TriniTuner.com | Latest Event:
Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
Slartibartfast wrote:pugboy wrote:The nationwide interest in this case is quite strong, how come others don't garner so much attention
Probably because she is a bit pleasant on the eyes.
Slartibartfast wrote: I find it funny also that so many people, including the media, seemed so stuck on the view that the kidnapping was related to human trafficking and sex slavery with no evidence pointing to either.
rollingstock wrote:screwbash wrote:
According to the Motor Vehicle and Road Traffic act (MVRT) a driver has to obey the instructions of a police officer in UNIFORM only. According to the police standing orders 2016 a police uniform is GREY SHIRT AND NAVY BLUE/BLACK PANTS. This full blue kit that the inspector on TV wears in NOT a police uniform and you do not have to obey his instructions. Do not stop if and unmarked car tries to pull you over and they not in uniform. Chaguanas area has a while small lancer kind of old looking with 2 plain clothes office on patrol at times. They will buss fix penalty ticket on you for traffic violations but you have to refuse to take the ticket. Everyone should get a copy of the police standing orders and see where they stand.
Like you standing on your friggin brains.
Police operational wear had been Gazetted many years now so stop uttering complete garbage.
Both of them make some strong points though I dunno who to believe more
acesinghit wrote::shock: Both of them make some strong points though I dunno who to believe more
pugboy wrote:supercop alexander has also admitted on tv the wrongness of the lack of police id# on those all blue uniforms
dunno if that has been rectified
this admittance was in similar manner to how he does defend cops blasting siren to buy doubles and drop chirren to school and bad parking all over the place lol
Turbo wrote::?
.....this thread go be re-named just now........JUH!
shake d livin wake d dead wrote:Thread hijack in process.. ..men gona debate police uniform
hustla_ambition101 wrote:Stick to the topic at hand nah, create a thread on what all you armchair lawyers believe is right and what is law
Morpheus wrote:Eh???
screwbash wrote:rollingstock wrote:screwbash wrote:
According to the Motor Vehicle and Road Traffic act (MVRT) a driver has to obey the instructions of a police officer in UNIFORM only. According to the police standing orders 2016 a police uniform is GREY SHIRT AND NAVY BLUE/BLACK PANTS. This full blue kit that the inspector on TV wears in NOT a police uniform and you do not have to obey his instructions. Do not stop if and unmarked car tries to pull you over and they not in uniform. Chaguanas area has a while small lancer kind of old looking with 2 plain clothes office on patrol at times. They will buss fix penalty ticket on you for traffic violations but you have to refuse to take the ticket. Everyone should get a copy of the police standing orders and see where they stand.
Like you standing on your friggin brains.
Police operational wear had been Gazetted many years now so stop uttering complete garbage.
you is a kinda front ah wah. Bring the gazett post. Cause it not in the MVRT or the police standing orders. if the navy blue kit is a uniform why is the word police on it made with Velcro that it can be removed easily. Tactical gear includes body kits and not just piece ah uniform, similar as the high vision vest is not part of the uniform. If an office not wearing his hat and try to stop you it is not an office in uniform.
acesinghit wrote::shock: Both of them make some strong points though I dunno who to believe more
66. Where a police constable in uniform is engaged in the regulation of traffic in a road or where a traffic sign, being a sign of the prescribed size, colour and type or of another character authorised by the Licensing Authority under section 64 or where a notice of the Commissioner of Police under section 68 has been lawfully placed on or near a road, a person driving or propelling a vehicle who—
(a) neglects or refuses to stop the vehicle or to make
it proceed in or keep to, a particular line of traffic when directed to do so by the police constable in the execution of his duty; or
(b) fails to comply with the indication given by the
sign or the notice,
is liable on summary conviction for a first offence to a fine of two thousand dollars and on any subsequent conviction to a fine of four thousand dollars and imprisonment for twelve months.
rollingstock wrote:screwbash wrote:rollingstock wrote:screwbash wrote:
According to the Motor Vehicle and Road Traffic act (MVRT) a driver has to obey the instructions of a police officer in UNIFORM only. According to the police standing orders 2016 a police uniform is GREY SHIRT AND NAVY BLUE/BLACK PANTS. This full blue kit that the inspector on TV wears in NOT a police uniform and you do not have to obey his instructions. Do not stop if and unmarked car tries to pull you over and they not in uniform. Chaguanas area has a while small lancer kind of old looking with 2 plain clothes office on patrol at times. They will buss fix penalty ticket on you for traffic violations but you have to refuse to take the ticket. Everyone should get a copy of the police standing orders and see where they stand.
Like you standing on your friggin brains.
Police operational wear had been Gazetted many years now so stop uttering complete garbage.
you is a kinda front ah wah. Bring the gazett post. Cause it not in the MVRT or the police standing orders. if the navy blue kit is a uniform why is the word police on it made with Velcro that it can be removed easily. Tactical gear includes body kits and not just piece ah uniform, similar as the high vision vest is not part of the uniform. If an office not wearing his hat and try to stop you it is not an office in uniform.
C.unt there is more than one police uniform Gazetted, ALL can perform stops under the mv&rt act.
screwbash wrote:aidan wrote:so if i was to get pull over/intercepted by an "unmarked" vehicle and persons in police gear come out, how am I to know if is legit police and I not going and get corn/kidnap. could i call 999? or would I also get charged for using cellphone and driving[
According to the Motor Vehicle and Road Traffic act (MVRT) a driver has to obey the instructions of a police officer in UNIFORM only. According to the police standing orders 2016 a police uniform is GREY SHIRT AND NAVY BLUE/BLACK PANTS. This full blue kit that the inspector on TV wears in NOT a police uniform and you do not have to obey his instructions. Do not stop if and unmarked car tries to pull you over and they not in uniform. Chaguanas area has a while small lancer kind of old looking with 2 plain clothes office on patrol at times. They will buss fix penalty ticket on you for traffic violations but you have to refuse to take the ticket. Everyone should get a copy of the police standing orders and see where they stand.
bluesclues wrote:
Either way, i know u not tellin me... 11pm on my way back from maracas, i eh do nuttn, a black xtrail pullin alongside me tellin me to pull over, i look in the vehicle and cant make out no police, seeing men in tshirt and ting showing me gun, and i going and pullover? I might not even play dat and put down a drive to send them off a precipice. Then i drivin straight to the station and 'report it how i see it'!
nervewrecker wrote:Just yesterday I see people refuse to pull aside and let the police pass. This mentality is why the police always late to the crime scene. Then we blame the police.
When all police are painted with the same brush, is only a matter of time before they conform and just don't care anymore.
Anyone familiar with self fulfilling prophecy? Research it
rollingstock wrote:66. Where a police constable in uniform is engaged in the regulation of traffic in a road or where a traffic sign, being a sign of the prescribed size, colour and type or of another character authorised by the Licensing Authority under section 64 or where a notice of the Commissioner of Police under section 68 has been lawfully placed on or near a road, a person driving or propelling a vehicle who—
(a) neglects or refuses to stop the vehicle or to make
it proceed in or keep to, a particular line of traffic when directed to do so by the police constable in the execution of his duty; or
(b) fails to comply with the indication given by the
sign or the notice,
is liable on summary conviction for a first offence to a fine of two thousand dollars and on any subsequent conviction to a fine of four thousand dollars and imprisonment for twelve months.
The mv&rt act just states in uniform, still trying to understand where screwtuntunheadbash getting his info
hustla_ambition101 wrote:Call d muddaneckin commissioner and ask him then
Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 28 guests
