Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
crossdrilled wrote:rollingstock wrote:crossdrilled wrote:rollingstock wrote:Sometimes promiscuity in persons that young is the result of prior sexual molestation.
Laugh it up.
So true... or just taking pattern after mammy.
Wouldn't be surprising if mammy was the recipient of sexual molestation too, having a kid at 16.
Everyone will laugh at the little girl and bawl she's a little hoe, but actions like these are a reflection of deep rooted psychological trauma that manifests itself it open defiance of rules, the taking of risks and generally taking action that would appear outlandish and inappropriate for the age group.
There's nothing to skin about, my heart actually goes out to that child.
Even the little boys are victims... they just don't know it yet. They might turn out to be pedo's themselves as this exposure might affect their develpoment.
s@int wrote:I believe that these are the people that should deal with issues of this nature, and try to get to the root cause, and hopefully try and break the circle,just imagine that there are more of these cases out there!
mamoo_pagal wrote:s@int wrote:I believe that these are the people that should deal with issues of this nature, and try to get to the root cause, and hopefully try and break the circle,just imagine that there are more of these cases out there!
yes they should be but of the hundreds of students in a school with more than 50% having serious issues they are swamped with students and their issues. It is impossible to deal with all.......the socal services sector in this country needs to be more aggressive and support schools/children more.......
but then again is sweet T n T
The girl reported to her 28-year-old mother that....
TRAE wrote:this is bs- how dey go charge the fellas for that? dat is chupidness- dem youths go be our newest criminals in a few years now
rollingstock wrote:TRAE wrote:this is bs- how dey go charge the fellas for that? dat is chupidness- dem youths go be our newest criminals in a few years now
The law of our land state that a female under teh age of 14 CANNOT give consent, having sex with her is an automatic offence even if she says yes. It is to protect underage persons from sexual predators.
rollingstock wrote:TRAE wrote:this is bs- how dey go charge the fellas for that? dat is chupidness- dem youths go be our newest criminals in a few years now
The law of our land state that a female under teh age of 14 CANNOT give consent, having sex with her is an automatic offence even if she says yes. It is to protect underage persons from sexual predators.
TRAE wrote:rollingstock wrote:TRAE wrote:this is bs- how dey go charge the fellas for that? dat is chupidness- dem youths go be our newest criminals in a few years now
The law of our land state that a female under teh age of 14 CANNOT give consent, having sex with her is an automatic offence even if she says yes. It is to protect underage persons from sexual predators.
even if the kids are underaged?
honda hoe wrote::shock:
Humes wrote:TRAE wrote:rollingstock wrote:TRAE wrote:this is bs- how dey go charge the fellas for that? dat is chupidness- dem youths go be our newest criminals in a few years now
The law of our land state that a female under teh age of 14 CANNOT give consent, having sex with her is an automatic offence even if she says yes. It is to protect underage persons from sexual predators.
even if the kids are underaged?
I was confused about that law at first too, but a lawyer explained that very often, underage girls who become pregnant defend their adult lovers from prosecution by asking underage boys to claim responsibility.
This law acts as a deterrent to that. It's selectively enforced. In reality, it's highly unlikely that any of those boys will get in any trouble.
Humes wrote:TRAE wrote:rollingstock wrote:TRAE wrote:this is bs- how dey go charge the fellas for that? dat is chupidness- dem youths go be our newest criminals in a few years now
The law of our land state that a female under teh age of 14 CANNOT give consent, having sex with her is an automatic offence even if she says yes. It is to protect underage persons from sexual predators.
even if the kids are underaged?
I was confused about that law at first too, but a lawyer explained that very often, underage girls who become pregnant defend their adult lovers from prosecution by asking underage boys to claim responsibility.
This law acts as a deterrent to that. It's selectively enforced. In reality, it's highly unlikely that any of those boys will get in any trouble.
bushwakka wrote:^^ENT
also....under the laws of the country, it is impossible for a woman to rape a boy/man.....thats cuz the law says for intercourse to take place, the boy/man has to be aroused (stiffie).....which implies consent
TRAE wrote:Humes wrote:TRAE wrote:rollingstock wrote:TRAE wrote:this is bs- how dey go charge the fellas for that? dat is chupidness- dem youths go be our newest criminals in a few years now
The law of our land state that a female under teh age of 14 CANNOT give consent, having sex with her is an automatic offence even if she says yes. It is to protect underage persons from sexual predators.
even if the kids are underaged?
I was confused about that law at first too, but a lawyer explained that very often, underage girls who become pregnant defend their adult lovers from prosecution by asking underage boys to claim responsibility.
This law acts as a deterrent to that. It's selectively enforced. In reality, it's highly unlikely that any of those boys will get in any trouble.
Anyways all dem oman bawling equal rights!!! equal rights!!! and lil fellas getting the bad end
bushwakka wrote:^^ENT
also....under the laws of the country, it is impossible for a woman to rape a boy/man.....thats cuz the law says for intercourse to take place, the boy/man has to be aroused (stiffie).....which implies consent
rollingstock wrote:Y'all serious, that part of teh law is there for a reason.
For instance say a big hard back man approaches a little child and induce her to let him put his piggy in her for the return of sweets and a toy and she agrees, then that man cannot be charged because she gave consent. The law just states that if you are under the age of 14 you are still considered a child and as a result cannot be given the responsibility to make your own decision wrt sex. In effect telling all big hard back men to stay the fcuk away from little girls.
sharkman121 wrote:pioneer wrote:ya'll will be amazed at the levels of prostitution that goes on in schools
prestige schools ftw...if yuh chile didn't make de cut to get in...blame yuhself
wha make u think this doh go on in "prestige" schools?
lol u eh know d half of it yes
Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 73 guests