Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
Not a matter of sufferers its a question of not allowing people to easily take advantage of youj.o.e wrote:I thought it already had a sufferer thread ?
PariaMan wrote:Not a matter of sufferers its a question of not allowing people to easily take advantage of youj.o.e wrote:I thought it already had a sufferer thread ?
j.o.e wrote:I thought it already had a sufferer thread ?
MaxPower wrote:Trinis gonna be paying this tax normal.
Beat up only last so long in this country, just like how gas prices raise and card still selling like rain.
Unfortunately, the voices of those who really feel the pain will go unheard.
redmanjp wrote:Question - if u live in a HDC house which is not permitted to be rented out - then shouldn't the ARV be $0 ? and thus no tax is payable?
redmanjp wrote:Question - if u live in a HDC house which is not permitted to be rented out - then shouldn't the ARV be $0 ? and thus no tax is payable?
Joe has a PNM mindset and typically does not care about citizens. Once he's good does not care about the small manshake d livin wake d dead wrote:j.o.e wrote:I thought it already had a sufferer thread ?
So being concerned about paying something that may/not benefit you is called being a sufferer?
You are fortunate to pay for 4 properties, what about those who barely getting by? What about all the other increases that coming this year ? Finance minister give $200 increase only to take it back, guess thats sufferer too.
Dbu, the true sufferers would show up soon...ud see them on tv
Yes and they live in the USAlphaMan wrote:redmanjp wrote:Question - if u live in a HDC house which is not permitted to be rented out - then shouldn't the ARV be $0 ? and thus no tax is payable?
I know plenty people who renting out there HDC Homes..
Kickstart wrote:Yes and they live in the USAlphaMan wrote:redmanjp wrote:Question - if u live in a HDC house which is not permitted to be rented out - then shouldn't the ARV be $0 ? and thus no tax is payable?
I know plenty people who renting out there HDC Homes..
88sins wrote:redmanjp wrote:Question - if u live in a HDC house which is not permitted to be rented out - then shouldn't the ARV be $0 ? and thus no tax is payable?
Nice try, but, the tax will be levied based on what that home could be rented for, even though the landlord is HDC.
Bruh, in the act, it states, essentially, any property on or above land, on or under water, will attract a property tax liability, even if you have a mortgage/lease.
So, it doh matter where it is, who own it, it's condition, or any other contractual or non-contractual agreement or situation, Mr. John/Jane Public gonna have to come up out them pockets, and everybody unofficial name is either John or Jane Public
Nice synopsis.paid_influencer wrote:the tax designed to cover everybody, even down to squatters living in a shack. go watch parliament channel, the MoF say he intend to collect property tax from squatters. He will survey their shack to see the rental value of the shack.
i donno how much revenue he intend to collect from squatters. if you going to be real, this is more about dispossessing poor and vulnerable people than it is about revenue.
88sins wrote:Who here really feels this property tax is about the state "earning revenue"?
This has nothing to do with "earning revenue". It's really about the subjugation of the entire population.
PariaMan wrote:I do not think it's subjugation
It's just an unfeeling out of touch government who is more interested in balancing the books rather than the plight of poor people
Exhibit 1.
They eh riot yet so I can raise the price again
Coalpot usage
Eating macaroni pie
Traveling from Sangre Grande to POS to buy doubles
adnj wrote:paid_influencer wrote:the tax designed to cover everybody, even down to squatters living in a shack. go watch parliament channel, the MoF say he intend to collect property tax from squatters. He will survey their shack to see the rental value of the shack.
i donno how much revenue he intend to collect from squatters. if you going to be real, this is more about dispossessing poor and vulnerable people than it is about revenue.In section 7, the Commissioner of Valuations has the discretion to record the annual rental value of land at $18,000.00 if after reviewing a return he is of the opinion that the annual rental value of the land is below $18,000.00.
VexXx Dogg wrote:
A couple hundo a month is hardly oppressive. I want property tax as much as I’d like a sledge to my ballsack, but subjugation is a far stretch.
PariaMan wrote:I do not think it's subjugation
It's just an unfeeling out of touch government who is more interested in balancing the books rather than the plight of poor people
88sins wrote:You kno who else to live to pay tax on stuff, just because they had something worth something, no matter how they ketchin they nenen? The peasants under the monarchy, the subjects of the royalty back in the day.
The history of all hitherto existing society(2) is the history of class struggles.
Freeman and slave, patrician and plebeian, lord and serf, guild-master(3) and journeyman, in a word, oppressor and oppressed, stood in constant opposition to one another, carried on an uninterrupted, now hidden, now open fight, a fight that each time ended, either in a revolutionary reconstitution of society at large, or in the common ruin of the contending classes.
In the earlier epochs of history, we find almost everywhere a complicated arrangement of society into various orders, a manifold gradation of social rank. In ancient Rome we have patricians, knights, plebeians, slaves; in the Middle Ages, feudal lords, vassals, guild-masters, journeymen, apprentices, serfs; in almost all of these classes, again, subordinate gradations.
The modern bourgeois society that has sprouted from the ruins of feudal society has not done away with class antagonisms. It has but established new classes, new conditions of oppression, new forms of struggle in place of the old ones.
Our epoch, the epoch of the bourgeoisie, possesses, however, this distinct feature: it has simplified class antagonisms. Society as a whole is more and more splitting up into two great hostile camps, into two great classes directly facing each other — Bourgeoisie and Proletariat.
88sins wrote:VexXx Dogg wrote:
A couple hundo a month is hardly oppressive. I want property tax as much as I’d like a sledge to my ballsack, but subjugation is a far stretch.PariaMan wrote:I do not think it's subjugation
It's just an unfeeling out of touch government who is more interested in balancing the books rather than the plight of poor people
Ok, gtk, now tell me something.
Do you believe that you actually own something, if what you think you own because you legally bought and paid for it, and literally ANYTHING else you possess, can be taken away from you if you don't pay an entity whatever sum it demands, when that demand is based solely and entirely on the simple fact that you own the item you paid for, and absolutely no other reason?
Edit
You kno who else to live to pay tax on stuff, just because they had something worth something, no matter how they ketchin they nenen? The peasants under the monarchy, the subjects of the royalty back in the day.
AlphaMan wrote:If you didn't submit your valuation before to the deadline then you had to pay a fine and submit it anyways so people just submitted it.
They accepted that it was impossible to avoid.
Aunty kams and her legal team did brilliant in stalling the collection of these taxes thus far.
Had it not been for her we would have been paying taxes since 2015.
Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”
Users browsing this forum: Google Adsense [Bot] and 19 guests