Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
AbstractPoetic wrote:cornfused wrote:What's the issue here? , he is speaking on what he sees and lives.
NO, he is speaking to advocate the same lifestyle of cultural polygamy that has shown a history of more bad than good -- fatherless children and broken homes, unwanted pregnancies, spread of STDs/STIs, broken hearts and emotional pain, single mothers, and the list goes on.
Is this the type of role model we want for the youth?
pugboy wrote:you making blanket statements here,
are you aware of how much money and work lara does for charity ?
pugboy wrote:how come you not putting any blame on the women ?
I dont think he put a gun to their heads and raped them
AGENT RORO wrote:AbstractPoetic wrote:cornfused wrote:What's the issue here? , he is speaking on what he sees and lives.
NO, he is speaking to advocate the same lifestyle of cultural polygamy that has shown a history of more bad than good -- fatherless children and broken homes, unwanted pregnancies, spread of STDs/STIs, broken hearts and emotional pain, single mothers, and the list goes on.
Is this the type of role model we want for the youth?
So let me get this straight, You make a comment / statement such as "To call any woman a whore, irrespective of HER decision to share her commodity whenever she sees fit, is quite offensive" (which seems to indicate that you have no issue with a woman being promiscuous) However, you have an issue with a man being simply being honest with not just the public but with himself about what he thinks is best for him or what he thinks works in his life? And some of you women always complain about men not being honest? [/b]
eliteauto wrote:Neither he nor Lara are obligated too
pugboy wrote:we dont live in a perfect world, there will also be both sides to every situation
you cant just lay blame on the male role model and ignore the fact that the females more than willing
pugboy wrote:so where are the female role models to teach females not to fall into that lifestyle of going after high status men ?
AbstractPoetic wrote:eliteauto wrote:Neither he nor Lara are obligated too
No one said they were, however, given their notoriety and status they become examples and role models by default. Their actions and decisions will have an influence on those who look up to these men.
In the case of Yorke his actions coupled with his advice will be treated as a rule of thumb for many, after all, it is Dwight Yorkeâ„¢ approved.
wagonrunner wrote:AbstractPoetic wrote:eliteauto wrote:Neither he nor Lara are obligated too
No one said they were, however, given their notoriety and status they become examples and role models by default. Their actions and decisions will have an influence on those who look up to these men.
In the case of Yorke his actions coupled with his advice will be treated as a rule of thumb for many, after all, it is Dwight Yorkeâ„¢ approved.
aaaah, now i get it.
you believe the masses can't make a decision on their own, and therefore need their actions to be decided by someone else for them.
When a man chooses to bull em all, he made that choice. And was not following the instruction of someone else.
It is completely natural, and the reason it is frowned upon is the real sheep (followers) opted to follow someone else's thoughts and ideals (society).
wagonrunner wrote:AbstractPoetic wrote:eliteauto wrote:Neither he nor Lara are obligated too
No one said they were, however, given their notoriety and status they become examples and role models by default. Their actions and decisions will have an influence on those who look up to these men.
In the case of Yorke his actions coupled with his advice will be treated as a rule of thumb for many, after all, it is Dwight Yorkeâ„¢ approved.
aaaah, now i get it.
you believe the masses can't make a decision on their own, and therefore need their actions to be decided by someone else for them.
When a man chooses to bull em all, he made that choice. And was not following the instruction of someone else.
It is completely natural, and the reason it is frowned upon is the real sheep (followers) opted to follow someone else's thoughts and ideals (society).
AbstractPoetic wrote:wagonrunner wrote:AbstractPoetic wrote:
Yorke is encouraging young men and adult men to treat women as nothing more than dime pieces at their disposal, her sole purpose being to satisfy a man's sexual craving. This applies not only to a potential dime piece but his mother, grandmother, great-grandmother and where applicable, any future girl children.
That is exactly what yall are...women have made themselves this because of their wants and desires for material things by running down high status men. York is just stating the facts.
ABA Trading LTD wrote:Yorke's decisions and ideals do not fit which AbstractPoetic's so...she has a problem with them, and wants all of to know that.
Okay we know that now Abstract.
good work
You just worried your "significant other", is taking yorke's advice and blazing out everything in the "work place"
It ever occur to you that such a "highly paid" individual, only lives as a pauper with you? And the majority of his money is spent on the outside women?
AGENT RORO wrote:AbstractPoetic wrote:cornfused wrote:What's the issue here? , he is speaking on what he sees and lives.
NO, he is speaking to advocate the same lifestyle of cultural polygamy that has shown a history of more bad than good -- fatherless children and broken homes, unwanted pregnancies, spread of STDs/STIs, broken hearts and emotional pain, single mothers, and the list goes on.
Is this the type of role model we want for the youth?
So let me get this straight, You make a comment / statement such as "To call any woman a whore, irrespective of HER decision to share her commodity whenever she sees fit, is quite offensive" (which seems to indicate that you have no issue with a woman being promiscuous) However, you have an issue with a man being simply being honest with not just the public but with himself about what he thinks is best for him or what he thinks works in his life? And some of you women always complain about men not being honest? [/b]
eliteauto wrote:exactly, these guys never asked to be role models, society thrust that upon them they have no obligation to be anything but themselves, furthermore their behavior is nothing new, the only shift in the dynamic is the over exposure that media brings now as opposed to times past
cornfused wrote:Infidelity is usually between two parties , so I for one am very fed up with media and reports putting it up as solely the man who undertakes this , ironically as i am typing this and my neighbour is playing James's 1966 hit "It's a mans world " , really James what happened , external sex is the new most socially irresponsible crime ,
i remember Charles Barkley saying he did not ask to be put on a pedestal and i guess neither did Yorke, but as they are popular we want to judge and put our value systems on them
AbstractPoetic wrote:AGENT RORO wrote:AbstractPoetic wrote:cornfused wrote:What's the issue here? , he is speaking on what he sees and lives.
NO, he is speaking to advocate the same lifestyle of cultural polygamy that has shown a history of more bad than good -- fatherless children and broken homes, unwanted pregnancies, spread of STDs/STIs, broken hearts and emotional pain, single mothers, and the list goes on.
Is this the type of role model we want for the youth?
So let me get this straight, You make a comment / statement such as "To call any woman a whore, irrespective of HER decision to share her commodity whenever she sees fit, is quite offensive" (which seems to indicate that you have no issue with a woman being promiscuous) However, you have an issue with a man being simply being honest with not just the public but with himself about what he thinks is best for him or what he thinks works in his life? And some of you women always complain about men not being honest? [/b]
INCORRECT.
Is a man considered a whore if he is promiscuous? Is he judged with the same level of partiality? Is he?
Yes. If it doesn't happen in your circle then *shrugs* Tuff
It's the connotation of "whore" that *I* and many other women have a gripe with. Why is a woman who decides to use many men for the sole purpose of her sexual satisfaction immediately labeled a whore?
Well I definitely can't call her Mother Theresa now can I? And for your notification I took the liberty to provide a link so that you can reacquaint yourself with the meaning of whore.
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/whore
Furthermore, A man can't carry a child for 9 months nor can they give birth (duh) so women need to stop with this crap about men do it so I can to because we are NOT equal in that aspect. That is exactly why you have endless women ending up with un-wanted pregnancies because they feel what good for the goose good for the gander.
And a man who does the same is someone most/all men should aspire to? Such a man is lauded, encouraged and revered by those around him, some folks even aspiring to be like him.
I can only speak for myself here but WRT to my friends TRUST ME if they are in relationships and I see them straying I DO make it my duty as a real friend to pull them up.
And a woman? She's a "whore", "slut", "stink", "dutty", "skettel" and the list of negative connotations go on.
Until you and society can start judging both men and women the same with respect to their sexuality, your argument is null.
AbstractPoetic wrote:eliteauto wrote:exactly, these guys never asked to be role models, society thrust that upon them they have no obligation to be anything but themselves, furthermore their behavior is nothing new, the only shift in the dynamic is the over exposure that media brings now as opposed to times past
That's to assume they were "themselves" before they became a somebody.
That said, I wonder if you and others can say the same of Wendy Fitzwilliams or Danah Alleyne seeing how "they have no obligation to be anything but themselves", of course.
On this premise Fitzwilliams should not be viewed as a mother out of wedlock and Danah Alleyne a promiscuous slut/whore of a teenager. After all, what standards are they to be judged by other than their own?
Ah yes, how can I forget: they were just being "themselves"...in the limelight...for others to see and model.
AbstractPoetic wrote:
NO, he is speaking to advocate the same lifestyle of cultural polygamy that has shown a history of more bad than good
AGENT RORO wrote:Abstractpoetic wrote:Is a man considered a whore if he is promiscuous? Is he judged with the same level of partiality? Is he?
Yes. If it doesn't happen in your circle then *shrugs* Tuff
AGENT RORO wrote:Well I definitely can't call her Mother Theresa now can I? And for your notification I took the liberty to provide a link so that you can reacquaint yourself with the meaning of whore.
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/whore
AGENT RORO wrote:Furthermore, A man can't carry a child for 9 months nor can they give birth (duh) so women need to stop with this crap about men do it so I can to because we are NOT equal in that aspect. That is exactly why you have endless women ending up with un-wanted pregnancies because they feel what good for the goose good for the gander.
AGENT RORO wrote:I can only speak for myself here but WRT to my friends TRUST ME if they are in relationships and I see them straying I DO make it my duty as a real friend to pull them up.
AGENT RORO wrote:Have a good day.
eliteauto wrote:AbstractPoetic wrote:eliteauto wrote:exactly, these guys never asked to be role models, society thrust that upon them they have no obligation to be anything but themselves, furthermore their behavior is nothing new, the only shift in the dynamic is the over exposure that media brings now as opposed to times past
That's to assume they were "themselves" before they became a somebody.
That said, I wonder if you and others can say the same of Wendy Fitzwilliams or Danah Alleyne seeing how "they have no obligation to be anything but themselves", of course.
On this premise Fitzwilliams should not be viewed as a mother out of wedlock and Danah Alleyne a promiscuous slut/whore of a teenager. After all, what standards are they to be judged by other than their own?
Ah yes, how can I forget: they were just being "themselves"...in the limelight...for others to see and model.
you really are naive aren't you? I really see no point to continuing to contribute to this banter, respond as you wish, clearly you North Americans see things differently.
Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 34 guests