Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
Razkal wrote:question:
how come 'we' giving so much credit to a short-cut version of the actual sport?
to me this is akin to glorified small goal football
VexXx Dogg wrote:Razkal wrote:question:
how come 'we' giving so much credit to a short-cut version of the actual sport?
to me this is akin to glorified small goal football
Raz, times have changed.
Test cricket is almost dead.
ODI's have lost appeal.
this short form of the game has become highly commercialized and successful and pulls more sponsors and spectators.
Razkal wrote:VexXx Dogg wrote:Razkal wrote:question:
how come 'we' giving so much credit to a short-cut version of the actual sport?
to me this is akin to glorified small goal football
Raz, times have changed.
Test cricket is almost dead.
ODI's have lost appeal.
this short form of the game has become highly commercialized and successful and pulls more sponsors and spectators.
sigh....its all about the benjamins now isn't it?
Since it's the same ground that will be used for the final, perhaps the thinking is that the reduction in time is an acceptable trade off in exchange for "home" advantage. Time will tell I suppose
Razkal wrote:VexXx Dogg wrote:Razkal wrote:question:
how come 'we' giving so much credit to a short-cut version of the actual sport?
to me this is akin to glorified small goal football
Raz, times have changed.
Test cricket is almost dead.
ODI's have lost appeal.
this short form of the game has become highly commercialized and successful and pulls more sponsors and spectators.
sigh....its all about the benjamins now isn't it?
Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 58 guests