Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
Sky wrote:Dirty Face wrote:
Quote from occupant of one of the other cars, within minutes after the crash, still in shock, can't barely breathe, to my ex on the telephone "OMG I cant believe this is happening, we were going WAY TOO FAST" end quote.
Firing a small shot, trying to not fall into the trap I swear. Yuh making it hard.Zas wrote:So basically you have "facts" even though you weren't there as an actual witness. You real good boy.
You ever hear about the coup and the taking of the Red House? You know what went on? How you know, you was there ent? Or maybe they never invade the Red House, you actually see them do it? Maybe it was a conspiracy....
10km/h is way too fast if people die. Especially to someone who was JUST involved in something like that, because it's relative.![]()
And wtf is this about coup. Don't use logic to 1back nah. You have facts? Spill it, instead of trolling. And the autopsy said the driver didn't have any big level of alcohol in his system? What you talking about post alcohol consumption?
gundelero wrote:
4. if SPK was the leader of the convoy and claimed he was maintaining a safe drive as the leader, why was there so much space between him and the 2nd and 3rd drivers, resulting in the 3rd driver to be "turned on" to overtake and hence come in to 2nd post. if he had maintained a safe driving distance, there would not be any room for the overtaking.it.
SPK1983 wrote:I was the one leading, if I had crossed 80km/h I was going fast, anyone who knows me would know I generally don't play to drive hard for the most part because I know of the kinds of drives that does go on in that area. I highly doubt the others behind me would have been going any faster....
SPK1983 wrote:Look, everybody please chill.
I am going to put this is no uncertain terms.
I AM NOT BLAMING ANYONE FOR THIS!!!
If you all wish to speculate and whatnot, fine...but please note, I had not looked to cast blame on the Hilux driver with everything I said, because we simply can't say based on what we saw. Saying who's right or wrong is not going to bring them back.
Keep doing what you all want, I have to say my final goodbyes to them today and tomorrow.
Rikki, you're up first.
RawVoltage wrote:Official Vocabulary no longer refers to car crashes as accidents: They are now called collisions. Because "accident" implies there's nobody to blame.
R.I.P ......you have gone on to a better place.
Dirty Face wrote:4) Corolla hit on passenger side worst? How is this possible, if I lose control at the last second and swerve into the path of the hilux chances are that the driver side get the first and hardest impact. So what happened? Rickson start to overtake from before the stretch then on comes the HILUX, when this happens Rickson and the middle car and IN LINE with each other so he cant pull left or else hell run THEM off the road and being a good friend doh want to do that, he cant go straight or he go hit the HILUX so he pulls right hoping the hilux go pass between him and he partner car, unfortunately for him, HILUX driver sees him, realise HE CANT PULL right or run into middle car, he cant stay straight or run into rickson so obvious choice he must pull to HIS LEFT to avoid the crash, so he pull left and rickson pull right, if either one of them had stayed their course all would have been well but (game theory) they both pick their best option and end up hitting each other still, this is why the passenger side of the corolla is worst and not the driver side is the outside of the hilux inside.
wagonrunner wrote:question.
the wagon came to rest on the eastern or western side of the road?
using this to get my bearings..........
http://wikimapia.org/#lat=10.558022&lon ... 13&l=0&m=b
Dirty Face wrote:
I not blaming anybody, even rickson, his inexperience combined with the "lime" atmosphere made him make a bad decision, I make bad decisions tons of times, he is just unfortunate that his cost him his and others lives rather than with me who get away to learn a lesson hell never learn.
God rest your souls guys, say hi to my brother for me.
Dirty Face wrote:Allyuh could say Beetham or whatever yes I have no sympathy for SPK or SAX, this type of behaviour is what killed my brother and has now taken the lives of other innocents; and will continue to do so.
To add insult to injury allyuh come on the board looking for sympathy and defending yourselves when there really is no defence.What happen is tragic I certainly agree but dont come on the forum trying to take front and then when tuners expose yuh is an argument, I did warn allyuh tuners are and inquistive bunch.SPK is a blatant lier and Sax covering with him just so allyuh doh look like it was allyuh irresponsible behaviour that caused this, which it flippin was.
Cid. never once did i mention the Hilux driver, like you cant read or what.
Sky, if I drive down the road and hit someone at 30Km and they die, no way is my first reaction going to be I was going to fast, doh be an ass.
I say I eh go do a step b step but gundelero have it covered.
Let me help a bit, seeing it all out now :
All the following are JUST USING WHATS SAID IN THIS TOPIC NOT ANY FACTS I KNOW
1) Convoy style, no wildness right? then no one overtakes each other PERIOD, the fact that one man overtake another mean action happening
2)Natural male reaction when you with yuh partners and one of them overtake you is to ....?? Overtake them back straight talk, which is exactly what Rickson was trying to do when he hit the HILUX
Now this quote i go deal withSPK1983 wrote:I was the one leading, if I had crossed 80km/h I was going fast, anyone who knows me would know I generally don't play to drive hard for the most part because I know of the kinds of drives that does go on in that area. I highly doubt the others behind me would have been going any faster....
So lets look at 2 things
3)A) Why yuh say "highly doubt" them was going faster? ent if you going 80 and you in front they HAVE to be going below 80? Why yuh didnt just saysomething like "No way they couldve been going over ... " etc??
3)B) So lets picture this
1) SPK (I presume you're Anil) in front, he say he going 80km or less
2) Rickson in middle he going say 70Km or less because remember he have to be going slow enough to leave a gap that could fit a car between him and the first car. Now remember you tryin to make me believe that he voluntarily going about 70 on a stretch at 1 AM eh...
3)Last car overtakes Rickson for no real reason at a speed somewhere between 75 and 85 KM or else he woulda overtake lead car too.
I get that right? that is what allyuh trying to make big people believe? na man and all this happening below 80 Km??
Now the facts:
1) Call quote which I mentioned earlier " OMG we were going WAY TOO FAST"
2) Marvin leaves one car to go into Rickson car jus so, no why would a grown man leave one car to go into another to be in the backseat and hug up a fella? Is not like a girl was there, jus so? and all of allyuh going the same place to boot? na man. FACT: Marvin, the proclaimed, "team leader" the "responsible one" leaves and goes into rickson car prior to the accident because he deemed rickson to be the most sober and the other driver to be drunk. full stop.
3)FACT : eyewitness who allyuh pass STATE that allyuh was blazing the trail, I guess they lying too ent?
4) Corolla hit on passenger side worst? How is this possible, if I lose control at the last second and swerve into the path of the hilux chances are that the driver side get the first and hardest impact. So what happened? Rickson start to overtake from before the stretch then on comes the HILUX, when this happens Rickson and the middle car and IN LINE with each other so he cant pull left or else hell run THEM off the road and being a good friend doh want to do that, he cant go straight or he go hit the HILUX so he pulls right hoping the hilux go pass between him and he partner car, unfortunately for him, HILUX driver sees him, realise HE CANT PULL right or run into middle car, he cant stay straight or run into rickson so obvious choice he must pull to HIS LEFT to avoid the crash, so he pull left and rickson pull right, if either one of them had stayed their course all would have been well but (game theory) they both pick their best option and end up hitting each other still, this is why the passenger side of the corolla is worst and not the driver side is the outside of the hilux inside.
Now they saying the eh know nobody eh see, but they know they was speeding, they know they was drinking and they know that one of those cars was in line with rickson so they could look right and see
So to SPK and SAX and whoever else Ill repeat
Trinituner is not the place to bamboozle people,tuners eh easy and trinidad too small.
AND :
120 and up eh safe if yuh inexperienced, maybe not at all
drinking and driving is not an option
lying to cover is not an option
learning to accept fault and learn a lesson is certainly an option
I not blaming anybody, even rickson, his inexperience combined with the "lime" atmosphere made him make a bad decision, I make bad decisions tons of times, he is just unfortunate that his cost him his and others lives rather than with me who get away to learn a lesson hell never learn.
God rest your souls guys, say hi to my brother for me.
Dirty Face wrote:SPK is a blatant lier
Sky wrote:2. What you said above was confirmed by family of the deceased. So you're right. BUT you had no right attacking Anil here. He never implied anything or blamed anyone. And he's grieving right now. He just said what he knew. That's bad taste.
SPK1983 wrote:Now one of the things that starting to really upset me is that I'm hearing talk about we were drag racing before the accident. That is just ridiculous to say the least!
Yeah, a rental Corolla wagon that does struggle to even get past 100km/h, a stock Wingroad and a stock AD (with some engine issues), are gonna be drag-racing at 80-90mph on that area....*steups*...and yet that's the kind of talk that is coming up.
I was the one leading, if I had crossed 80km/h I was going fast, anyone who knows me would know I generally don't play to drive hard for the most part because I know of the kinds of drives that does go on in that area. I highly doubt the others behind me would have been going any faster....
SPK1983 wrote:The fact there were no brake marks, meant that whoever it is drift, drift at the last second such that neither side had any decent chance to react. Either both were hugging the centre of the road or one vehicle swerve into the other at the last sec...but still, you'd expect some tire marks on the road at least.
I really dunno, and I don't want to play the blame game, it won't bring back my brothers-in-arms.
Dirty Face wrote:SPK1983 wrote:At this point, I don't think I'll be saying anything further in this thread.
Not to trivialise your pain, because regardless of who is at fault and what happened etc no speculation can bring back these lives; but this statement is a good idea especially when you're not being 100% truthful. Tuners are an inquisitive bunch and when youve peaked their interest they wont stop and knowing what I know silence is your best option. My Ex was supposed to make this lime and thankfully at the very last minute she declined, who knows which car she would have been in. I hope you can recover from the mental anguish, I lost my brother this way so I know its tough, and more importantly I hope youve learnt your lesson Sir. Godspeed.
SPK1983 wrote:I will say one more thing, as to why i wish to remain silent: Questions are being asked which I can't give definitive answers for while in that state of shock. I'm tired of having to try to explain what happened, only for the next person to assume we were all drag racing, we were all drunk etc, because it's so easy to categorise and make assumptions.
The phrase comes to mind: "Assumption is the mother of all f***ups."
The autopsy report we got from the driver of the vehicle, categorically stated that there were no significant levels of alcohol in his body at the time of his death.but this statement is a good idea especially when you're not being 100% truthful.
With everything I've said, to come back to imply that I'm not being truthful as to what happened? I will put it very simply and bluntly...
FCUK YOU!
Statements like that are why I refuse to say anything further!
gundelero wrote:this thread has really grown since my last remark. i only read dirty face's analysis below my last statement way up. when i get time, i'll read more. dirty face, u and i can start a private investigation business man.
anyway, the latest i've heard....(from an officer).
1. the occupants in the car were intoxicated
2. they were speeding
3. none were wearing any seats belts (i confirm wagon r's statement)
4. if de driver survived, he would have been charged for manslaughter of his three friends, which he was supposed to be dear to him
and to reiterate what dirty face is saying, tuner is not a place to come to make others feel sorry for u, about your loss. remember, there is always someone out there smarter and more brilliant than you are.
yes, it was sad, but u were de one who was leading the convoy. think about that. from the looks of things, your experience on the road could be questioned as well. in a sense, u were responsible for the entire convoy as the leader. but you failed in keeping the team together, causing horse play with the 2nd and 3rd car. also the driver of the other car who overtook the deceased should accept responsibilty for his immature actions on the roadway.
anyway, the latest i've heard....(from an officer).
1. the occupants in the car were intoxicated
2. they were speeding
3. none were wearing any seats belts (i confirm wagon r's statement)
4. if de driver survived, he would have been charged for manslaughter of his three friends, which he was supposed to be dear to him
Fuzz Master wrote:ive seen too many crashes and dispatched units to many a bad instances. dirty yuh spot on and call it like it is. driving is a privilege and is a responsibility to u, ur passengers and to everyone else around u.
RIP and be safe on the roads.
SR wrote:Fuzz Master wrote:ive seen too many crashes and dispatched units to many a bad instances. dirty yuh spot on and call it like it is. driving is a privilege and is a responsibility to u, ur passengers and to everyone else around u.
RIP and be safe on the roads.
fuzz boy them fellas eh realise that this is still an automotive website and some members have more experience on the road than others hence they will call it as they see it based on information given
it has nothing to do with lack of respect to those who died
its just based on the facts posted
all accounts lead to lack of experience
Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”
Users browsing this forum: death365, Duane 3NE 2NR and 39 guests