Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
mr. mindz wrote:
it was the second accident in Claxton Bay on Sat. Night...
the reckless survived, while the innocent were murdered.
lostallos101 wrote:Mr. Mindz i agree with everything written there.....always said the speed limit was too slow and should be increased also but once done, police should be busy stopping anyone who goes over because then it would be just clear recklessness. The three lane thing also a good idea.
but in the end its the citizen's mentality we need to changed....so much lives being lost. Its sooo sad now.
also, the barriers....if we do stop someone from crossing the median, what will happen if someone hits it but comes back onto the road, wouldnt that endanger the innocent ppl coming up behind????
MG Man wrote:mr. mindz wrote:
it was the second accident in Claxton Bay on Sat. Night...
the reckless survived, while the innocent were murdered.
details?
lostallos101 wrote:also, the barriers....if we do stop someone from crossing the median, what will happen if someone hits it but comes back onto the road, wouldnt that endanger the innocent ppl coming up behind????
M_2NR wrote:...when the highways were designed, the evolution of transport and the exponential increase in traffic was not seriously taken into account.
Rory Phoulorie wrote:M_2NR wrote:...when the highways were designed, the evolution of transport and the exponential increase in traffic was not seriously taken into account.
What messed up the traffic volume predictions was the introduction of foreign used vehicles in the 1990s.
Your statement above is a bit unfair to the planners who, when the last National Transportation Study was done more than 20 years ago, could not have predicted that Uncle Basdeo would have let the introduction of foreign used vehicle spiral out of control, giving every Tom, Rampartap and Harrilal access to mobile weapons.
M_2NR wrote:Rory Phoulorie wrote:M_2NR wrote:...when the highways were designed, the evolution of transport and the exponential increase in traffic was not seriously taken into account.
What messed up the traffic volume predictions was the introduction of foreign used vehicles in the 1990s.
Your statement above is a bit unfair to the planners who, when the last National Transportation Study was done more than 20 years ago, could not have predicted that Uncle Basdeo would have let the introduction of foreign used vehicle spiral out of control, giving every Tom, Rampartap and Harrilal access to mobile weapons.
ahh good point![]()
thanks for clearing that up.
With respect to the volume of vehicles on our roads... this could easily be corrected by taking vehicles that have crossed a specific age limit off the roads.... and lifting the time limit for vehicles that are imported (japan). This way, we assist in cleaning up the country from hazards on the roads.. and create a better standard of living and transportation for citizens... which will inturn help in taking us to developed country status....
bigchief3679 wrote:With respect to the volume of vehicles on our roads... this could easily be corrected by taking vehicles that have crossed a specific age limit off the roads.... and lifting the time limit for vehicles that are imported (japan). This way, we assist in cleaning up the country from hazards on the roads.. and create a better standard of living and transportation for citizens... which will inturn help in taking us to developed country status....
These older vehicles or hazards that you speak of, how many of them have been involved in those recent high speed, extremely fatal accidents?
MG Man wrote:bigchief3679 wrote:With respect to the volume of vehicles on our roads... this could easily be corrected by taking vehicles that have crossed a specific age limit off the roads.... and lifting the time limit for vehicles that are imported (japan). This way, we assist in cleaning up the country from hazards on the roads.. and create a better standard of living and transportation for citizens... which will inturn help in taking us to developed country status....
These older vehicles or hazards that you speak of, how many of them have been involved in those recent high speed, extremely fatal accidents?
I fed up arguing that point
never mind all the 'new' vehicles rollin on smooth tyres, cut springs etc
- Defensive driving should be a requirement to acquire a licenseTK! wrote:very good article. agree on all points.
i think we need:
-better enforcement. - Major point
-radar guns - The police actually have radar guns saw them using it but the gasparillo flyover some time ago (about 3yrs). They actually caught some ppl but never saw them use it again
-better driving school rules/laws. this one year ting nuh wuking. neither is the "pay for a license ting"
Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”
Users browsing this forum: death365, Google Adsense [Bot] and 48 guests