TriniTuner.com | Latest Event:
Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
baigan wrote:lol I'd change it from Mclaren to MAClaren
LOLbaigan wrote:lol I'd change it from Mclaren to MAClaren
Mr. Sennin wrote:nos_specialist wrote:And then they took out the exhaust
Lool
well Facebook paid US$22bn for WhatsappDizzy28 wrote:Can't believe Beats Headphones were worth more than Mclaren Technology Group!!!
EFFECTIC DESIGNS wrote:Funny thing those $200 US beats headphones cost $13 to make and its chinese trash. LOL the absolute shittiest headphones on the planet goes to show the power of marketing.
BRZ wrote:IT would be rather interesting if apple has any design input into the engines
may be they will design something like this:
All Aluminum BLOCK with absolutely NO PORTS!
teems1 wrote:EFFECTIC DESIGNS wrote:Funny thing those $200 US beats headphones cost $13 to make and its chinese trash. LOL the absolute shittiest headphones on the planet goes to show the power of marketing.
Technically you're paying for the brand.
People use the beats as a fashion accessory, so if they want to spend the money let them...
Beats also puts useless metal in the headphones just for weight so that it feels like premium headphones.
Duane 3NE 2NR wrote:well Facebook paid US$22bn for WhatsappDizzy28 wrote:Can't believe Beats Headphones were worth more than Mclaren Technology Group!!!
http://www.forbes.com/sites/parmyolson/ ... 9d6e1d179e
but yeah I hear you
Toothpaste and terminals
When we look at the potential of Apple buying or investing heavily in McLaren, most are unanimous in thinking Apple is unlikely to get into the business of making or even caring about supercars, and we're not going to see an Apple F1 team. But there's far more to McLaren than that. For instance, did you know that when you come into land at Heathrow, the gate you find yourself is determined by McLaren's technology? It analyses which planes are landing and when, and optimises gate selection to get people out of the airport more quickly.
In recent years, the company has directed its knowledge of extreme efficiency into other industries through McLaren Applied Technologies, a division that brings racing innovations to more mundane scenarios. In one quirky example, MAT was brought in to add some pit-lane insight into GlaxoSmithKline's toothpaste production line. GSK wanted to shorten the amount of time it took to switch which specific type of toothpaste was being put into the tubes - a process which took 39 minutes. With McLaren's help, they got that down to 15 minutes. It meant an extra six million tubes could be made each year. That and additional manufacturing cost savings meant GSK earned an extra £100m.
http://www.bbc.com/news/technology-37436171
baigan wrote:teems1 wrote:EFFECTIC DESIGNS wrote:Funny thing those $200 US beats headphones cost $13 to make and its chinese trash. LOL the absolute shittiest headphones on the planet goes to show the power of marketing.
Technically you're paying for the brand.
People use the beats as a fashion accessory, so if they want to spend the money let them...
Beats also puts useless metal in the headphones just for weight so that it feels like premium headphones.
Yep, they were designed to be more of a fashion statement. It's absolutely brilliant, and A+ marketing. Give celebrities to wear them, be diverse in your marketing and create an elite culture surrounding the headphones. Aka You're not buying the headphones
You're buying a membership into a VIP club, before it gets saturated at least. It's the same strategy used by many entrepreneurs, from the creators of facebook to Instagram
From a sound quality standpoint you're better off buying other headphones..lol
Kronik wrote:baigan wrote:teems1 wrote:EFFECTIC DESIGNS wrote:Funny thing those $200 US beats headphones cost $13 to make and its chinese trash. LOL the absolute shittiest headphones on the planet goes to show the power of marketing.
Technically you're paying for the brand.
People use the beats as a fashion accessory, so if they want to spend the money let them...
Beats also puts useless metal in the headphones just for weight so that it feels like premium headphones.
Yep, they were designed to be more of a fashion statement. It's absolutely brilliant, and A+ marketing. Give celebrities to wear them, be diverse in your marketing and create an elite culture surrounding the headphones. Aka You're not buying the headphones
You're buying a membership into a VIP club, before it gets saturated at least. It's the same strategy used by many entrepreneurs, from the creators of facebook to Instagram
From a sound quality standpoint you're better off buying other headphones..lol
Fork beats, I good with my Sennheiser
Kronik wrote:How the bass on that teems? My over ear Sennheiser headphone has excellent sound clarity, but does not have the kinda bass the in ear one has
Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], death365, Duane 3NE 2NR and 45 guests
