Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
Picasso wrote:All this Kyack talk.... Just buy a jammer and done!!I already ordered mine.. Will be doing some testing in a couple days when it's here.
Picasso wrote:All this Kyack talk.... Just buy a jammer and done!!I already ordered mine.. Will be doing some testing in a couple days when it's here.
ingalook wrote:
The slowing down and speeding up is reduced, hence there is a flow - if you will get a ticket @81km you won't overtake even if someone is doing 70km on the left lane because during the act of overtaking you will cross 80 and get a ticket.
Coming back to the carrying capacity of the road, if your journey would take you about 30 mins and now it takes 45 mins CERTAINLY there is a reduction in the amount of vehicles that can use the highway in any given time period.
Duane 3NE 2NR wrote:to remind yourself
ingalook wrote:EmilioA wrote:ingalook wrote:EmilioA wrote:ingalook wrote:So the government very effectively reduced the average speed motorist drive on the highway from 110km to 80km overnight - good job there...
They also reduced the carrying capacity of the highway by over 27% overnight as well...
Why don't they barricade the 3rd Lane while they at it - since it seems like they are intent on moving backward
You cant actually say that. Traffic moves like a wave not a fluid. I recall reading studies showing that slower speeds actually increase capacity since most traffic jams are caused by fast cars having to drastically change speeds when another car moves from lane to lane.
If you moving into a lane, a car in that lane has to decrease his speed to give you a chance. leading to the car behind him having to slow down slightly more and on and on until somebody about 15 cars behind has to actually stop. And of course everybody behind him has to stop too even if only for a few seconds. But that stopping continues to ripple backwards as a wave.
Now if the right lane isnt moving fast to begin with , that allows a smoother transition with less need for braking. hence fewer traffic jams.
Traffic moves like a wave when people are not terrified of being charged for being 5km over the speed limit - if they are, then it moves like a fluid.
Expect the average speed to fall to 70-75 after people stop trusting their speedos
Traffic moves like a wave when people are not terrified of being charged for being 5km over the speed limit - if they are, then it moves like a fluid.
Elaborate on this please . I trying to understand the physics of it.
The slowing down and speeding up is reduced, hence there is a flow - if you will get a ticket @81km you won't overtake even if someone is doing 70km on the left lane because during the act of overtaking you will cross 80 and get a ticket.
Coming back to the carrying capacity of the road, if your journey would take you about 30 mins and now it takes 45 mins CERTAINLY there is a reduction in the amount of vehicles that can use the highway in any given time period.
Jon_One wrote:What i will like to know is if a radar detector is illegal or detectable by this laser/ radar gun ..
i already know the jammers are illegal...
i dont want to jam there signal . i just want to know if they are there before i get in there sights so i can get my self in check ..
Jon_One wrote:ok so i just learnt that a detector wont make much sense with the laser technology because the detector will not pick up the signal fast enough .. if it was radar tech and not laser that wouldve been a different story
Tigs wrote:Anyone heard anything about T vehicles' speed limit being 65km/h?
*$kїđž![TRADE MARK SIGN] wrote:Pass them heading north just now ....el Socorro walk over area....hiding in the dark.....with the tripod......a few cops further down the road ready to stop cars.....
Driving at 80 was very sickening....and risky spending so much more time on the roads....
http://www.trinituner.com/v4/forums/viewtopic.php?f=4&t=667521sentraman wrote:
*$kїđž!™ wrote::bday:http://www.trinituner.com/v4/forums/viewtopic.php?f=4&t=667521sentraman wrote:
Already discussed....it's 80km....except for rangers
Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 34 guests