Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
drchaos wrote:People keep comparing Venezuela to Trinidad ... Why? Highly unlikely we will end up there, its just fear mongering.
They had a "socialist" revolution with a bunch of dumb/proven to fail policies like nationalizing the whole petroleum industry and shifting food distribution to a socialist system .... In Trinidad capitalism is still the name of the game.
drchaos wrote:People keep comparing Venezuela to Trinidad ... Why? Highly unlikely we will end up there, its just fear mongering.
They had a "socialist" revolution with a bunch of dumb/proven to fail policies like nationalizing the whole petroleum industry and shifting food distribution to a socialist system .... In Trinidad capitalism is still the name of the game.
Dizzy28 wrote:drchaos wrote:People keep comparing Venezuela to Trinidad ... Why? Highly unlikely we will end up there, its just fear mongering.
They had a "socialist" revolution with a bunch of dumb/proven to fail policies like nationalizing the whole petroleum industry and shifting food distribution to a socialist system .... In Trinidad capitalism is still the name of the game.
We have a socialist welfare system..
Subsidized gasoline/diesel was just one element
There is free health care
Free Tertiary education
Book Grants/Uniform grants etc
School Feeding
Housing Repair grants (Self Help Commission)
Subsidized Housing (HDC)
Subsidized Land (LSA)
Generous social development schemes - Food Card, poor relief grant, disability grant, appliance grant (I kid you not there is a grant for poor people to buy fridges and stoves)
Subsidized electricity
Numerous make work programmes - color me orange, cepep, urp
All this while being one of the few countries in the world with a flat tax personal income tax system and no land and building taxes for a period approaching 6 years now.
With a collapse of our main forex earner (80%) and GDP driver (42%) we very well could end up like Venezuela
eliteauto wrote:I wonder how comfortable the Society of Surgeons were inviting someone to make a political speech
Habit7 wrote:Pirate wrote:Miktay wrote:the devil reach...MINISTER of Finance Colm Imbert yesterday announced he has agreed to engage officials of the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and the World Bank to provide advice on Trinidad and Tobago’s fiscal policy. The officials will provide technical assistance on a number of areas including: the regime governing oil and gas production; revenue maximisation; reform of the Heritage and Stabilisation Fund; foreign exchange and Government spending, including expenditure in the areas of national security and education.
http://www.newsday.co.tt/news/0,226825.html
So all the 'advice' and 'public consultations' the civil engineering fiance minister had probably didn't work out so he is looking for assistance from Fareign!
This step probably would not have been necessary if he was qualified for such an important position.
Bad on one side, worse on the other...
Well the IMF, one of the ppl he is consulting, commended him so far with regard to his economic policies. http://www.imf.org/external/np/sec/pr/2016/pr16115.htm
The man has to ask for international help moving forward, not like if he can rely on the Opposition.
De Dragon wrote:eliteauto wrote:I wonder how comfortable the Society of Surgeons were inviting someone to make a political speech
Prolly the same comfort level as the Rotary Club of POS when they invited Terrence Farrell..........
eliteauto wrote:De Dragon wrote:eliteauto wrote:I wonder how comfortable the Society of Surgeons were inviting someone to make a political speech
Prolly the same comfort level as the Rotary Club of POS when they invited Terrence Farrell..........
considering the context of both speeches that makes no sense
De Dragon wrote:eliteauto wrote:De Dragon wrote:eliteauto wrote:I wonder how comfortable the Society of Surgeons were inviting someone to make a political speech
Prolly the same comfort level as the Rotary Club of POS when they invited Terrence Farrell..........
considering the context of both speeches that makes no sense
Context? Farrell bashed the last admin during his speech with a very pronounced political slant. How is that different? Jwala came across as bitter and vindictive, but I really wish that you all would.at least attempt to appear as though you all fairly call out your own when they digress from their appointed function and openly campaign or lick their employers' arses
pete wrote:Massy would be paying duty on car parts though. What makes you think they are not?
eliteauto wrote:visited some new car dealers today and I can say the new taxes seem to have hit them a bit, almost all the sales persons were steering us to smaller engine vehicles automatically and the price changes were quite a bit. One rep told us that a particular suv is now considered "dead stock" and they were absorbing the increase to a point just to get the last 6 sold. I notice some banks are extending repayment terms to keep the instalments similar to the old rates as well.
eliteauto wrote:De Dragon wrote:eliteauto wrote:De Dragon wrote:eliteauto wrote:I wonder how comfortable the Society of Surgeons were inviting someone to make a political speech
Prolly the same comfort level as the Rotary Club of POS when they invited Terrence Farrell..........
considering the context of both speeches that makes no sense
Context? Farrell bashed the last admin during his speech with a very pronounced political slant. How is that different? Jwala came across as bitter and vindictive, but I really wish that you all would.at least attempt to appear as though you all fairly call out your own when they digress from their appointed function and openly campaign or lick their employers' arses
you're confusing context with content, again you're not making sense. Dunno what's "your own" either, clearly you have some issue let's leave it be
scotty_buttons wrote:eliteauto wrote:visited some new car dealers today and I can say the new taxes seem to have hit them a bit, almost all the sales persons were steering us to smaller engine vehicles automatically and the price changes were quite a bit. One rep told us that a particular suv is now considered "dead stock" and they were absorbing the increase to a point just to get the last 6 sold. I notice some banks are extending repayment terms to keep the instalments similar to the old rates as well.
Which firm is that may I ask? Almost all mid sized SUVs like the RAV4 and Tucson and sportage should not be affected by the price.
If it's a 2.0 engine SUV that firm on sh!t.
eliteauto wrote:scotty_buttons wrote:eliteauto wrote:visited some new car dealers today and I can say the new taxes seem to have hit them a bit, almost all the sales persons were steering us to smaller engine vehicles automatically and the price changes were quite a bit. One rep told us that a particular suv is now considered "dead stock" and they were absorbing the increase to a point just to get the last 6 sold. I notice some banks are extending repayment terms to keep the instalments similar to the old rates as well.
Which firm is that may I ask? Almost all mid sized SUVs like the RAV4 and Tucson and sportage should not be affected by the price.
If it's a 2.0 engine SUV that firm on sh!t.
was the Chevy Captiva, which is 2.2 and 2.4
drchaos wrote:Yeah thinking the same thing ... that car was dead stock before. LOL
I mean who buys a captiva?
DVSTT wrote:How will the population react if GATE is removed?
Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 49 guests