Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
pjfred wrote:Well he so dunce, finish the ex Brian Lara stadium with the 90 million and forget the hospital couva beyotch. Yes I said beyotch cause like many you blinded by the PNM.
Like the name shottaboilife, like bullahman PNM dotish supporter
Les Bain wrote:j.o.e wrote:DVSTT wrote:matthewmazda wrote:zoom rader wrote:A public in fear 7 murders for this weekend.
Where is Rowley
where is Kamala
Where is Manning?
Today is Pan semis .... Where is Panday??
Where is Chambers?
daxt0r wrote:All ah dem definitely not caring about this situation, in dem head is just some people from ah safe seat ded, nobody important or their family so y care? Do ah lil PR and daiz it.
I sincerely believe that all ah dem does go drink an enjoy theyself after parliament and laugh at we fools who spends time arguing. Probably readin up threads like these an killin they self wit laugh an knockin down premium liquor
Wa we hav to remember is at d end of the d day dem getting well paid, safe and secure and doh give ah chit bout we, so think bout da nex time u vote
SimSimmer69 wrote:pjfred wrote:Well he so dunce, finish the ex Brian Lara stadium with the 90 million and forget the hospital couva beyotch. Yes I said beyotch cause like many you blinded by the PNM.
Like the name shottaboilife, like bullahman PNM dotish supporter
How much would the Couva hospital take to be completed?
How much was spent on it already?
How much money is left outstanding to be paid to contractors who have already done work on the project?
Would that figure past the 90 million?
Do we have sufficient staff (doctors, security, IT, nurses, morgue staff, etc) to legally open it?
If you can't answer these questions then you're assuming that 90 million would be enough. At the end of the day, the previous PM needs to explain to the country why she had a ribbon cutting ceremony for a hospital that wasn't ready to be opened to the public.
Habit7 wrote:Well so far you are using this incident to launch a tirade against me.De Dragon wrote:Habit7 wrote:Whatever dude, continue to dance on ppl's grave. I done talk.
![]()
![]()
You are really a different and special kind of dotish yes! Where the fack you see me rejoicing? What the fack is there to rejoice about? Would you have rejoiced if it was pre-September 7th? No! but here you are making arsehole comments and telling me I rejoicing about two youthmen death.
Up to now I haven't seen you offer condolences to the family or even condemn the killers. That is why I say you dancing on their graves, not rejoicing. You are paying scant regard to the actual lives lost, but going on into your own narrative.
De Dragon wrote:Habit7 wrote:Well so far you are using this incident to launch a tirade against me.De Dragon wrote:Habit7 wrote:Whatever dude, continue to dance on ppl's grave. I done talk.
![]()
![]()
You are really a different and special kind of dotish yes! Where the fack you see me rejoicing? What the fack is there to rejoice about? Would you have rejoiced if it was pre-September 7th? No! but here you are making arsehole comments and telling me I rejoicing about two youthmen death.
Up to now I haven't seen you offer condolences to the family or even condemn the killers. That is why I say you dancing on their graves, not rejoicing. You are paying scant regard to the actual lives lost, but going on into your own narrative.
Expect more of the same when you post that drivel. How does not offering condolences equate to rejoicing over their deaths? Tirade against you? Men actually accuse the youths outright of gangsterism and worse, yet you singled me out to accuse of taking pleasure in their deaths. Your hypocrisy/toting is endless.
Habit7 wrote:De Dragon wrote:Habit7 wrote:Well so far you are using this incident to launch a tirade against me.De Dragon wrote:Habit7 wrote:Whatever dude, continue to dance on ppl's grave. I done talk.
![]()
![]()
You are really a different and special kind of dotish yes! Where the fack you see me rejoicing? What the fack is there to rejoice about? Would you have rejoiced if it was pre-September 7th? No! but here you are making arsehole comments and telling me I rejoicing about two youthmen death.
Up to now I haven't seen you offer condolences to the family or even condemn the killers. That is why I say you dancing on their graves, not rejoicing. You are paying scant regard to the actual lives lost, but going on into your own narrative.
Expect more of the same when you post that drivel. How does not offering condolences equate to rejoicing over their deaths? Tirade against you? Men actually accuse the youths outright of gangsterism and worse, yet you singled me out to accuse of taking pleasure in their deaths. Your hypocrisy/toting is endless.
I never said you rejoiced over their deaths.
My post came before any accusation of gangsterism.
I never singled you out, it was you who responded to me as if it fall in your garden.
Why do you rush in all these threads so hot and sweaty while being so wrong and strong?
Habit7 wrote:De Dragon wrote:Habit7 wrote:Well so far you are using this incident to launch a tirade against me.De Dragon wrote:Habit7 wrote:Whatever dude, continue to dance on ppl's grave. I done talk.
![]()
![]()
You are really a different and special kind of dotish yes! Where the fack you see me rejoicing? What the fack is there to rejoice about? Would you have rejoiced if it was pre-September 7th? No! but here you are making arsehole comments and telling me I rejoicing about two youthmen death.
Up to now I haven't seen you offer condolences to the family or even condemn the killers. That is why I say you dancing on their graves, not rejoicing. You are paying scant regard to the actual lives lost, but going on into your own narrative.
Expect more of the same when you post that drivel. How does not offering condolences equate to rejoicing over their deaths? Tirade against you? Men actually accuse the youths outright of gangsterism and worse, yet you singled me out to accuse of taking pleasure in their deaths. Your hypocrisy/toting is endless.
I never said you rejoiced over their deaths.
My post came before any accusation of gangsterism.
I never singled you out, it was you who responded to me as if it fall in your garden.
Why do you rush in all these threads so hot and sweaty while being so wrong and strong?
Habit7 wrote:Well so far you are using this incident to launch a tirade against me.De Dragon wrote:Habit7 wrote:Whatever dude, continue to dance on ppl's grave. I done talk.
![]()
![]()
You are really a different and special kind of dotish yes! Where the fack you see me rejoicing? What the fack is there to rejoice about? Would you have rejoiced if it was pre-September 7th? No! but here you are making arsehole comments and telling me I rejoicing about two youthmen death.
Up to now I haven't seen you offer condolences to the family or even condemn the killers. That is why I say you dancing on their graves, not rejoicing. You are paying scant regard to the actual lives lost, but going on into your own narrative.
Habit7 wrote:Well I think I made it clear above that you are the one ascribing beliefs without evidence.
And I already explained why I said you dancing on their graves:Habit7 wrote:Well so far you are using this incident to launch a tirade against me.De Dragon wrote:Habit7 wrote:Whatever dude, continue to dance on ppl's grave. I done talk.
![]()
![]()
You are really a different and special kind of dotish yes! Where the fack you see me rejoicing? What the fack is there to rejoice about? Would you have rejoiced if it was pre-September 7th? No! but here you are making arsehole comments and telling me I rejoicing about two youthmen death.
Up to now I haven't seen you offer condolences to the family or even condemn the killers. That is why I say you dancing on their graves, not rejoicing. You are paying scant regard to the actual lives lost, but going on into your own narrative.
So in the interest of not dragging me into your axe to grind, I am ending this back and forth now.
De Dragon wrote:Habit7 wrote:Well I think I made it clear above that you are the one ascribing beliefs without evidence.
And I already explained why I said you dancing on their graves:Habit7 wrote:Well so far you are using this incident to launch a tirade against me.De Dragon wrote:Habit7 wrote:Whatever dude, continue to dance on ppl's grave. I done talk.
![]()
![]()
You are really a different and special kind of dotish yes! Where the fack you see me rejoicing? What the fack is there to rejoice about? Would you have rejoiced if it was pre-September 7th? No! but here you are making arsehole comments and telling me I rejoicing about two youthmen death.
Up to now I haven't seen you offer condolences to the family or even condemn the killers. That is why I say you dancing on their graves, not rejoicing. You are paying scant regard to the actual lives lost, but going on into your own narrative.
So in the interest of not dragging me into your axe to grind, I am ending this back and forth now.
Man post where he said, actually said "continue to dance on ppl's graves" as proof that he didn't say that yes!![]()
![]()
Run away while you can, because you have been exposed as a liar. Sadly you will continue to lie and be exposed.
Allergic2BunnyEars wrote:De Dragon wrote:Habit7 wrote:Well I think I made it clear above that you are the one ascribing beliefs without evidence.
And I already explained why I said you dancing on their graves:Habit7 wrote:Well so far you are using this incident to launch a tirade against me.De Dragon wrote:Habit7 wrote:Whatever dude, continue to dance on ppl's grave. I done talk.
![]()
![]()
You are really a different and special kind of dotish yes! Where the fack you see me rejoicing? What the fack is there to rejoice about? Would you have rejoiced if it was pre-September 7th? No! but here you are making arsehole comments and telling me I rejoicing about two youthmen death.
Up to now I haven't seen you offer condolences to the family or even condemn the killers. That is why I say you dancing on their graves, not rejoicing. You are paying scant regard to the actual lives lost, but going on into your own narrative.
So in the interest of not dragging me into your axe to grind, I am ending this back and forth now.
Man post where he said, actually said "continue to dance on ppl's graves" as proof that he didn't say that yes!![]()
![]()
Run away while you can, because you have been exposed as a liar. Sadly you will continue to lie and be exposed.
Ah wouldn't lie. You could real beat up and miss words in bold just to make a point that isn't there.
De Dragon wrote:Allergic2BunnyEars wrote:De Dragon wrote:Habit7 wrote:Well I think I made it clear above that you are the one ascribing beliefs without evidence.
And I already explained why I said you dancing on their graves:Habit7 wrote:Well so far you are using this incident to launch a tirade against me.De Dragon wrote:Habit7 wrote:Whatever dude, continue to dance on ppl's grave. I done talk.
![]()
![]()
You are really a different and special kind of dotish yes! Where the fack you see me rejoicing? What the fack is there to rejoice about? Would you have rejoiced if it was pre-September 7th? No! but here you are making arsehole comments and telling me I rejoicing about two youthmen death.
Up to now I haven't seen you offer condolences to the family or even condemn the killers. That is why I say you dancing on their graves, not rejoicing. You are paying scant regard to the actual lives lost, but going on into your own narrative.
So in the interest of not dragging me into your axe to grind, I am ending this back and forth now.
Man post where he said, actually said "continue to dance on ppl's graves" as proof that he didn't say that yes!![]()
![]()
Run away while you can, because you have been exposed as a liar. Sadly you will continue to lie and be exposed.
Ah wouldn't lie. You could real beat up and miss words in bold just to make a point that isn't there.
With all due respect, I think Habit7 doesn't need an advocate, so fack off! That bold enough for you?
Allergic2BunnyEars wrote:De Dragon wrote:Allergic2BunnyEars wrote:De Dragon wrote:Habit7 wrote:Well I think I made it clear above that you are the one ascribing beliefs without evidence.
And I already explained why I said you dancing on their graves:Habit7 wrote:Well so far you are using this incident to launch a tirade against me.De Dragon wrote:Habit7 wrote:Whatever dude, continue to dance on ppl's grave. I done talk.
![]()
![]()
You are really a different and special kind of dotish yes! Where the fack you see me rejoicing? What the fack is there to rejoice about? Would you have rejoiced if it was pre-September 7th? No! but here you are making arsehole comments and telling me I rejoicing about two youthmen death.
Up to now I haven't seen you offer condolences to the family or even condemn the killers. That is why I say you dancing on their graves, not rejoicing. You are paying scant regard to the actual lives lost, but going on into your own narrative.
So in the interest of not dragging me into your axe to grind, I am ending this back and forth now.
Man post where he said, actually said "continue to dance on ppl's graves" as proof that he didn't say that yes!![]()
![]()
Run away while you can, because you have been exposed as a liar. Sadly you will continue to lie and be exposed.
Ah wouldn't lie. You could real beat up and miss words in bold just to make a point that isn't there.
With all due respect, I think Habit7 doesn't need an advocate, so fack off! That bold enough for you?
Don't think you beat up this much even when your own relative was murdered.
De Dragon wrote:Allergic2BunnyEars wrote:De Dragon wrote:Allergic2BunnyEars wrote:De Dragon wrote:Habit7 wrote:Well I think I made it clear above that you are the one ascribing beliefs without evidence.
And I already explained why I said you dancing on their graves:Well so far you are using this incident to launch a tirade against me.Habit7 wrote:De Dragon wrote:[quote="Habit7"]Whatever dude, continue to dance on ppl's grave. I done talk.
![]()
![]()
You are really a different and special kind of dotish yes! Where the fack you see me rejoicing? What the fack is there to rejoice about? Would you have rejoiced if it was pre-September 7th? No! but here you are making arsehole comments and telling me I rejoicing about two youthmen death.
Up to now I haven't seen you offer condolences to the family or even condemn the killers. That is why I say you dancing on their graves, not rejoicing. You are paying scant regard to the actual lives lost, but going on into your own narrative.
So in the interest of not dragging me into your axe to grind, I am ending this back and forth now.
Man post where he said, actually said "continue to dance on ppl's graves" as proof that he didn't say that yes!![]()
![]()
Run away while you can, because you have been exposed as a liar. Sadly you will continue to lie and be exposed.
Ah wouldn't lie. You could real beat up and miss words in bold just to make a point that isn't there.
With all due respect, I think Habit7 doesn't need an advocate, so fack off! That bold enough for you?
Don't think you beat up this much even when your own relative was murdered.
De Dragon wrote:I think Habit7 can speak for himself, he doesn't need you to play spokesman, or lawyer, or whatever it is that you feel that you are doing here.
maj. tom wrote:Where did Gandalf go/what was he doing between the time Smaug was killed and when he discovered that it was the One Ring that Frodo now possessed, that Bilbo had all those years? Like 60 years and more had passed I believe, plus about another 20 years with Frodo.
S_2NR wrote:De Dragon wrote:I think Habit7 can speak for himself, he doesn't need you to play spokesman, or lawyer, or whatever it is that you feel that you are doing here.
Why you letting these men get to you on a small local forum bro? Just close browser and forget them
maj. tom wrote:Where did Gandalf go/what was he doing between the time Smaug was killed and when he discovered that it was the One Ring that Frodo now possessed, that Bilbo had all those years? Like 60 years and more had passed I believe, plus about another 20 years with Frodo.
De Dragon wrote:S_2NR wrote:De Dragon wrote:I think Habit7 can speak for himself, he doesn't need you to play spokesman, or lawyer, or whatever it is that you feel that you are doing here.
Why you letting these men get to you on a small local forum bro? Just close browser and forget them
Dem cyah get to me, dem cud talk all dey want, but Habit7 have ah disgusting way of putting motives/feelings to people that I eh tolerating at all.
zoom rader wrote:He says he works in an oil company but spends all his time on tuner, I don't know what work he does. Seems a normal PNM worker of low productivity.
Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 363 guests