Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
pugboy wrote:He going to be continuing to hunt down the regular holdup bandits etc or will he be going after big fish?
Skuld wrote:pugboy wrote:He going to be continuing to hunt down the regular holdup bandits etc or will he be going after big fish?
In the 4+ years Ian has been on national television, name one big fish he went after.
hustla_ambition101 wrote:so the kuunt is on......
Sabriel wrote:hustla_ambition101 wrote:so the kuunt is on......
Full of win!!..![]()
![]()
pioneer wrote:TTPS don't even know the law wrt to fireworks and explosives.
sonygoup wrote:Lol bro i living Arima i doh think might even appear police starting to ignore ur
Because some as simple as tell nergos no fireworks they cant come for
And i doh get the government the only talk bout permit or what ever to use firework the day before -_- like who gonna really apply for it too wait to days for it -_-
spanish wrote:sonygoup wrote:Lol bro i living Arima i doh think might even appear police starting to ignore ur
Because some as simple as tell nergos no fireworks they cant come for
And i doh get the government the only talk bout permit or what ever to use firework the day before -_- like who gonna really apply for it too wait to days for it -_-
Huh? *scratches head*
thelem wrote:dsstt wrote:https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?v=10153672391220144
SMH NO SEATBELT AND DRIVING WHILST ON UR CELL PHONE.... STUPES
And that's what you focus on right???
Not the fact that he assisted in the surrender of a criminal. Smh.
Crime rampant because people feel that they can get away with it, same goes for driving while on the phone and murder....thelem wrote:Morpheus wrote:thelem wrote:dsstt wrote:https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?v=10153672391220144
SMH NO SEATBELT AND DRIVING WHILST ON UR CELL PHONE.... STUPES
And that's what you focus on right???
Not the fact that he assisted in the surrender of a criminal. Smh.
So because he assisted in the capture of a "alleged" criminal it's ok?
Like you have court clothes. Tell me where in my post did you see I said it was "okay" or "acceptable"??
I asked if that's the main focus?? Especially at a time where the country is rampant with major crime.
And if you watch the video, you'd also see that it's no longer alleged if there was admittance of the crime by the suspect and also clear video evidence. Making him a confirmed suspect in the burglary.
thelem wrote:Morpheus wrote:thelem wrote:dsstt wrote:https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?v=10153672391220144
SMH NO SEATBELT AND DRIVING WHILST ON UR CELL PHONE.... STUPES
And that's what you focus on right???
Not the fact that he assisted in the surrender of a criminal. Smh.
So because he assisted in the capture of a "alleged" criminal it's ok?
Like you have court clothes. Tell me where in my post did you see I said it was "okay" or "acceptable"??
I asked if that's the main focus?? Especially at a time where the country is rampant with major crime.
And if you watch the video, you'd also see that it's no longer alleged if there was admittance of the crime by the suspect and also clear video evidence. Making him a confirmed suspect in the burglary.
thelem wrote:Morpheus wrote:thelem wrote:Morpheus wrote:thelem wrote:dsstt wrote:https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?v=10153672391220144
SMH NO SEATBELT AND DRIVING WHILST ON UR CELL PHONE.... STUPES
And that's what you focus on right???
Not the fact that he assisted in the surrender of a criminal. Smh.
So because he assisted in the capture of a "alleged" criminal it's ok?
Like you have court clothes. Tell me where in my post did you see I said it was "okay" or "acceptable"??
I asked if that's the main focus?? Especially at a time where the country is rampant with major crime.
And if you watch the video, you'd also see that it's no longer alleged if there was admittance of the crime by the suspect and also clear video evidence. Making him a confirmed suspect in the burglary.
Ok let me rephrase for you to understand.....Also re-read your initial response.
So because he eh comment on the arrest etc that mean IA breach was his main focus?
I'm starting to think you're the one not understanding or you're probably over-thinking my post.
thelem wrote:dsstt wrote:guilty of stealing - law enforced - suspect now a CRIMINAL police there in a matter of minutes
likewise
driving without seatbelt and also on your cellphone - SUSPECTED? ITS NOT A CRIME BCUZ HE DIDNT STEAL OR KILL BUT ISNT IT AN OFFENSIVE ACT? - LAW NOT ENFORCED!
ideally whos above the law system
Anyways. My point wasn't to justify Ian's actions. It was to question why it was the focus? Is it because of the irony that he going for a suspected law breaker and he himself is breaking it?
Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 24 guests