Postby bluesclues » November 9th, 2016, 11:26 am
The clinton bush empire is a military industrial complex entangled group who generate revenue for america and keep its economy afloat by fueling wars and supplying arms and personnel for wars around the world. This is also how they make their money and for their eu connected investor corporations who sit on standby to provide financial aid when needed. From artificially inflating or crashing stocks to false flag events, they do whatever they deem necessary with no moral restraint. Their elitist outlook would sacrifice the world and engage in shady relations as long as it benefits them and where by extension the american economy and people. This is y they went to war in iraq. For gold and artifacts. And brought the judgement of not only the american ppl but the world upon them only after they felt the backlash. This woke americans up to the fact that they can face consequences for their choices regardless of how powerful their army is. And fueled a desire from americans to adjust their foreign policy...
Que obama
Obama was then elected as u remember i called his first term on the basis of his potential to forge better relationships with middleeast countries. It was what america needed desperately at the time and he was the strongest candidate in the lineup to pull it off. He got to work on that and provided a sympathetic presidency towards not just muslims but islamists. Over time he came to understand the middleeastern culture better during his tenure, and realized not only did america make a serious mistake interfereing in middleeastern affairs in iraq and iran, but he could no longer pull america out of the feud as their participation was now being requested by other middleeastern countries to assist in cleaning up the mess they created. Placing him between a rock and a hard place. His wisdom on foreign policy surely increased during his tenure and in his second term and perhaps he may have deserved a 3rd. But i sense that he was relieved it was his last term as his hands were also tied by the backroom assistants that aided him in getting to power in the first place.
This is why many people are worried about a trump presidency. Since america's sustainability notably comes from investing in conflict and supplying arms and training to both sides. If trump were to pursue the moral high ground and peaceful relations and a cleaner less militarized presidency and foreign policy, then america will lose significant revenues in the longrun. But its what the people want rather than have their cities bombed at random in backlash from 'extremists' who as obama knows by now, just want to give them back a taste of their own medicine.
The next point is that a good businessman does not necessarily make a good DEMOCRATIC leader/president and this has been proven time and time again. Trump has stated that he will rebuild america and create infrastructure jobs. But one must wonder where he will get the money to do such a thing and it is reminiscent of manning's wasteful spending era. Especially in light of the drastic cut in revenues america would face from a more peaceable foreign policy as he is promising.
Nevertheless, america has to make the sacrifice at this point to improve relations with their neighbours and it will hit them hard in the pcket to accomplish this. Taking care of veterans will also be expensive which is why they have been left in the dirt to survive as vagrants on american streets by previous administrations. And it may be even more difficult now that the military may play a much less active role in sustaining america.
As someone aware of the conditions being faced i have to ask the question... where is he going to get the money from. Sure, he's rich... wealthy even. But not wealthy enough to fund all his idealistic goals out of pocket as some people may assume. But again, nonetheless this is the path america now has to take and it seems all indicators point to america facing some sort of economic decline to accomplish it. So yes. America may face hard times under trump, mainly because of the moral direction it is forced to take to avoid backlash from countries over the water, where previously they assumed they can do anything in foreign countries because they consist of people too poor to be able to construct an attack that reaches american soil. Once they learned they were wrong about that, moral implications became the talking point and adjustments needed to be made.
We await to see how trump applies his business sense to gdp growth in the abscence of export revenues from foreign conflict. But we expect some significant measure of decline along the path to internal recovery. For which donald may get blamed although he was not the cause. He must be careful his spending agenda. But the american ppl are counting on his business sense to reroute american policies to provide internal growth. As usual, one can say all the right things on the podium, but the reality of how it will be accomplished is not thoroughly addressed. He will have to learn the differences between balancing a business and balancing an economy. As much as declaring bankruptsy can be a business strategy, in a national economy such a move does not come without great turmoil. It will mainly depend on his learning curve to become formidable in his knowledge as president to do nothing less than... diversify america's economy.
Signed
Magus Illuminatus
Last edited by
bluesclues on November 9th, 2016, 11:26 am, edited 3 times in total.
lol
