Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
rfari wrote:Uml, wha u think bout Gary Griffith bai? Talk bout oh he issa witness. Wha do he bai?
slippy1 wrote:Give an ass enough rope and he will hang him self...Ramloagan yuh DEAD!!! HAHAHA
Hyperion wrote:Its disturbing to see the lengths people go to to distort the facts in order to vindicate their political biases. This may be surprising to learn, but there are actually people in Trinidad and Tobago who are neither UNC nor PNM. All these people want is for the government of the day to be transparent in their dealings and actions, especially since the PP tooted their own horn on the election platforms in 2010, about a new style of government and leadership.
Why is it that every time someone adopts a position that does not align with that of the PP, they are immediately and automatically branded as PNM? That button is stuck on replay, it deliberately distracts from the issues at hand.
The unfortunate attempts at character assassination on David West do not take away from the fact that serious allegations have been made, and appear to have been lent credence by Gary Griffith's position.
The AG's response that this is political is obviously intended to foment unrest among the diehards, he should have said nothing. The ball is now in the PM's court, the general public is concerned with the bacchanal and scandalous nature of the claims, but the implications of an AG under police investigation are more reaching than providing material for next year's calypso season; this will resonate nationally and internationally for years to come.
I fully expect to expect the sycophants to throw all kinds of old occurrences into the fray to somehow justify their position, but if for once they could look at the situation impartially they would see why he has no choice but to resign. This is an opportunity for the PM to throw off the mantle of banana republic and act on principles of transparency in the interest of the greater good.
It was thoroughly investigated by the judiciary and found to be unsubstantial. http://legacy.guardian.co.tt/archives/2 ... news4.htmlUML wrote:As I said before....former AG John Jeremie and Magistrate Sherman Mc Nicolls land deal scandal didnt get this attention and was swept under the carpet and nothing done if i remember correctly....do nothing is PNM style!
UML wrote:again I ask and no one can answer
Habit7 wrote:It is sad to see the character assassination the UNC supporters are engaging in to discredit Mr. West. The PP and Ramlogan hired West and never voiced any concern until now. Let Ramlogan be vindicated on his own merit, not on whether West or Griffith is PNM.UML wrote:David West hold on to that information like Rowley and Emailgate!!!!
He didn't hold on the info, MoNS knew, and is eager to testify. These allegations have come to light only a month after his witness statement was filed and proving he didn't accept the bribe.
Did Rowley select Mr West knowing that he was a witness on Rowley's behalf when selecting him for the post of PCA Chariman? Rowley and Ramlogan knew thus by extension the PM knew. In the words of the AG "I am not going to do your legal homework for you."
Did Mr West mislead the President, the PM and Opposition leader knowing that he was a witness on Rowley's behalf when he was selected for the post of PCA Chariman? Being a witness in civil trial between citizen Dr. Keith Rowley and citizen Anand Ramlogan does (edit: not) conflict with chairing the PCA. All he has to do is represent the truth when called on him by the court. Being a witness is not holding political office.
Mr West held high office under the PNM!!!!Director, Designate of the Financial Intelligence Unit
Ministry of Finance
March 2010 – September 2010 (7 months)Trinidad and Tobago
Ministry of the Attorney GeneralHead, Central Authority Unit
Ministry of the Attorney General
September 1999 – July 2008 (8 years 11 months)
Sept 1999 - Dec 2001 and May 2010 - Present the UNC was in power. So Mr. West held high office under the UNC first if my maths are right?
No wonder he intentional avoids media interviews, he fraid to answer DIRECT questions from the media!!! According to his statement yesterday he stayed silent as the AG said he was staying silent. When the AG talked, Mr West had a radio interview on 26th of Jan. Has the AG allow himself to be interviewed or is he still hiding in Cabildo House?
he should step down because he cannot be in that neutral, independent position and politicking and criticizing the government with his political biases!!! The last PCA head critiqued the govt too and she was a former UNC MP for Point a Pierre. Mr West still maintains his independence.
UML wrote:But it is a conflict of interest, because the man (Rowley) who agreeing to have him chosen is also depending on him for a witness statement? Rowley could have opposed, more so if he wasnt a PNMite.
Habit7 wrote:UML wrote:But it is a conflict of interest, because the man (Rowley) who agreeing to have him chosen is also depending on him for a witness statement? Rowley could have opposed, more so if he wasnt a PNMite.
Calling someone as a witness doesn't necessarily mean that they are taking a side. They are recounting what happened. This recount can work for or against the defendant Rowley.
Kamla and Rowley formerly appointed Jillian Lucky for PCA head. A known former UNC MP.
Stop trying to discredit West. Kamla and Ramlogan approved of him. Study why Griffith supports him and Cabinet wants to shut him up.
pugboy wrote:you guys giving west a bad rap just so ?
the man was a lawyer working the the dept handling extraditions and such
just like any lawyer working in dpp office
that has nothing to do with "lucrative positions"
the mere fact that he was in charge of handling ish/steve doesn't make him a pnm or against unc
The PCA position wasn't "tainted." The AG doesn't officially has power to appoint PCA head. The President already gave him the green light and the AG's appeal was just an attempt to offer something he didn't have.De Dragon wrote:pugboy wrote:you guys giving west a bad rap just so ?
the man was a lawyer working the the dept handling extraditions and such
just like any lawyer working in dpp office
that has nothing to do with "lucrative positions"
the mere fact that he was in charge of handling ish/steve doesn't make him a pnm or against unc
I guess the inquiry will see who is culpable. What I would like to see revealed is West's stance on that PCA position, meaning if he knew it was tainted, why accept it anyway? Could he not have informed the President of his concerns at that time?
Hyperion wrote:Why is it that every time someone adopts a position that does not align with that of the PP, they are immediately and automatically branded as PNM? That button is stuck on replay, it deliberately distracts from the issues at hand.
eliteauto wrote:
Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”
Users browsing this forum: Duane 3NE 2NR and 56 guests