Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
Duane 3NE 2NR wrote:^ very interesting indeed! good find
except that if you want to use the above as proof then you need to follow through with all the other fossil data that shows that those puddles of mud evolved into single celled amoeba and then on to multi-cellular animals that evolved into the animals that roam the earth today, including humans.
unless of course you want to continue the popular practice in here of selective and convenient argument and proof.
Duane 3NE 2NR wrote:AdamB, Dr. Zakir Naik is very proficient in the Bible and Christian theology. He has recited long passages from memory and understands the Bible better than a lot of, if not most, Christians. However he is not Christian.
Stuff wrote:God is real. I mean what kind of question is that?
how do you think life came about? it didn't just happen by itself.
hence god is real we all are his children. what the world has come to today isnt his fault
its ours it may not be your fault but its sheit like money ,power, greed an material objects all lead us away from god.
my advice , dont believe most of what the bible says.
Humes wrote:AdamB wrote:Humes,
You are confusing yourself with an erroneous definition, possibly non-sensical. A scholar is knowledgeable of his religion.
Partner, we talking about the real world here. Real language, real definitions. Not personal interpretations of terms.
A religious scholar is not necessarily an adherent of the religion or religions he specialises in.
MG Man wrote:so who CAN it be understood by then?
crossdrilled wrote:Duane 3NE 2NR wrote:AdamB, Dr. Zakir Naik is very proficient in the Bible and Christian theology. He has recited long passages from memory and understands the Bible better than a lot of, if not most, Christians. However he is not Christian.
Memorization does not mean understanding. He bashes the bible and vedas constantly and vhelmently.
Duane 3NE 2NR wrote:AdamB, Dr. Zakir Naik is very proficient in the Bible and Christian theology. He has recited long passages from memory and understands the Bible better than a lot of, if not most, Christians. However he is not Christian.
Duane 3NE 2NR wrote:are you suggesting that the Qur'an can only be understood by Muslims? There are different levels of understanding and the deducing of laws, hidden meanings and benefits. The scholars know what we (the laymen) know not.AdamB wrote: It is our book, who else do you expect to fully understand it?
The Quran cannot be understood by just anyone!!
Everyone can understand the basic (scratch the surface) meanings from the translations but the Quran is an Arabic Quran, the language itself adds to the meaning or brings out the full meaning.can you prove that?stickman wrote:Also, the Quran is not perfect. It is a flawed book just like the others. Why? Because it was written by men just like you and me, it's not the speech of God.
16 cycles wrote:too much emphasis on which religion is 'right'........
many cases on tuner where people need help in one form or the other....why not mobilize and support those in need (an inter-religious effort) ???
AdamB wrote:I will venture to ask a question here: Is there any other religious book that is without doubt in terms of the source having evidence of it being revealed or written? I mean in terms of objective evidence / documented historical facts. That is not in dispute as to being changed or corrupted by man over time. That you can pick up ANY TWO COPIES OF MILLIONS IN PRINT and they are IDENTICAL, WORD FOR WORD, LETTER FOR LETTER!!!
I asked that earlier and was told that "not by works do we achieve salvation"16 cycles wrote:too much emphasis on which religion is 'right'........
many cases on tuner where people need help in one form or the other....why not mobilize and support those in need (an inter-religious effort) ???
Bizzare wrote:"inter-religious" is a term that contradicts itself and religious folks indulging in inter-religious activities only seek to make a hypocrite of themselves
MG Man wrote:Bizzare wrote:"inter-religious" is a term that contradicts itself and religious folks indulging in inter-religious activities only seek to make a hypocrite of themselves
most religions teach intolerance, which in turn leads to hate
suffering leads to the dark sideHumes wrote:MG Man wrote:Bizzare wrote:"inter-religious" is a term that contradicts itself and religious folks indulging in inter-religious activities only seek to make a hypocrite of themselves
most religions teach intolerance, which in turn leads to hate
Hate leads to suffering.
Duane 3NE 2NR wrote:suffering leads to the dark sideHumes wrote:MG Man wrote:Bizzare wrote:"inter-religious" is a term that contradicts itself and religious folks indulging in inter-religious activities only seek to make a hypocrite of themselves
most religions teach intolerance, which in turn leads to hate
Hate leads to suffering.
chasemeifyoucan wrote: Evolution is not a religion as yourself and other ignorant (of what science is) posters believe.
I did, where are you going with that?chasemeifyoucan wrote: I implore you to read about what a scientific process is before you continue to make yourself look not so intelligent.
Flex030 wrote:I rather live believing that there is a God and die finding out there isn't, Than to live not believing in God and die finding out that there is a God. (Think about that for a while)
Duane 3NE 2NR wrote:We have no way of verifying the claims of NDEs either, other than their own account.
Duane 3NE 2NR wrote:any book on biology and evolution will explain it to you.
Duane 3NE 2NR wrote:I think you are terrified by the thought of being descended from apes or a puddle of mud.
bluefete wrote:Was it the "great" atheist Richard Dawkins who agreed with Aristotle's theory that human life came from mud via abiogenesis (the evolution of life from mud)???
Does he support the creationist perspective while simultaneously denying it????
chasemeifyoucan wrote:Duane 3NE 2NR wrote:suffering leads to the dark sideHumes wrote:MG Man wrote:Bizzare wrote:"inter-religious" is a term that contradicts itself and religious folks indulging in inter-religious activities only seek to make a hypocrite of themselves
most religions teach intolerance, which in turn leads to hate
Hate leads to suffering.
![]()
I asked that earlier and was told that "not by works do we achieve salvation"[/quote]Duane 3NE 2NR wrote:16 cycles wrote:too much emphasis on which religion is 'right'........
many cases on tuner where people need help in one form or the other....why not mobilize and support those in need (an inter-religious effort) ???
Duane 3NE 2NR wrote:I asked that earlier and was told that "not by works do we achieve salvation"16 cycles wrote:too much emphasis on which religion is 'right'........
many cases on tuner where people need help in one form or the other....why not mobilize and support those in need (an inter-religious effort) ???
Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 30 guests