Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
De Dragon wrote:Your car is at fault because you failed to ensure that the way was clear before entering the major road. Did police take reports/come to the scene?
shake d livin wake d dead wrote:call alexander and marlan and they go tell yuh
redmanjp wrote:no insurance don't mean he CAUSED the accident though he cud be charged with driving without insurance
sizzla89 wrote: Who is really at fault in this situation?
sizzla89 wrote:So ok he didn't cause the accident...Its ok to drive on the nations roads without insurance and get away with it then.
sizzla89 wrote:What if lives were lost under these circumstances?...If most of you guys are correct in your suggestions then the law needs to be reviewed in these particular instances
sizzla89 wrote:Just for information purposes the gentleman actually accepted liability and stated that he was looking away at a stockpile when it occurred...but that's not what I am getting at.
De Dragon wrote:Your car is at fault because you failed to ensure that the way was clear before entering the major road. Did police take reports/come to the scene?
sizzla89 wrote:shake d livin wake d dead wrote:call alexander and marlan and they go tell yuh
I may do just that.
sizzla89 wrote:redmanjp wrote:no insurance don't mean he CAUSED the accident though he cud be charged with driving without insurance
So ok he didn't cause the accident...Its ok to drive on the nations roads without insurance and get away with it then...the purpose of insurance is being grossly neglected here. What if lives were lost under these circumstances?...If most of you guys are correct in your suggestions then the law needs to be reviewed in these particular instances
Just for information purposes the gentleman actually accepted liability and stated that he was looking away at a stockpile when it occurred...but that's not what I am getting at.
orangefox wrote:sizzla89 wrote:redmanjp wrote:no insurance don't mean he CAUSED the accident though he cud be charged with driving without insurance
So ok he didn't cause the accident...Its ok to drive on the nations roads without insurance and get away with it then...the purpose of insurance is being grossly neglected here. What if lives were lost under these circumstances?...If most of you guys are correct in your suggestions then the law needs to be reviewed in these particular instances
Just for information purposes the gentleman actually accepted liability and stated that he was looking away at a stockpile when it occurred...but that's not what I am getting at.
Hoss you have the answer right in front of you ! Do not get into complications, like a review of Laws.
If the other driver accepted liability move on quickly and inform YOUR insurance company.
orangefox wrote:If the other driver accepted liability move on quickly and inform YOUR insurance company.
88sins wrote:orangefox wrote:If the other driver accepted liability move on quickly and inform YOUR insurance company.
stop tellin ppl sheit.
The insurance will revert to the police investigator, that will tell them their client's vehicle was the causal factor in the collision, & he still wrong.
when all yuh accustomed to drivin is cockroach wit baygon yuh should jus hush yuh blasted mout whe ppl talkin bout d road & cars
orangefox wrote:^^ Even if Popo say you wrong. You could fight it by your logic that you were on the major
road and the other driver accepted liability since he was not paying attention. These are called
mitigating circumstances.
88 Hammer-boy papi above does not know the Law.
sizzla89 wrote:redmanjp wrote:no insurance don't mean he CAUSED the accident though he cud be charged with driving without insurance
So ok he didn't cause the accident...Its ok to drive on the nations roads without insurance and get away with it then...the purpose of insurance is being grossly neglected here. What if lives were lost under these circumstances?...If most of you guys are correct in your suggestions then the law needs to be reviewed in these particular instances
Just for information purposes the gentleman actually accepted liability and stated that he was looking away at a stockpile when it occurred...but that's not what I am getting at.
orangefox wrote:^^ Even if Popo say you wrong. You could fight it by your logic that you were on the major road
88sins wrote:orangefox wrote:^^ Even if Popo say you wrong. You could fight it by your logic that you were on the major road
I could see by this post, that if you weren't so stupid, you would be absolutely nothing
Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”
Users browsing this forum: pugboy and 299 guests