Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
tr1ad wrote:ADONI wrote:We think the government reason to remove subsidy bad. However, if the Petroleum Association was given the chance to set their own rates on fuel, we would have to go back to donkey and bison carts.
don't understand what is the issue with the PA now, linx and credit card has been accepted for quite some time now
Redman wrote:tr1ad wrote:ADONI wrote:We think the government reason to remove subsidy bad. However, if the Petroleum Association was given the chance to set their own rates on fuel, we would have to go back to donkey and bison carts.
don't understand what is the issue with the PA now, linx and credit card has been accepted for quite some time now
The PA has been lobbying for a solution to the fact that the increases to the BL and GF...push some of the stations into a loss making scenario.
At least 8 years at this point.
It's a regulated industry.
There are limitations as to what the dealers can do.
ADONI wrote:Redman wrote:tr1ad wrote:ADONI wrote:We think the government reason to remove subsidy bad. However, if the Petroleum Association was given the chance to set their own rates on fuel, we would have to go back to donkey and bison carts.
don't understand what is the issue with the PA now, linx and credit card has been accepted for quite some time now
The PA has been lobbying for a solution to the fact that the increases to the BL and GF...push some of the stations into a loss making scenario.
At least 8 years at this point.
It's a regulated industry.
There are limitations as to what the dealers can do.
Yup, PA lobbying for removal of regulations, so they would be the ones controlling fuel prices where they go dig out people eye, making Imbutt fuel increases look like nothing.
ADONI wrote:Redman wrote:tr1ad wrote:ADONI wrote:We think the government reason to remove subsidy bad. However, if the Petroleum Association was given the chance to set their own rates on fuel, we would have to go back to donkey and bison carts.
don't understand what is the issue with the PA now, linx and credit card has been accepted for quite some time now
The PA has been lobbying for a solution to the fact that the increases to the BL and GF...push some of the stations into a loss making scenario.
At least 8 years at this point.
It's a regulated industry.
There are limitations as to what the dealers can do.
Yup, PA lobbying for removal of regulations, so they would be the ones controlling fuel prices where they go dig out people eye, making Imbutt fuel increases look like nothing.
bluesclues wrote:ADONI wrote:Redman wrote:tr1ad wrote:ADONI wrote:We think the government reason to remove subsidy bad. However, if the Petroleum Association was given the chance to set their own rates on fuel, we would have to go back to donkey and bison carts.
don't understand what is the issue with the PA now, linx and credit card has been accepted for quite some time now
The PA has been lobbying for a solution to the fact that the increases to the BL and GF...push some of the stations into a loss making scenario.
At least 8 years at this point.
It's a regulated industry.
There are limitations as to what the dealers can do.
Yup, PA lobbying for removal of regulations, so they would be the ones controlling fuel prices where they go dig out people eye, making Imbutt fuel increases look like nothing.
Trinidad, the only country that can own a pitch lake and have such horrible roads. So why not, the only country that produces oil and gas that have locals paying more than ppl in countries that import from us. It wont work tho. We in bubble territory here. Raising prices will hurt government revenues more in the long term. Setting up themselves to permanently lose market share.
tr1ad wrote:desifemlove wrote:Most likely ah Hindu man who did this at the Petroleum Association. only some move (like most of them) to push some conspiratorial Hindu agenda onto the country. His agenda look like it crumbling since the government and Unipet have seen through this already.
this really slipped me, while personal opinions are welcomed.... racist ones are not.
take a lil vacation from the forums to reflect
nervewrecker wrote:tr1ad wrote:desifemlove wrote:Most likely ah Hindu man who did this at the Petroleum Association. only some move (like most of them) to push some conspiratorial Hindu agenda onto the country. His agenda look like it crumbling since the government and Unipet have seen through this already.
this really slipped me, while personal opinions are welcomed.... racist ones are not.
take a lil vacation from the forums to reflect
Bless you kind sir, bless your soul.
Redman wrote:bluesclues wrote:ADONI wrote:Redman wrote:tr1ad wrote:ADONI wrote:We think the government reason to remove subsidy bad. However, if the Petroleum Association was given the chance to set their own rates on fuel, we would have to go back to donkey and bison carts.
don't understand what is the issue with the PA now, linx and credit card has been accepted for quite some time now
The PA has been lobbying for a solution to the fact that the increases to the BL and GF...push some of the stations into a loss making scenario.
At least 8 years at this point.
It's a regulated industry.
There are limitations as to what the dealers can do.
Yup, PA lobbying for removal of regulations, so they would be the ones controlling fuel prices where they go dig out people eye, making Imbutt fuel increases look like nothing.
Trinidad, the only country that can own a pitch lake and have such horrible roads. So why not, the only country that produces oil and gas that have locals paying more than ppl in countries that import from us. It wont work tho. We in bubble territory here. Raising prices will hurt government revenues more in the long term. Setting up themselves to permanently lose market share.
Explain that ...
sleepertercel wrote:How about using high fuel prices as the impetus to switch to more sustainable fuels, or modes of transportation?
sleepertercel wrote:How about using high fuel prices as the impetus to switch to more sustainable fuels, or modes of transportation?
I believe that you're right but it does go both ways:sMASH wrote:Well, when trying to steer people into other alternatives, the common sense approach is to make the alternatives readily available.
But this is the same set of people who wanted to have a sugar tax, not to guide public health as its intention in other countries, but as a source of revenue... with the health guidance as a side effect.
Redman wrote:The supply chain needs to be in place.
then incentives to switch
sleepertercel wrote:How about using high fuel prices as the impetus to switch to more sustainable fuels, or modes of transportation?
bluesclues wrote:Fssil fuel conservation means lower revenues for trinidad.
dude2014 wrote:Should we use less, will we have more to export? Hence more revenues.
dude2014 wrote:Should we use less, will we have more to export? Hence more revenues.
Still need some help on the figures with the gas subsidy
Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot] and 34 guests