent Kams's plan to get back in office and discredit PNM to say "dey got ting by fraud!"? if they rule to clarify how EBC annonuce ting, then this plan won't work.
This is not a plan
It's about maintaining the rule of law.
This must never happen again. EBC and PNM Can not do as they please
in summary nothing gonna come of it really. unc knows they cant win anything again. kamla just sounds delusional. like she ent wake up from the shock that she got the boot yet. still home in she bed sleeping and dreaming she is still the pm.
basically is a grand charge to make the ebc check itself and establish what it can and cannot do regarding time extension. a strategic block on 'next time'. but what does it matter. they really think anyone gonna vote for unc in the future? afaic kamla killed the party and the cabal sucked it dry. now our options are to still vote for one of the cabal members because obviously is the big boys in the party that will even be able to contest that position. a bunch of clones to provide the illusion that u getting something clean cut. when in reality is just perfume they trying to spray on a fat load.
i feel unc dead inno. i just feel so. all the members, every last one have to exit and be replaced for unc to get another shot.... in about 20 years.
EmilioA wrote:zoom rader wrote:
If you and other tuners took the time to read what they said in Layman's terms to understand, it basically says its not about the outcome but about the laws that was broken as it say here again
To be accurate.. They said it is about the laws that MAY have been broken.
Both Jamadar and Mendonca admitted that the UNC did not put forward any good evidence but decided the issue was to important to dismiss since the public needed to be confident in the elections.
Such a position elevates outcome as absolutely determinative of legitimacy and discards process as of no or little consequence. Therein lies a path to undemocratic rule,” [b]Jamadar said as he suggested that the purpose of the petitions was to ensure public confidence in the electorial process
desifemlove wrote:So essentially all the court can or cannot rule is recommendations on how the EBC is changed, ent?
and if Rowley choose to disregard these recommendations, which is within his rights, when then? bacchanal and money, and some time in the Sun to get a tan for the QC?
desifemlove wrote:in our system, courts cannot make governments change or make new laws. the only way is to challenge the Act of Parliament, and even then PNM has the majority.
and Privy Council, yuh past two leaders/PMs wanted CCJ...yuh forget?
desifemlove wrote:in our system, courts cannot make governments change or make new laws. the only way is to challenge the Act of Parliament, and even then PNM has the majority.
and Privy Council, yuh past two leaders/PMs wanted CCJ...yuh forget?
desifemlove wrote:Zoom is saying the issue ent about getting back government through the back door, and UNC only want to NOW clarify the EBC's role and not win back those seats. So if so, when did this change? is the position still to get the seats annulled and recontested?
Sanctifier wrote:^ ^ ^ Nope! Its more a case of PNM got through the FRONT door with the massive help of the POPULAR VOTE!... and by winning the MOST SEATS in the Election... DEAL WITH IT!
The portfolio for all future "back door" issues has already been given to the UNC MP hand-picked by the ex-PM.
At least that seems to be all he wants to talk about... once the TV cameras are around.
Sanctifier wrote:^ ^ ^ Nope! Its more a case of PNM got through the FRONT door with the massive help of the POPULAR VOTE!... and by winning the MOST SEATS in the Election... DEAL WITH IT!
zoom rader wrote:After the gates was re-opened after 6pm under dubious means . I wonder why the same was not allowed for Tobago.
shogun wrote:Sanctifier wrote:^ ^ ^ Nope! Its more a case of PNM got through the FRONT door with the massive help of the POPULAR VOTE!... and by winning the MOST SEATS in the Election... DEAL WITH IT!
You studying ZR? He/they have nothing else to stand on, so they'll forever harp orn the ONE scrap they were handed. They lucky the polls weren't open for two extra hours instead, or the even more notable margin of the PNM win would have caused mass heart attacks among the Kamla loyalists.
We have a pending illegal government... Please ZR, NEVER shake your head too much... The noise might KILL you.Sanctifier wrote:TRANSLATION: Yuh could go tuh de Courthouse now boi, okay?
Trinispougla wrote:I hope ZR realizes that the UNC has never won an election by themselves. They always have to partner with somebody else.
1986- ulf with the nar
1995- UNC needed to MP's to cross to win
2010- the reason there was such a landslide was because it was hoped the COP would have policed the UNC. That did not happen and we had the 2015 result.
Right now even if some insane judge grant their wish,because that's the only way they can get somebody to ignore the huge numbers involved, they will have to partner with someone else to get the east-west corridor, highly unlikely now. Is not Guyana where ethnic numbers decide the election
Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 378 guests