Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
5onDfloor wrote:Two weeks ago a memo was sent to head of divisions to cease all raids. Strangely enough our last week our honorable PM said the Police has asked for the SOE to be extended.![]()
![]()
talk bout deceit.
Habit7 wrote:TRAE wrote:the country was going through a path that would cause more much more than we were seeing, the SoE serves it purpose and the curfew should be kept whether or not the SoE is still in progress.
When I hear ppl like yourself make comments like that it makes me feel sorry for how ppl have lost some of their sanity because of the perceived danger of crime. Ppl are now willing to give up their freedom of movement and privacy for the virtual safety of a police state.
The country was gripped with a murder rate that was considered high in comparison to its past but consistent with the rate of the region. Last year the murder rate had decreased by 7% and this year was seeing a 15% decrease. The PM announced that due to some near and present crisis we have to instate a SoE (Sandy later said it would have made 1990 look like a garden party). The first action as one might perceived to be would be to squash this threat…we saw a raid on Nelson St. to nab alleged gang members. We saw other arrests and drugs and arms seizures (mostly lead by tip offs). We are now hearing that the reason for the SoE is the deal with the criminal element in the country and the curfew is to assist in this.
Now some of you could be comfortable with this but I am not. We don’t have the official monetary figure for how much this SoE is impacting our economy but we all hope that it would be worth it. Whether or not you are a limer, doubles man, Gyro man, bar/club/casino owner, night shift worker or whatever nocturnal proprietor this SoE will affect you. Just as water finds it own level, one sector of the economy suffering flows into other sectors. And in these recessionary times can we further afford to stagnate the economy that is crying out for action?
If we can’t walk and whistle, that is, deal with crime and build our economy we won’t have either. If we can’t deal with crime without killing the economy then how about we enslave Barbados, free labour without the hassle. But seriously wake up, we are the only country to ever use an SoE to deal with crime, and so far the most successful convictions are curfew breakers. Whatever gains we might get it is at a terrible loss in my view.
rollingstock wrote:5onDfloor wrote:Two weeks ago a memo was sent to head of divisions to cease all raids. Strangely enough our last week our honorable PM said the Police has asked for the SOE to be extended.![]()
![]()
talk bout deceit.
What? De hell you get that from?
5onDfloor wrote:dont talk common sense you will be branded a bandit and part of the PNM Cult!
rollingstock wrote:5onDfloor wrote:Two weeks ago a memo was sent to head of divisions to cease all raids. Strangely enough our last week our honorable PM said the Police has asked for the SOE to be extended.![]()
![]()
talk bout deceit.
What? De hell you get that from?
Pusangani wrote:Habit7 wrote:TRAE wrote:the country was going through a path that would cause more much more than we were seeing, the SoE serves it purpose and the curfew should be kept whether or not the SoE is still in progress.
When I hear ppl like yourself make comments like that it makes me feel sorry for how ppl have lost some of their sanity because of the perceived danger of crime. Ppl are now willing to give up their freedom of movement and privacy for the virtual safety of a police state.
The country was gripped with a murder rate that was considered high in comparison to its past but consistent with the rate of the region. Last year the murder rate had decreased by 7% and this year was seeing a 15% decrease. The PM announced that due to some near and present crisis we have to instate a SoE (Sandy later said it would have made 1990 look like a garden party). The first action as one might perceived to be would be to squash this threat…we saw a raid on Nelson St. to nab alleged gang members. We saw other arrests and drugs and arms seizures (mostly lead by tip offs). We are now hearing that the reason for the SoE is the deal with the criminal element in the country and the curfew is to assist in this.
Now some of you could be comfortable with this but I am not. We don’t have the official monetary figure for how much this SoE is impacting our economy but we all hope that it would be worth it. Whether or not you are a limer, doubles man, Gyro man, bar/club/casino owner, night shift worker or whatever nocturnal proprietor this SoE will affect you. Just as water finds it own level, one sector of the economy suffering flows into other sectors. And in these recessionary times can we further afford to stagnate the economy that is crying out for action?
If we can’t walk and whistle, that is, deal with crime and build our economy we won’t have either. If we can’t deal with crime without killing the economy then how about we enslave Barbados, free labour without the hassle. But seriously wake up, we are the only country to ever use an SoE to deal with crime, and so far the most successful convictions are curfew breakers. Whatever gains we might get it is at a terrible loss in my view.
Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a little Temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety and will lose both - Benjamin Franklin
Here's my personal opinion:
I'm with you 100% on this post, some people are so blinded by their gov't and its fearmongering and propaganda
Look at all the old rusty non-functioning guns and ammo they paraded in the press so try and flaunt their success in the earlies lol
They don't have the answers to the crime problem, they're desperate to look like they're doing something.
The problem is poverty and corruption, those are both constants in our society, and once we have them, crime will be a constant.
If crime is a constant, then what will they do when the SOE ultimately ends? the only way to justify that logic is by living in a constant SOE/Curfew if they want to have the kind of crime stats that we currently have.
They flip flopped on the reason for it, making it up as they go along, and their sheeple believe it all.
Those that speak out against it are labelled PNM supporters or criminals or sympathizers with criminals. As if one is unable to be FOR liberty and AGAINST crime at the same time.
redmanjp wrote:i think d old man who get hold for cocaine in El Socorro is d same man who my mom buy manure from 2 months ago oui
Pusangani wrote:Habit7 wrote:TRAE wrote:the country was going through a path that would cause more much more than we were seeing, the SoE serves it purpose and the curfew should be kept whether or not the SoE is still in progress.
When I hear ppl like yourself make comments like that it makes me feel sorry for how ppl have lost some of their sanity because of the perceived danger of crime. Ppl are now willing to give up their freedom of movement and privacy for the virtual safety of a police state.
The country was gripped with a murder rate that was considered high in comparison to its past but consistent with the rate of the region. Last year the murder rate had decreased by 7% and this year was seeing a 15% decrease. The PM announced that due to some near and present crisis we have to instate a SoE (Sandy later said it would have made 1990 look like a garden party). The first action as one might perceived to be would be to squash this threat…we saw a raid on Nelson St. to nab alleged gang members. We saw other arrests and drugs and arms seizures (mostly lead by tip offs). We are now hearing that the reason for the SoE is the deal with the criminal element in the country and the curfew is to assist in this.
Now some of you could be comfortable with this but I am not. We don’t have the official monetary figure for how much this SoE is impacting our economy but we all hope that it would be worth it. Whether or not you are a limer, doubles man, Gyro man, bar/club/casino owner, night shift worker or whatever nocturnal proprietor this SoE will affect you. Just as water finds it own level, one sector of the economy suffering flows into other sectors. And in these recessionary times can we further afford to stagnate the economy that is crying out for action?
If we can’t walk and whistle, that is, deal with crime and build our economy we won’t have either. If we can’t deal with crime without killing the economy then how about we enslave Barbados, free labour without the hassle. But seriously wake up, we are the only country to ever use an SoE to deal with crime, and so far the most successful convictions are curfew breakers. Whatever gains we might get it is at a terrible loss in my view.
Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a little Temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety and will lose both - Benjamin Franklin
Here's my personal opinion:
I'm with you 100% on this post, some people are so blinded by their gov't and its fearmongering and propaganda
Look at all the old rusty non-functioning guns and ammo they paraded in the press so try and flaunt their success in the earlies lol
They don't have the answers to the crime problem, they're desperate to look like they're doing something.
The problem is poverty and corruption, those are both constants in our society, and once we have them, crime will be a constant.
If crime is a constant, then what will they do when the SOE ultimately ends? the only way to justify that logic is by living in a constant SOE/Curfew if they want to have the kind of crime stats that we currently have.
They flip flopped on the reason for it, making it up as they go along, and their sheeple believe it all.
Those that speak out against it are labelled PNM supporters or criminals or sympathizers with criminals. As if one is unable to be FOR liberty and AGAINST crime at the same time.
homeboy wrote:Pusangani wrote:Habit7 wrote:TRAE wrote:the country was going through a path that would cause more much more than we were seeing, the SoE serves it purpose and the curfew should be kept whether or not the SoE is still in progress.
When I hear ppl like yourself make comments like that it makes me feel sorry for how ppl have lost some of their sanity because of the perceived danger of crime. Ppl are now willing to give up their freedom of movement and privacy for the virtual safety of a police state.
The country was gripped with a murder rate that was considered high in comparison to its past but consistent with the rate of the region. Last year the murder rate had decreased by 7% and this year was seeing a 15% decrease. The PM announced that due to some near and present crisis we have to instate a SoE (Sandy later said it would have made 1990 look like a garden party). The first action as one might perceived to be would be to squash this threat…we saw a raid on Nelson St. to nab alleged gang members. We saw other arrests and drugs and arms seizures (mostly lead by tip offs). We are now hearing that the reason for the SoE is the deal with the criminal element in the country and the curfew is to assist in this.
Now some of you could be comfortable with this but I am not. We don’t have the official monetary figure for how much this SoE is impacting our economy but we all hope that it would be worth it. Whether or not you are a limer, doubles man, Gyro man, bar/club/casino owner, night shift worker or whatever nocturnal proprietor this SoE will affect you. Just as water finds it own level, one sector of the economy suffering flows into other sectors. And in these recessionary times can we further afford to stagnate the economy that is crying out for action?
If we can’t walk and whistle, that is, deal with crime and build our economy we won’t have either. If we can’t deal with crime without killing the economy then how about we enslave Barbados, free labour without the hassle. But seriously wake up, we are the only country to ever use an SoE to deal with crime, and so far the most successful convictions are curfew breakers. Whatever gains we might get it is at a terrible loss in my view.
Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a little Temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety and will lose both - Benjamin Franklin
Here's my personal opinion:
I'm with you 100% on this post, some people are so blinded by their gov't and its fearmongering and propaganda
Look at all the old rusty non-functioning guns and ammo they paraded in the press so try and flaunt their success in the earlies lol
They don't have the answers to the crime problem, they're desperate to look like they're doing something.
The problem is poverty and corruption, those are both constants in our society, and once we have them, crime will be a constant.
If crime is a constant, then what will they do when the SOE ultimately ends? the only way to justify that logic is by living in a constant SOE/Curfew if they want to have the kind of crime stats that we currently have.
They flip flopped on the reason for it, making it up as they go along, and their sheeple believe it all.
Those that speak out against it are labelled PNM supporters or criminals or sympathizers with criminals. As if one is unable to be FOR liberty and AGAINST crime at the same time.
When both your turn reach i hope you can handle it! Giving up freedom from 11pm to 4am? Those hours are given up my the minority of law abiding people, who do you all know that likes to be out after these hours?
Poverty will always be an issue, my neighbor got a good car to work and pay 100 dollars a day until the car becomes his, this was not good enough to work PH and make the money to fit in with the 4 and 5 movies he likes to buy and watch on a daily basis.
Now he lost the car because he couldn't pay for it due to working taxi was to much pressure, he has 5 kids all smaller than age 12 and he say he need help he is to "poor" to maintain his family........Yes the government needs to help out people like this and give them all they want to get out off poverty...
Now he lost the car because he couldn't pay for it due to working taxi was to much pressure, he has 5 kids all smaller than age 12 and he say he need help he is to "poor" to maintain his family........Yes the government needs to help out people like this and give them all they want to get out off poverty...
hustla_ambition101 wrote:Now he lost the car because he couldn't pay for it due to working taxi was to much pressure, he has 5 kids all smaller than age 12 and he say he need help he is to "poor" to maintain his family........Yes the government needs to help out people like this and give them all they want to get out off poverty...
If only they could have neutered him. Why do people make children they cant afford to mind and then want to be angry with the State. Let him go learn a trade instead of looking for d easy way out. If you so concerned you should take a couple of his kids and and mind them
K74T wrote:why did he decide to have all these kids if he knew he couldn't provide for them?
Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”
Users browsing this forum: VexXx Dogg and 54 guests