Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
fatboy slim wrote:they might allow transgenders and obese women to enter as well. god help us.
Monk BANzai wrote:meanwhile....
crazybalhead wrote:Monk BANzai wrote:meanwhile....
String beans?
Gem_in_i wrote:But the international competition they would eventually go to will still have the swimsuit segment?
redmanjp wrote:Gem_in_i wrote:But the international competition they would eventually go to will still have the swimsuit segment?
This is what I wondering, unless they follow suit then goodbye murica, time to start recording and archiving these competitions. No more eye candy
RedVEVO wrote:redmanjp wrote:Gem_in_i wrote:But the international competition they would eventually go to will still have the swimsuit segment?
This is what I wondering, unless they follow suit then goodbye murica, time to start recording and archiving these competitions. No more eye candy
Miss America IS eye candy .
Take the candy away and you have ?
Who will stand in a bikini now and say I want World Peace and end to World Hunger ?
Can Donny Trump do that ?
Doh forget gazesha toorspann wrote:So Shanaynay and Loqueesha could be Miss America now?
rspann wrote:So Shanaynay and Loqueesha could be Miss America now?
I'm a masculinist and I approve this message. For too long have we been left out of pageant competitions and judged only on the size of our bank accounts, the value of our assets and occasionally the wit of our personality. I demand that we be allowed to opportunity to be itemised as well and now is the ideal time to do it now that there is no danger of having a "speedo" competition (yuck!)hydroep wrote:Nice man, nice...very "progressive" of them. But ah find they coulda go de whole hog and allow transgenders in the competition as well.
That it's a women's only pageant is a tad bit sexist...isn't it?[/sarcasm]...
Slartibartfast wrote:I'm a masculinist and I approve this message. For too long have we been left out of pageant competitions and judged only on the size of our bank accounts, the value of our assets and occasionally the wit of our personality. I demand that we be allowed to opportunity to be itemised as well and now is the ideal time to do it now that there is no danger of having a "speedo" competition (yuck!)hydroep wrote:Nice man, nice...very "progressive" of them. But ah find they coulda go de whole hog and allow transgenders in the competition as well.
That it's a women's only pageant is a tad bit sexist...isn't it?[/sarcasm]...
In other news, Miss America experiences a sharp decline in ratings next year as they realise that many viewers did not watch earlier pageants for the riveting commentary or the girls' interesting personality.
BTW, ppl still watch this? I though people stop watching Miss Universe since they introduced cable. I actually predict an initial increase in viewership and feminists sign on to show solidarity followed by a sharp decline as they move on to their next vicitm.
BrilliantRedVEVO wrote:Slartibartfast wrote:I'm a masculinist and I approve this message. For too long have we been left out of pageant competitions and judged only on the size of our bank accounts, the value of our assets and occasionally the wit of our personality. I demand that we be allowed to opportunity to be itemised as well and now is the ideal time to do it now that there is no danger of having a "speedo" competition (yuck!)hydroep wrote:Nice man, nice...very "progressive" of them. But ah find they coulda go de whole hog and allow transgenders in the competition as well.
That it's a women's only pageant is a tad bit sexist...isn't it?[/sarcasm]...
In other news, Miss America experiences a sharp decline in ratings next year as they realise that many viewers did not watch earlier pageants for the riveting commentary or the girls' interesting personality.
BTW, ppl still watch this? I though people stop watching Miss Universe since they introduced cable. I actually predict an initial increase in viewership and feminists sign on to show solidarity followed by a sharp decline as they move on to their next vicitm.
Another dazed & confused and challenged bull boy
Miss America Inc., will always be highly rated by Americans.
Slartibartfast wrote:BrilliantRedVEVO wrote:Slartibartfast wrote:I'm a masculinist and I approve this message. For too long have we been left out of pageant competitions and judged only on the size of our bank accounts, the value of our assets and occasionally the wit of our personality. I demand that we be allowed to opportunity to be itemised as well and now is the ideal time to do it now that there is no danger of having a "speedo" competition (yuck!)hydroep wrote:Nice man, nice...very "progressive" of them. But ah find they coulda go de whole hog and allow transgenders in the competition as well.
That it's a women's only pageant is a tad bit sexist...isn't it?[/sarcasm]...
In other news, Miss America experiences a sharp decline in ratings next year as they realise that many viewers did not watch earlier pageants for the riveting commentary or the girls' interesting personality.
BTW, ppl still watch this? I though people stop watching Miss Universe since they introduced cable. I actually predict an initial increase in viewership and feminists sign on to show solidarity followed by a sharp decline as they move on to their next vicitm.
Another dazed & confused and challenged bull boy
Miss America Inc., will always be highly rated by Americans.
Maybe. My biggest issue is that literally could not care less about this topic and have spent more than my allotted "sh!ts" just acknowledging the existence of this thread, far more actually replying to it. Long story short, you could be right but I don't care enough to investigate it further and there is going to be some poor soul that I meet later today that I can't give a sh!t about because I wasted one on this.RedVEVO wrote:
Slave Fart you have to understand that America is very different in many ways .
Trinidad is polarized and in many instances uneducated in views . Like sheep .
Miss America will be marketed and exposed to a different market segment .
Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”
Users browsing this forum: Google Adsense [Bot] and 76 guests