Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
viralbee wrote:bushmanZ wrote:viralbee wrote:bushmanZ wrote:Looking at the damage on the Tiida, it is clear to see that the person was not hit by the front of this vehicle but landed on top of it. The blue vehicle made contact with the pedestrian first and would most likely have the frontal damage to prove it.
Pretty sure it's the Tida.
Looked at the video again. The Pedestrian was definitely hit by the Blue car first. Check it out.
I went CSI on that video. Downloaded and went through every frame. Blue car pulled to the right and was ahead when the Tida hit. Plus if the blue car hit, the witness standing on the road to the left would have seen the whole thing and this would be treated as a hit and run.
bushmanZ wrote:viralbee wrote:bushmanZ wrote:viralbee wrote:bushmanZ wrote:Looking at the damage on the Tiida, it is clear to see that the person was not hit by the front of this vehicle but landed on top of it. The blue vehicle made contact with the pedestrian first and would most likely have the frontal damage to prove it.
Pretty sure it's the Tida.
Looked at the video again. The Pedestrian was definitely hit by the Blue car first. Check it out.
I went CSI on that video. Downloaded and went through every frame. Blue car pulled to the right and was ahead when the Tida hit. Plus if the blue car hit, the witness standing on the road to the left would have seen the whole thing and this would be treated as a hit and run.
Lololol. Look at the vid again. He lands on the tiida after being knocked into the air by the Blue car. At a certain point on the video you can see that the pedestrian has already passed the lane that the tiida is driving on. You are telling me that the Tiida knocks the guy into the air at an angle and he still manages to land onto said Tiida. You had me laughing at the CSI quip though.
racedriverpro wrote:bushmanZ wrote:viralbee wrote:bushmanZ wrote:viralbee wrote:bushmanZ wrote:Looking at the damage on the Tiida, it is clear to see that the person was not hit by the front of this vehicle but landed on top of it. The blue vehicle made contact with the pedestrian first and would most likely have the frontal damage to prove it.
Pretty sure it's the Tida.
Looked at the video again. The Pedestrian was definitely hit by the Blue car first. Check it out.
I went CSI on that video. Downloaded and went through every frame. Blue car pulled to the right and was ahead when the Tida hit. Plus if the blue car hit, the witness standing on the road to the left would have seen the whole thing and this would be treated as a hit and run.
Lololol. Look at the vid again. He lands on the tiida after being knocked into the air by the Blue car. At a certain point on the video you can see that the pedestrian has already passed the lane that the tiida is driving on. You are telling me that the Tiida knocks the guy into the air at an angle and he still manages to land onto said Tiida. You had me laughing at the CSI quip though.
U did business in form 4 by chance?
dell4sell wrote:Long story short the rx sky the ball and the tiida catch it.. Rx out for duck...
On a real through the walkover RIGHT DEY... You leave the safety of the walkover to play Flappy Bird with yourself..
desifemlove wrote:sad the woman died, but then walkovers exist for a purpose.
it's the government's fault. bad road design, bad traffic design.
Now you makin sense because the underlying issue seems to be that a lot of people have a problem with making a minor diversion and walking up slight inclines. We need to make it in such a away that they could walk straight on a level surface without any form of obstruction.HSA wrote:desifemlove wrote:sad the woman died, but then walkovers exist for a purpose.
it's the government's fault. bad road design, bad traffic design.
maybe the government should put the highway over the walkover and turn it to a dual carriageway???
sMASH wrote:say it have boat cruise on top the walk over..
desifemlove wrote:Hmmm....HSA says he's smart, but dont comprehend the rudiments of highway design
I do, but not worth getting in any "argument" with dolts.
HSA wrote:desifemlove wrote:Hmmm....HSA says he's smart, but dont comprehend the rudiments of highway design
I do, but not worth getting in any "argument" with dolts.
I have two words for you......
Soft coco
AstonMartV wrote:HSA wrote:desifemlove wrote:Hmmm....HSA says he's smart, but dont comprehend the rudiments of highway design
I do, but not worth getting in any "argument" with dolts.
I have two words for you......
Soft coco
The Paleontologist wrote:Lmfao.
Thread gonna take a dread detour
HSA wrote:desifemlove wrote:Hmmm....HSA says he's smart, but dont comprehend the rudiments of highway design
I do, but not worth getting in any "argument" with dolts.
I have two words for you......
Soft coco
Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”
Users browsing this forum: ProtonPowder and 147 guests