Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
sMASH wrote:^^so why even bother...
rfari wrote:sMASH wrote:^^so why even bother...
I dunno. We just hope that eventually someone will do the right thing because its the right thing to do. Growley has his chance now so its just to see. For all we know, we could get take again for the next 5 years
zoom rader wrote:rfari wrote:sMASH wrote:^^so why even bother...
I dunno. We just hope that eventually someone will do the right thing because its the right thing to do. Growley has his chance now so its just to see. For all we know, we could get take again for the next 5 years
Rowley need to watch the middle men.
sMASH wrote:^^so why even bother...
wagonrunner wrote:Is this verified?
wagonrunner wrote:Is this verified?
rfari wrote:The_Honourable wrote:The only person who can run and control the UNC at this point is more than likely Mickaela Panday.
I believe she will nominate herself in the UNC internal elections whenever it is called. Just like what Rowley did since 2010, rebuilding and restoring the PNM, Mickaela can do the same with the UNC from now till 2020.
Right now on UNC fb page they burning her like rawan. She is her daddy in print and UNC supporters still hold him personally responsible a chain of political defeats
zoom rader wrote:Rfari, Wey the rest non PNM Tuners gone mamoo
pete wrote:I feel tapatalk/tuner trolling..
The_Honourable wrote:rfari wrote:The_Honourable wrote:The only person who can run and control the UNC at this point is more than likely Mickaela Panday.
I believe she will nominate herself in the UNC internal elections whenever it is called. Just like what Rowley did since 2010, rebuilding and restoring the PNM, Mickaela can do the same with the UNC from now till 2020.
Right now on UNC fb page they burning her like rawan. She is her daddy in print and UNC supporters still hold him personally responsible a chain of political defeats
Dey going thru dey phase![]()
Many PNMites burn Rowley in 2010 cause they held him responsible for the defeat but he persevered. I'm sure Mickaela can do the same if given the chance. With the mentality like her father, that is exactly what is needed in the UNC right now... clear house.
UML wrote:Mods ban meh nah
wagonrunner wrote:Is this verified?
EFFECTIC DESIGNS wrote:sMASH wrote:^^so why even bother...
We really only have 2 choices in this country, PNM or UNC.
But hey atleast its still a choice, at most we can keep rotating every 5 years till we finally get someone who will do as rfari said, do the right thing simply because its the right thing.
Kamla and the cabal will be gone in 5 years, thats half a decade. If Rowley do the same sheit he go be gone I am sure and so the cycle will keep going, its better than outright giving up. Its clear by now that trinis are not tolerating this die hard party voting sheit anymore. The electorate will keep rotating the UNC and PNM till someone does the right thing but here is hoping to Rowley doing the right thing.
EFFECTIC DESIGNS wrote:rfari wrote:Problem is that UNC can't attract candidates and members with intellectual capacity to carry the party forward.
And they have no interest in partnering with 'PNM people' to innovate and bring fresh ideas to the table.
The UNC is more arrogant than the PNM is what the problem is. They felt because they won 2/3 majority in 2010 that they were too high up and they were untouchable but enough chop with that axe even the largest tree can fall.
PNM was lucky because manning screwed up and Dr Rowley fought a very hard fight he had to deal with misinformation and propaganda that made him out to look like the bad guy, it was not easy having that clip played day and night with Manning calling him a raging bull. But now the PNM is in a position 50 times stronger than they were in the past.
Dr Rowley made sure he picked his candidates well, young and hard working people, my good friend from Grande came by me Saturday and he told me the MP the PNM sent up for Grande was going to every house with book and pen, taking down notes on what the people needed while Sancho didn't even know where the beach was. Just imagine Kamla put back Ganga Singh this utter non performer, and people called the radio station, told her they will vote PNM in St Joseph they will vote PNM in Tunapuna unless she removes this non performer. But Kamla was riding a bit too high.
She must gracefully exit politics along with the entire Cabal and never return.
does not seem to be accurate.wagonrunner wrote:Is this verified?
pete wrote:I feel tapatalk/tuner trolling..
Habit7 wrote:Habit7 wrote:The problem with the UNC's campaign is that it targeted an anti-Rowley sentiment thus galvanising its base. But PNM's campaign was all embracing.
So while UNC won their safe seats with huge margins (thus the popular vote) they lost the swing voters and undecideds.
Tomorrow I will deal with the pollsters ....
Is it clear that all the pollsters were wrong? I even saw NACTA's Vishnu Bisram live on CNC3 wining like a pickaxe say PP going to win 21-22 only for him to disappear from the screen but still declare PNM will win.
HHB was the closest http://www.guardian.co.tt/news/2015-09- ... voured-win but Nigel Henry get knocked down a few notches in terms of respect in my view.
GML pollster vindicated for calling PNM win
Yvonne Baboolal
Published: Wednesday, September 9, 2015
H.H.B. & Associates managing director Louis Bertrand said yesterday he felt vindicated after the poll commissioned by Guardian Media Limited (GML) which he conducted was the only one which correctly called Monday’s general election result, 23-18 in favour of the People’s National Movement.
He said he came under a fair amount of pressure after the poll was published in the T&T Guardian and aired on CNC3 but was glad his work had stood the test.
“In true Trini fashion, some people said I was PNM. I am not PNM. I am not a member of the PNM,” Bertrand said.
His three polls for the T&T Guardian showed Prime Minister-elect Dr Keith Rowley’s favourability ratings steadily increasing in the build up to the September 7 polls.
His last poll on the weekend centered on five marginals — Toco/Sangre Grande, St Joseph, Tunapuna, San Fernando West and Lopinot/Bon Air West — and showed constituents favouring the PNM.
But he said no one believed its validity until the findings proved true when the PNM captured all the seats he called.
The PNM also took Moruga/Tableland from the UNC, which Bertrand did not call. However, Bertrand said he did not poll Moruga/Tableland because of funding constraints. His last poll predicted a 22/19 win for the PNM, without Moruga/Tableland.
Bertrand said polls commissioned by political scientist Dr Hamid Ghany and Dr Vishnu Bisram of NACTA got it wrong when they predicted the PP would win the election.
Solution by Simulation’s Nigel Henry, meanwhile, predicted 18/18, saying five of the seats were too close to call. Bertrand dismissed that, however, saying if a poll cannot predict marginal seats it is not a poll. He said it did not make sense to predict which safe seats a party would win.
As to how he managed to get it right, he said: “It really has to do with doing proper random sampling and having a very good set of interviewers. I have very good interviewers.”
Bertrand said during the campaign a newspaper article tried to make it look as though his company was old and outdated but noted he had been doing polls for a long time and calling them right.
“People would not know this because I have been doing them for political parties and they don’t usually publish their polls,” he said, adding his company has been around a long time and he has been actively polling since the 1970s.
Asked what factors may have contributed to the PP’s loss, Bertrand said the party “made some clear mistakes” in its election campaign. One of them was a massive overkill in its advertising campaign.
“If you keep repeating an ad endlessly it will eventually irritate you, no matter how good it is,” he added.
Another mistake was exclusive focus on former prime minister Kamla Persad-Bissessar at the expense of her other candidates.
The PP’s No Rowley campaign did not work either, he said. Bertrand’s poll found only ten per cent of the people interviewed were affected by it.
However, there was an element of the election results political analysts should find fascinating, he said. While his polls measured 20 per cent going back to the PNM, the results showed something more was at play.
“One surprise may be that there were undecided voters in the marginals who were former UNC/PP supporters who shifted to the PNM,” he said.
http://www.guardian.co.tt/news/2015-09- ... ng-pnm-win
Pollsters’ methods obsolete
Published on Sep 8, 2015, 7:23 pm AST
As the election results have shown, the pollsters got it all wrong. They could put any spin on it, but the fact is that their polling methods were shown to be unscientific and obsolete.
Ironically, seats deemed by the pollsters to be too close to call were, in fact, won by large majorities, making complete nonsense of the pollsters’ predictions.
I do hope that on the next occasion, these pollsters would take their work more seriously so that we can have a proper discussion of their poll results.
Colm Imbert
via e-mail
http://www.trinidadexpress.com/20150908 ... s-obsolete
The_Honourable wrote:The only person who can run and control the UNC at this point is more than likely Mickaela Panday.
I believe she will nominate herself in the UNC internal elections whenever it is called. Just like what Rowley did since 2010, rebuilding and restoring the PNM, Mickaela can do the same with the UNC from now till 2020.
Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 157 guests