Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
EFFECTIC DESIGNS wrote:Aaah boy this mc Kamla eh, we give this woman a2/3 majority to repeal and replace this facking thing to something that is more fair she had a 2/3 majority she could ah even reform local government one time so this would ah end up being a good thing.
But all she do was drink rum and it have people who will still defend this woman to this day. And this next jackass woman who own a shop up by me telling me yesterday how is not Kamla fault because EBC stole the election with the 1 hour and if they hadn't stolen the election she would ah be in power to do it.
People have the nerve to be this dotish.
EFFECTIC DESIGNS wrote:^ Kamla does drink rum and people who believe the EBC stole the election are dotish, Kamla had 5 years and a 2/3 majority and instead of repealing this thing she drink rum. And unless UNC is reformed and Kamla and the Cabal goes we will have 20 years PNM rule in we rectum.
Suck it up, facts are facts.
EFFECTIC DESIGNS wrote:I don't think I am a "die hard PNM" far from it considering I didn't even vote PNM in 2015 and I even supported UNC in 2015 though I didn't vote for any of them.
Both parties do good and bad, but you seem to miss my point which is we elected Kamla in 2010 because of the same property tax issue and she promised to repeal it and she never did, she drink rum and we know this because she was drunk all the time. And if she remains as opposition leader the UNC will not see office again, I want her and the cabal gone from the UNC for the greater good.
This is the big difference, Rowley was still honest enough to tell everybody he was bringing back property Tax if he won the election and so said so done. The only promise Rowley didn't hold was local government reform which is my major issue with this tax because I am of the firm belief that they want this money to run racket, I have no proof of this but this is what always happens in this country and I cannot think of any logical reasoning for not implementing local government reform.
88sins wrote:sMASH wrote:talking bout talking...
property tax protest this saturday,
11 am, at Pierre road recreation grounds.
If they had any kinda basic intelligence, they'd keep it on a Sunday, in PoS at the QPS, & the entire procession would march to the PM's residence.
That protest as is only serves to show the UNC how many chupidees would potentially vote for them in the next GE
EFFECTIC DESIGNS wrote:88sins wrote:sMASH wrote:talking bout talking...
property tax protest this saturday,
11 am, at Pierre road recreation grounds.
If they had any kinda basic intelligence, they'd keep it on a Sunday, in PoS at the QPS, & the entire procession would march to the PM's residence.
That protest as is only serves to show the UNC how many chupidees would potentially vote for them in the next GE
^^ THIS!!
sMASH wrote:Wait, tax everybody, to buy gym equipment?
That making sense?
88sins wrote:Those types of scenarios are common, but most ppl really don't consider how dangerous cattle/goats running free in the road can be.
88sins wrote:RedVEVO wrote:
Many people live from pay check, to pay check with little or no savings.
Many people are in denial.
Basically they give up and live one day at a time.
They have the power to protest . But they do not .
So the Gov't takes advantage hence tax and tax and tax .
THIS is the problem. & this is why I say, the vast majority of Trinis are gutless sheep. This cowardice was programmed into them, & these halfwit politicians know this all too well. The have no fear of 2/3 the population marching into PoS to kick their backsides out when they do crap, because they know Trinis go say "well wha we go do, is d gorvament say so, so it hadda be so"
If a march is organized, is bottle & spoon & tassa & rum & roti, is never a real protest with Trini's, is ALWAYS a party.
rspann wrote:In reality, the tax is for amenties related to the property such as garbage collection , sidewalks, better roads etc ,so that the person living in the property should be responsible for paying the tax seeing that they are the ones who are enjoying the services.
I own a lot of rental properties a,but i have decided not to pass on the tax to my tenants. They are the ones who can least afford additional burdens right now. Landlords want to make the same amount they are making now, so I hear a lot of them saying they are going to raise the rent by a hundred or two per month. When you calculate it they will be making profit on it too.
If you have an eight apt. building at $3000 to $3500 each ,you pull in $24000 to $28000 per month, If you take out for repairs (which are mostly minor if you built properly) Insurance and routine maintenance, you still have over $250000 left. Whats the big deal in paying the tax?
christopherwilliams2 wrote:Squatters to pay that 20 dollars tax now....hmmm ...occupy land-pay tax-land is mine!
rspann wrote:In reality, the tax is for amenties related to the property such as garbage collection , sidewalks, better roads etc ,so that the person living in the property should be responsible for paying the tax seeing that they are the ones who are enjoying the services.
I own a lot of rental properties a,but i have decided not to pass on the tax to my tenants. They are the ones who can least afford additional burdens right now. Landlords want to make the same amount they are making now, so I hear a lot of them saying they are going to raise the rent by a hundred or two per month. When you calculate it they will be making profit on it too.
If you have an eight apt. building at $3000 to $3500 each ,you pull in $24000 to $28000 per month, If you take out for repairs (which are mostly minor if you built properly) Insurance and routine maintenance, you still have over $250000 left. Whats the big deal in paying the tax?
Redman wrote:Matrix you have a link to the law you quoting?
RedVEVO wrote:On the other side however , Roget protest the other day and Gov't give up within hours !
rspann wrote:In reality, the tax is for amenties related to the property such as garbage collection , sidewalks, better roads etc ,so that the person living in the property should be responsible for paying the tax seeing that they are the ones who are enjoying the services.
I own a lot of rental properties a,but i have decided not to pass on the tax to my tenants. They are the ones who can least afford additional burdens right now. Landlords want to make the same amount they are making now, so I hear a lot of them saying they are going to raise the rent by a hundred or two per month. When you calculate it they will be making profit on it too.
If you have an eight apt. building at $3000 to $3500 each ,you pull in $24000 to $28000 per month, If you take out for repairs (which are mostly minor if you built properly) Insurance and routine maintenance, you still have over $250000 left. Whats the big deal in paying the tax?
Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], tool-band and 56 guests