Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
bluesclues wrote:EFFECTIC DESIGNS wrote:Daran wrote:If these by elections are held in 9 months expect pnm to lose most.
doubt it. The best thing honestly is for Kamla and the Cabal to take a rest and just let the PNM run the country so we can see if they really will deliver or if they were on sheit, only time will tell. UNC had their opportunity and they screwed up big time.
But besides that Daran ask yourself this, do you seriously want to see or hear from Moonilal and Rambachan again? I don't think anyone wants to except maybe 50 people who profited big time.
theres very little room for doubt. with the instant upsurge in crime. if pnm dont get a handle on it they could get evacuated quite quickly. but i believe ppl will vote ilp. not unc.
bluesclues wrote:still they could send members to contest the seats and force a coalition with the pnm. so that is not a pure pnm government running the country. this would be good in my view. ALL PARTIES need oversight during their rule.
pugboy wrote:they probably hoping that the budget will have cuts which will sway voters
Trinispougla wrote:Realistically, this move is probably going to set back Trinidad's race relations a further 25 years. The election has already done that, so we're probably at the point of the dawn of independence. Only thing is,we have low oil prices, serious social tensions and I think at this point an incident is inevitable. Trinidad has some serious questions to ask herself in the coming months and years. Whether we want to end up like Guyana and Fiji or we want to continue as the example of integration that has taken fifty plus years to create.
bluesclues wrote:still they could send members to contest the seats and force a coalition with the pnm. so that is not a pure pnm government running the country. this would be good in my view. pnm needs oversight during their rule.
EmilioA wrote:bluesclues wrote:still they could send members to contest the seats and force a coalition with the pnm. so that is not a pure pnm government running the country. this would be good in my view. pnm needs oversight during their rule.
Why PNM need to coalition with a party that cant win any seats ?
bluesclues wrote:EmilioA wrote:bluesclues wrote:still they could send members to contest the seats and force a coalition with the pnm. so that is not a pure pnm government running the country. this would be good in my view. pnm needs oversight during their rule.
Why PNM need to coalition with a party that cant win any seats ?
not thinking party. but if the candidate is suitable why does it matter what party they from?
RASC wrote:Y'all living in the muthafreaking clouds. I swear.
Blues do you even do a study of the political landscape and the parties?
Think for a second what it is you're suggesting.
bluesclues wrote:RASC wrote:Y'all living in the muthafreaking clouds. I swear.
Blues do you even do a study of the political landscape and the parties?
Think for a second what it is you're suggesting.
its not happened in a long time. but the tide has to turn some time right? which is what people did this election. they expressed their disappointment with the performance of the unc government after they placed so much hope in them by voting them out. keith rowley is on probation.
sMASH wrote:Wrt blues:
What u talking about is changing the way the government is set up So that u don't need a party , and where one side rules over the other side.
The political divide feeds the racial divide inorder to survive, because the racial divide fuels the party with voting base.
When we vote is for a party which is camouflage for racial tribe.
When u can remove one side forming the government and the other side being the opposition, which is like one side winning and the other side losing, then u can be free to vote for a representative.
As long as the person who u chose to represent u wins their position, they should be part of the government.
What ever benefits or advantages by privileges or position, ministers get by being part of the party which forms the government, remove it. All representatives should have equal say, status, power, opportunity, authority, responsibility, and accountability.
We should vote for a PM separately from an MP. if u going up for PM u can't for up for MP,and vice versa.
Wwsnt should not have to vote in a new government, we should vote for a representative who would seek our interests when in government.
bluesclues wrote:
no im talking about ppl vote based on candidate completely ignoring party. but judging candidate based on their track record and their speeches. splitting the vote enough to force dual and tri-party coalition governments. where no one party holds all the power of either ruling government or opposition. that way theyll all keep eachother on their toes trying to knock eachother out. squealing every time some hint of corruption take place.
.
EmilioA wrote:bluesclues wrote:
no im talking about ppl vote based on candidate completely ignoring party. but judging candidate based on their track record and their speeches. splitting the vote enough to force dual and tri-party coalition governments. where no one party holds all the power of either ruling government or opposition. that way theyll all keep eachother on their toes trying to knock eachother out. squealing every time some hint of corruption take place.
.
Exactly in which country is that the norm ?
bluesclues wrote:EmilioA wrote:bluesclues wrote:
no im talking about ppl vote based on candidate completely ignoring party. but judging candidate based on their track record and their speeches. splitting the vote enough to force dual and tri-party coalition governments. where no one party holds all the power of either ruling government or opposition. that way theyll all keep eachother on their toes trying to knock eachother out. squealing every time some hint of corruption take place.
.
Exactly in which country is that the norm ?
this question has no relevance. this is not something ive seen another country do. im just saying, it would be a wise move imo if the populace could figure it out.
it is precisely this kamla wanted to prevent with the new voting system. that voting system was specifically designed to destroy any chance of a coalition government forming by having 'knockout rounds'. and the COP support it like some pusses not realizing it was a move designed to get rid of them as co-pilot so that the unc cabal could make full mass in government. but kamla head was so high in the clouds she didnt consider that she might lose the election. lol
bluesclues wrote:EFFECTIC DESIGNS wrote:Daran wrote:If these by elections are held in 9 months expect pnm to lose most.
doubt it. The best thing honestly is for Kamla and the Cabal to take a rest and just let the PNM run the country so we can see if they really will deliver or if they were on sheit, only time will tell. UNC had their opportunity and they screwed up big time.
But besides that Daran ask yourself this, do you seriously want to see or hear from Moonilal and Rambachan again? I don't think anyone wants to except maybe 50 people who profited big time.
theres very little room for doubt. with the instant upsurge in crime. if pnm dont get a handle on it they could get evacuated quite quickly. but i believe ppl will vote ilp. not unc.
The_Honourable wrote:pugboy wrote:they probably hoping that the budget will have cuts which will sway voters
EXACTLY! People will forget about prisongate, emailgate, section 34 etc once you interfere with their pockets. If the cuts are austerity-like within the next 2-3 years, and UNC have their way in the courts, Kamla have a big chance of coming back.
Dr. Rowley better hope that the world economic system don't suffer another crash. Many are sure a crash is coming but the question is when.
Redman wrote:bluesclues wrote:EmilioA wrote:bluesclues wrote:
no im talking about ppl vote based on candidate completely ignoring party. but judging candidate based on their track record and their speeches. splitting the vote enough to force dual and tri-party coalition governments. where no one party holds all the power of either ruling government or opposition. that way theyll all keep eachother on their toes trying to knock eachother out. squealing every time some hint of corruption take place.
.
Exactly in which country is that the norm ?
this question has no relevance. this is not something ive seen another country do. im just saying, it would be a wise move imo if the populace could figure it out.
it is precisely this kamla wanted to prevent with the new voting system. that voting system was specifically designed to destroy any chance of a coalition government forming by having 'knockout rounds'. and the COP support it like some pusses not realizing it was a move designed to get rid of them as co-pilot so that the unc cabal could make full mass in government. but kamla head was so high in the clouds she didnt consider that she might lose the election. lol
What that would lead to is a totally fractured parliament that would be unable to arrive at consensus...and therefore pass no law.
UML wrote:The PNM stated on their political platform they will solve crime, end corruption (first country in the world) and US$ will be flowing in the roads like milk and honey.
Still waiting 50 years now
fallen_angel wrote:how can I get in contact with sarah lisa boodoo?
I want to put my stamp on her ballot
Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”
Users browsing this forum: st7 and 78 guests