TriniTuner.com | Latest Event:
Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
pugboy wrote:unless laws have changed, lets not be ignorant of simple procedures
the law of a summons is it is a piece of paper stating the charge and the person serving it must make sure it physically touches the person whom it should be served on
they don't have to hand it to them just be in front of them, touch them with it and mumble something
can drop it on the ground after, but once contact made it is considered served.
there are no laws saying once you got contacted by phone you are hereby served with the summons to answer a charge in court.
How does the court/law/police know that who answered the phone is the correct person ?
So lets not be stupid.
Who did they charge by checking the camera footage ?
The only person they could officially trace would be the owner of the car based on the plate,
Unless there is a database of pictures of all drivers and they have a computer program to do face identification
like facebook/google, but surely there are no laws on this or using some third party computer to do this reliably and standup in court to say Mr X was driving the car based on our national ID picture database, lol
Afaik no such program exists which would standup in court.
Can the owner of a car be charged if someone else driving the car broke a traffic law with the said car ?
Suppose it is a company owned car ?
These are basic questions to ask first before saying cctv could charge people.
If any laws to enforce by cctv were changed there would have been massive media coverage similar to the laser gun introduction
Morpheus wrote:scotty_buttons wrote:Yeah. But shouldn't they let the public know this is going to implemented and when?
But why though? Shouldn't we be obeying the law all along?
We get upset when police broadcast too many details on their intended next move. "They alerting the bandits so they could hide their weapons/narcotics!"
I guess it is a norm to announce those strategies for "minor infractions" though......
the_doctor wrote:Morpheus wrote:scotty_buttons wrote:Yeah. But shouldn't they let the public know this is going to implemented and when?
But why though? Shouldn't we be obeying the law all along?
We get upset when police broadcast too many details on their intended next move. "They alerting the bandits so they could hide their weapons/narcotics!"
I guess it is a norm to announce those strategies for "minor infractions" though......
Well said Mr Morpheus...
Sent from my SM-G925I using TriniTuner mobile app
Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”
Users browsing this forum: Google Adsense [Bot] and 32 guests