No Dr. Rowley & Rfari

[- Rovin's car audio -]

plenty beatin up in here boi


from d time rowley face only come on tv i does switch channels 1 time ....

[hustla_ambition101]

I does do same when Kams rumfle face on......and the propaganda ads too

[UML]

The nonsensical argument is to believe that hanging convicted killers from ten years ago will make a huge dent in crime now when present killers don't care because the detection rate is abysmally low. The only way this would make sense is if you highly believe and have proof that most of these convicted killers are carrying out your present killings from inside prison themselves.

Maybe we should not hang them at all...what is the difference between 10 years and 5 years.

I does do same when Kams rumfle face on......and the propaganda ads too

Like yuh cah handle the performance of the ads.

The truth does really offend the conveniently blind!!

[UML]

Another defeat!!!

[De Dragon]

The nonsensical argument is to believe that hanging convicted killers from ten years ago will make a huge dent in crime now when present killers don't care because the detection rate is abysmally low. The only way this would make sense is if you highly believe and have proof that most of these convicted killers are carrying out your present killings from inside prison themselves.

What also emboldens criminals murderers is that they know that at present, they cannot be hanged. Also, your logic is flawed, since what you essentially are saying is to not hang already convicted persons because you believe that it will not make a difference. Why stop there though? Why not abolish all punishment? People steal, rob, rape, in spite of punishments prescribed for these things.

[Allergic2BunnyEars]

The nonsensical argument is to believe that hanging convicted killers from ten years ago will make a huge dent in crime now when present killers don't care because the detection rate is abysmally low. The only way this would make sense is if you highly believe and have proof that most of these convicted killers are carrying out your present killings from inside prison themselves.

What also emboldens criminals murderers is that they know that at present, they cannot be hanged. Also, your logic is flawed, since what you essentially are saying is to not hang already convicted persons because you believe that it will not make a difference. Why stop there though? Why not abolish all punishment? People steal, rob, rape, in spite of punishments prescribed for these things.

I think what emboldens anyone is the fact that you won't get caught. Fines and penalties increase for traffic violations and that doesn't reduce the level of law breaking. The only thing that truly causes a dent is being caught.

Note that I never said do not hang anyone. I said that hanging persons convicted of murder from ten years ago will have little if any effect on present crime. So no don't misinterpret what I am saying to try to argue to removing all punishment.

If persons see a police officer on the shoulder they don't take chances because they know they will get caught and charged/fined. A person thinking of committing murder is not thinking as far ahead as hanging. Why? Because he isn't even seeing police officers arresting guys for murder in the first place.

[UML]

The level of lies and deceit in the PNM is amazing. Only PNM sheep blinded by race can even consider to vote for such an oppressive party.

Al Rawi was on news last night questioning the AGs statement of a victory saying it was not a victory and the matter was not decided on, almost bordering on the credibility and neutrality of the judiciary; because he had to even mention that he was not questioning the judiciary.

Yet we are provided with this....

[De Dragon]

The nonsensical argument is to believe that hanging convicted killers from ten years ago will make a huge dent in crime now when present killers don't care because the detection rate is abysmally low. The only way this would make sense is if you highly believe and have proof that most of these convicted killers are carrying out your present killings from inside prison themselves.

What also emboldens criminals murderers is that they know that at present, they cannot be hanged. Also, your logic is flawed, since what you essentially are saying is to not hang already convicted persons because you believe that it will not make a difference. Why stop there though? Why not abolish all punishment? People steal, rob, rape, in spite of punishments prescribed for these things.

I think what emboldens anyone is the fact that you won't get caught. Fines and penalties increase for traffic violations and that doesn't reduce the level of law breaking. The only thing that truly causes a dent is being caught.

Note that I never said do not hang anyone. I said that hanging persons convicted of murder from ten years ago will have little if any effect on present crime. So no don't misinterpret what I am saying to try to argue to removing all punishment.

If persons see a police officer on the shoulder they don't take chances because they know they will get caught and charged/fined. A person thinking of committing murder is not thinking as far ahead as hanging. Why? Because he isn't even seeing police officers arresting guys for murder in the first place.

I am not misinterpreting anything, just pointing out that your logic is flawed. Anyone anti death penalty can point out that capital punishment doesn't lead to a reduction in any country, just as pro death penalty could show you it does for another country. What I am saying is that a consistent application of the death penalty is not only lawful, but worth pursuing ALONG with improved detection rates. How exactly do you know how a murderer thinks anyway? Have you done some type of survey among death row convicts? Has anyone?

[Allergic2BunnyEars]

The nonsensical argument is to believe that hanging convicted killers from ten years ago will make a huge dent in crime now when present killers don't care because the detection rate is abysmally low. The only way this would make sense is if you highly believe and have proof that most of these convicted killers are carrying out your present killings from inside prison themselves.

What also emboldens criminals murderers is that they know that at present, they cannot be hanged. Also, your logic is flawed, since what you essentially are saying is to not hang already convicted persons because you believe that it will not make a difference. Why stop there though? Why not abolish all punishment? People steal, rob, rape, in spite of punishments prescribed for these things.

I think what emboldens anyone is the fact that you won't get caught. Fines and penalties increase for traffic violations and that doesn't reduce the level of law breaking. The only thing that truly causes a dent is being caught.

Note that I never said do not hang anyone. I said that hanging persons convicted of murder from ten years ago will have little if any effect on present crime. So no don't misinterpret what I am saying to try to argue to removing all punishment.

If persons see a police officer on the shoulder they don't take chances because they know they will get caught and charged/fined. A person thinking of committing murder is not thinking as far ahead as hanging. Why? Because he isn't even seeing police officers arresting guys for murder in the first place.

I am not misinterpreting anything, just pointing out that your logic is flawed. Anyone anti death penalty can point out that capital punishment doesn't lead to a reduction in any country, just as pro death penalty could show you it does for another country. What I am saying is that a consistent application of the death penalty is not only lawful, but worth pursuing ALONG with improved detection rates. How exactly do you know how a murderer thinks anyway? Have you done some type of survey among death row convicts? Has anyone?

I say you misinterpret simply because you are saying I am anti capital punishment. You will not find that statement anywhere in my posts. In fact in the post you just quoted I stated, "Note that I never stated do not hang anyone." How you can interpret that line to mean I am anti capital punishment I am not sure.

Also at no point in your previous posts did you speak of doing both i.e. hanging and increasing detection rates.

[mrtrini45]

[zoom rader]

Mis-informed PNMITES will still support Rowley.

Rowley want ppl to trust him after this crap

[UML]

If you vote PP, I done with TT

Friday, January 16 2015

OPPOSITION People’s National Movement (PNM) General Election candidate for Mayaro Clarence Rambharat on Wednesday night told supporters if the country votes to keep the People’s Partnership (PP) in office, he will “wash my hands” of Trinidad and Tobago.

The meeting followed Opposition Leader Dr Keith Rowley’s second walkabout in the constituency currently held by UNC MP Winston ‘‘Gypsy’’ Peters. Rambharat told supporters he left his job at the Hong Kong and Shanghai Banking Corporation (HSBC) in Canada on May 20, to work on getting the Opposition back in power.

“I left my job in Canada. I haven’t worked since. My time has been dedicated to getting the PNM back into office. I am 8,000 miles away from my wife and kids. If we lose this election, I wash my hands of this country! If we lose, I will not have a Plan B for you...”

In an attempt to emphasise the crucialness of removing the PP, Rambharat said the Government has done a lousy job of running the country.

“The UNC is a relentless campaign machinery and a relentless mischief machinery...This Government will do anything.. We’ve got an obligation to recover every cent of money for our young people. If the stories are true about six houses and two $20 million houses, then we need to know and recover it,” Rambharat said.

Rambharat was approached by Rowley in December 2013, to join the PNM team. “In December 2013, Rowley approached me and said I would have his personal support.”

Rambharat said he feels comfortable in representing Mayaro in a PNM government and said no one can represent that constituency better than he. “As a candidate, I’m comfortable with what lies in front of me. No one can represent Mayaro better than me.

I won’t waste my time talking about the Government because air time expensive and I want to talk about me.

“Dr Rowley has endorsed our East Coast Renewal Project. Everytime Devant Maharaj stands up in the Senate and attacks me, I have to remind them of the 1992, tripartite report where Dr Rowley was able to bring together all elements of the Sugar Industry, wipe away Caroni’s billion dollar debt and give that company a fresh start. And not long after, Mr Panday came into Government and we know what happened,” Rambharat said.

“A PNM government will talk about agriculture, we have to talk about consumption. We have to talk about where you get your food. And when I sit in a PNM government, I am going to require that my Navet dasheen, my Mayaro fish and my Mayaro coconut water be on the plate of every government minister,” Rambharat said.

Rambharat admitted that winning the votes of Mayaro residents is difficult and he has a hard time especially when he comes into Poole. He urged the PNM brigade to work harder to ensure that in the end, the party succeeds in getting the 1,500 UNC voters in Poole to support him.

“When I get into Poole, I have problems. I see Diego Martin West, Pointe-a-Pierre and Tabaquite (referring to those present at the PNM meeting).

“But I have a more serious battle here. I’ve walked this constituency and people cuss meh.” He said once Mayaro goes to the PNM the party will win the general election.
http://www.newsday.co.tt/news/0,205608.html

VERY PATRIOTIC!!!


We see how sincere and that he does not have the country interest at heart since he can abandon ship so quickly and easily!!!


BUT THEN AGAIN...his entire family lives in Canada....so he eh business!!

Great job Dr Rowley

from fabricated pie-in-the-sky stories like Emailgate and NY Consulate racism scandals

to selecting a corrupt (cheque and secret scholarship scandals) and an unpatriotic foreigner for the upcoming elections!

[De Dragon]

The nonsensical argument is to believe that hanging convicted killers from ten years ago will make a huge dent in crime now when present killers don't care because the detection rate is abysmally low. The only way this would make sense is if you highly believe and have proof that most of these convicted killers are carrying out your present killings from inside prison themselves.

What also emboldens criminals murderers is that they know that at present, they cannot be hanged. Also, your logic is flawed, since what you essentially are saying is to not hang already convicted persons because you believe that it will not make a difference. Why stop there though? Why not abolish all punishment? People steal, rob, rape, in spite of punishments prescribed for these things.

I think what emboldens anyone is the fact that you won't get caught. Fines and penalties increase for traffic violations and that doesn't reduce the level of law breaking. The only thing that truly causes a dent is being caught.

Note that I never said do not hang anyone. I said that hanging persons convicted of murder from ten years ago will have little if any effect on present crime. So no don't misinterpret what I am saying to try to argue to removing all punishment.

If persons see a police officer on the shoulder they don't take chances because they know they will get caught and charged/fined. A person thinking of committing murder is not thinking as far ahead as hanging. Why? Because he isn't even seeing police officers arresting guys for murder in the first place.

I am not misinterpreting anything, just pointing out that your logic is flawed. Anyone anti death penalty can point out that capital punishment doesn't lead to a reduction in any country, just as pro death penalty could show you it does for another country. What I am saying is that a consistent application of the death penalty is not only lawful, but worth pursuing ALONG with improved detection rates. How exactly do you know how a murderer thinks anyway? Have you done some type of survey among death row convicts? Has anyone?

I say you misinterpret simply because you are saying I am anti capital punishment. You will not find that statement anywhere in my posts. In fact in the post you just quoted I stated, "Note that I never stated do not hang anyone." How you can interpret that line to mean I am anti capital punishment I am not sure.

Also at no point in your previous posts did you speak of doing both i.e. hanging and increasing detection rates.

By acknowledging that detection rates were dismal, I thought that that was understood.

[Allergic2BunnyEars]

Aite. Fair enough.

[UML]

How Rowley only avoiding the hangman issue so? All how he trying to twist it to get it off he back lol

[UML]

Cost "overruns" and unaccountable/nontransparent budgets....the modus operandi of the PNM

THA always complaining for more money...u see why

No opening date for Scarborough Library

Sunday, 09 November 2014 00:47
Written by Elizabeth Williams


No opening date for Scarborough Library
IT has been over ten years, and to date the People’s National Movement led Tobago House of Assembly is yet to deliver the Shaw Park Cultural Complex and the Scarborough Library.

The Secretary of the Division of Infrastructure and Public Utilities, Gary Melville says he remains hopeful that both projects will be handed over to the people of Tobago by the end of the year.

The Scarborough Library initial completion cost was $28 million. Today, this has risen to $86 million. Ten years and counting, the project is yet to be completed. “MTS (National Maintenance Training and Security Company Limited) has informed us that the main contractor on the project will hand over the building to the project managers MTS in the coming week,” states Melville. He says the fire suppression system and the information communication technology systems are to be ready by mid-November. “We at the Division of Infrastructure and Public Utilities have every confidence that while we cannot give the public a set date today for the opening of the library, that within an outside time of 6-8 weeks, that we would be able to have a final opening day within that particular period,” says Melville.

Meanwhile, the Shaw Park Cultural Complex, originally budgeted for $196 million, is now projected to cost a whopping $634 million, and Melville says that while there continues to be challenges, work on the project has accelerated. The main contractor is Yorke Structures Limited, with NIPDEC as project manager. “The Tobago House of Assembly is leaving no stone unturned, and resources and systems are being applied towards the completion of those works by the end of this year,” says Melville.
http://www.thetobagonews.com/news/item/ ... gh-library

Dr Rowley, your silence on these important issues is deafening!!!

[Epicurus]

The level of lies and deceit in the PP is amazing. Only PP sheep blinded by race can even consider to vote for such an oppressive party.



[/quote]


Seepersad steps down as judge in emailgate lawsuit
Story Created: Jan 22, 2015 at 1:30 AM ECT
Story Updated: Jan 22, 2015 at 1:30 AM ECT

High Court judge Justice Frank Seepersad has recused himself from the emailgate defamation
lawsuit brought by Attorney General Anand Ramlogan against Opposition Leader Dr Keith Rowley.
Seepersad’s recusal comes in the wake of the controversial failure of the High Court to notifiy Rowley’s attorneys of critical information relating to the filing of his defence.
The information involved the assignment of Seepersad to the case and his order that the filing of a defence had to be done by January 7, 2015.
This crucial information, how­ever, was only given unusually (in the view of many attorneys) to the Attorney General directly, as well as to his lawyer.
It was not passed on to Row­ley or his attorney, Faris Al-Rawi, and resulted in the failure of Rowley’s attorney to file a defence.
In the absence of the filing of a defence, a judgment in favour of the Attorney General was given by Seepersad.
Al-Rawi confirmed to the Express he had been informed by the court office on Tuesday, by e-mail, the judge had recused himself.
“Specifically, with respect to Justice Seepersad’s instructions not being carried out by his judical support officer, I am not surprised that he has recused himself.
“I certainly do not believe that Justice Seepersad had acted improperly in any manner in dealing with this case.... I respect the judge’s personal decision to recuse himself. I have practiced before this judge and know him to have a very keen and clear mind, which is a disappointment, in terms of his loss from the matter.
“I will await the court officer’s notification of the appointment of a new judge to deal with this matter,” said Al-Rawi.
And the judicial support officer who failed to notify the Rowley defence team has been de-rostered, removed from the list of judicial support officers.
This is the second recusal from this matter.
Justice Vasheist Kokaram, who was originally assigned, recused himself, without explanation.

[pete]

Sounds like a PNM orchestrated plot to stall for more time IMHO. Either way, the name of the judicial support officer should be published as they didn't do their work in this case.

[goalpost]

look ting

[Allergic2BunnyEars]

World price of oil was also artificially lowered by the PNM to starve the present government of funds thus not allowing them to perform their duties sufficiently in a plot to make the PP look bad and win the next general elections.

[shogun]

That rabbit hole though.

[UML]

^^^ you should check out the Achievement Thread or even better attend a PPG Meeting and see the great mix of citizens


did you quote me yet?

[Epicurus]

Thanks to the achievement thread I learnt that there are now box drains everywhere. This is great news indeed. You are confident that there is a great mix at the meetings because you present them with the food cards for their attendance yourself?

[goalpost]

^ lol

[hustla_ambition101]

Thanks to the achievement thread I learnt that there are now box drains everywhere. This is great news indeed. You are confident that there is a great mix at the meetings because you present them with the food cards for their attendance yourself?

[Picasso]

Thanks to the achievement thread I learnt that there are now box drains everywhere. This is great news indeed. You are confident that there is a great mix at the meetings because you present them with the food cards for their attendance yourself?

[Habit7]

Keith Rowley’s most dedicated advocates

By Roy Mitchell
Story Created: Jan 20, 2015 at 9:01 PM ECT
Story Updated: Jan 20, 2015 at 9:01 PM ECT

If ever there was any speculation as to the strategy the UNC plans to employ to fight off the predicted PNM lead in the upcoming general elections, the latest outburst by the erratic Attorney General has laid all doubts to rest.
It is blatantly clear that, as the election date draws closer than we think, (I predict that it will be April or May) the UNC has chosen the PNM political leader, Dr Keith Rowley, as their main target. The plan is to intensify their vicious attacks focused, connivingly and maliciously, on robbing him of his good name. The objective is to play on the minds of the electorate, to sway them away from accepting Dr Rowley as the only credible, genuine, trustworthy and respectable candidate for election as the next Prime Minister of Trinidad and Tobago.
It is a desperate ploy, based on the well-known strategy of warfare which aims directly at destroying the leader in the hope that, once the head is severed, the rest of the body is likely to fall into disarray, lose confidence and be vanquished.
The truth is that with no more Patrick Manning and no more Calder Hart to vilify, a vast vacuum has been created and the UNC is left with nothing more than Dr Rowley’s impeccable good name to dishonestly and disparagingly discredit and drag to the ground.

The irony is that Dr Rowley’s indefatigable stand against corruption, improprieties and mismanagement originated long before he became leader of the PNM. His was a defiant, virtually one-man fight against his own political leader when it seemed clear to him that the stature and integrity of the government and his party were at stake. A nobler cause is difficult to find. It is the same Dr Rowley who was cheered on by the delighted UNC opposition parliamentarians when he was openly and single-handedly taking issue with Mr Manning.

What has become of the desk-thumping and cheering, now that the boot is on the other foot?
It was arising out of this confrontation, righteously championed by Dr Rowley, that the UNC owes its status as the current Government, undeserved as it has turned out to be.
The latest comedy of the questionable Las Alturas Commission of Enquiry is just one other blank shot which, like those previously fired, will no doubt end up in thin air where it rightly belongs. And now comes the Attorney General’s irresponsible and dishonourable self-acclaim, littered with grave suspicions of a contrivance which has collaterally brought the integrity of our judiciary into question. Rest assured, more attempts to demonise Dr Rowley will continue to flow from these devious minds as the day of reckoning draws nigh.

Under Dr Rowley’s able and astute leadership, the PNM, which was so gleefully dismissed as a spent force, has been systematically restored to the realm of dominance and dynamism feared by all who dare to undermine the nation’s progress.
The AG’s latest show of empty bravado reaffirms that the PNM has always been and will forever remain the formidable bastion against those who clandestinely and clinically try to destroy the firm foundations and destabilise the structures of nationhood which the people of Trinidad and Tobago have so painstakingly built.
The eyes and ears of the people are wide open and their minds are alert to the deceit and deception which have been the indisputable cornerstone of the short but deplorable and despicable tenure of the current administration. With such a dismal and diabolical track record, the best they can aspire to is, like wolves in sheep clothing, to seek to devour the PNM’s leader.

They have chosen this course principally because of the powerful influence and positive attributes which Dr Rowley brings to bear as a no-nonsense man and an intellectually grounded and dedicated son of the soil. They dislike what this noble heritage means to the righteous in all its endearing manifestations, especially when they are forced to submit to Dr Rowley’s superior level of intelligence when juxtaposed with the best that they have to offer.
All right-thinking citizens must be in awe of the fact that, as the consciences of the UNC front line continue to needle them, never a word can they utter without blaspheming the name of the PNM.
So, while the party goes about conducting its affairs in an orderly, dignified, institutionally sound and democratic manner, the UNC backs this up by lending support in keeping the PNM brand alive, robust and well.
By default, they have become Dr Rowley’s and the PNM’s most ardent, committed and relentless advocates. Who could ask for more?


http://www.trinidadexpress.com/commenta ... 36581.html

[K74T]

Thanks to the achievement thread I learnt that there are now box drains everywhere. This is great news indeed. You are confident that there is a great mix at the meetings because you present them with the food cards for their attendance yourself?

WHOAGARD

[UML]

Simple things amuse simple minds


I hope this just as amusing




AG hits Rowley’s criminal probe talk

Attorney General Anand Ramlogan yesterday slammed Opposition Leader Dr Keith Rowley for his statements in the House of Representatives that there was a criminal probe “with respect to the perversion of justice” into the circumstances leading to the failure of the High Court to provide critical information to him and his attorney in the emailgate defamation lawsuit brought by Ramlogan against Rowley. Ramlogan in a statement yesterday said he would welcome any investigation by anyone, anytime, anywhere “The administrative errors that occurred are a source of personal grievance and a cause for concern. A litigant is entitled to rely on an order of the court. He is, and should not be, expected to go behind that order to question the internal administrative process within the Judiciary,” the Attorney General stated. However, Ramlogan chastised Rowley for misleading the Prime Minister, the Parliament and the nation on Thursday in Parliament. Yesterday the Police Service, speaking through it head of Corporate Communications Ellen Lewis, stated it wished to advise it is not at this time conducting any criminal investigation into an allegation of perversion of justice with respect to the Attorney General. Ramlogan said the Police Service had clarified there is no investigation into the alleged administrative error on the part of the Judiciary’s support staff. Ramlogan said the Chief Justice had already announced an internal enquiry and it is clearly prudent to allow this to be completed first. “Thereafter, if any wrongdoing is unearthed, it can be then referred to the DPP and police. Given the public concerns, the results of this enquiry should be made public by the Chief Justice,” he said. “In the meantime, we should be careful in what we say to avoid bringing the Judiciary into disrepute. Insinuations and accusations for political mileage could actually compromise and prejudice any investigation,” Ramlogan added. The Attorney General stated Rowley’s “hysterical behaviour and irresponsible question to the Prime Minister had the potential to bring the administrations of justice into disrepute”. “Such behaviour is reckless and unbecoming of a leader,” he added. “Given the seriousness of this matter, I hereby ask Dr Rowley and Al-Rawi whether they will agree to a joint application asking a newly assigned judge, Madam Justice Judith Jones, to deem this matter fit for urgent and early trial in the month of April 2015. “Dr Rowley and I should subject ourselves to cross-examination and give evidence under oath so that he can prove his claim with hard evidence and demonstrate that these were genuine e-mails which were sent from my account,” Ramlogan said. He said it was clear Rowley was not interested in an expeditious trial but wished to prolong this matter beyond the general election, so that it will hang like a sword of Damocles over our heads. “These delay tactics should not be tolerated,” he said. “Let justice be done according to law, and let the chips fall where they must. When the dust settles, one of us must resign and criminal prosecutions should follow. “Rowley will have to resign on account of the malicious falsehood and hoax he has perpetuated or I must resign for being part of a criminal conspiracy. I know there is no truth in ‘Emailgate’. It is a fabrication and political concoction. “I will therefore happily tender my resignation if Dr Rowley proves his outrageous claim. I likewise however, ask that he publicly commit to a similar course should his claims be rejected and found wanting,” the Attorney General stated. “An urgent and early trial with a resignation to follow—that’s my proposal—the ball is now in your court Dr Rowley,” Ramlogan concluded.
http://www.trinidadexpress.com/news/AG- ... &smobile=y


Checkmate!!

[16 cycles]

Callout...

Interesting