Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
PariaMan wrote:People in the PSA and Teachers can go when they reach 33 and 1/3 with there non NIB pension. They receive their NIB at 60
So I suppose the same will hold if they raise the NIB pension age to 65
People will be able to retire before but just not get their NIB
However, we will have and see what the final proposals will be
timothymcdavid wrote:What happens to those employees whose companies have a 60yr retirement age? Do they not benefit from pension till they reach 65?
Good on u 88.88sins wrote:timothymcdavid wrote:What happens to those employees whose companies have a 60yr retirement age? Do they not benefit from pension till they reach 65?
Short answer-when the new retirement age kicks in, no
They MUST continue to work AND PAY NIS until they hit 65, unless they were smart enough to put things in place to retire at 60 regardless.
Me, I retiring at 55, because I can afford to. I see no sense in waking my old 60+ year old arse off my bed early o'clock in d morning, to fight up in traffic to go to a job/business, and another fight up to go home in the evening, and would prefer to still have some vinegar left in my blood and be physically able to do things and enjoy myself for as long as possible during retirement. Beat d bush, go hiking, take an early morning swim on the beach, play with the pets and maybe grandkids, plant a small garden, bubble a pot with the boys, live the good life on easy mode is what I mean.
Trini are chicken SĤits they have no belly to protest. They sit back and take abuse after abuse.paid_influencer wrote:i been thinking about dis thing where they want workers to work up to age 65, while simultaneously taking more money from their salary every month for 'contributions'.. all kinda mad thing i reading, that article on the last page say they want to take 'contributions' from housewives and disabled people every month. I donno how people not reacting to these taunts, they telling we different and new and innovative ways to dig out we eye as if is a good thing. i know is tiredness, exhaustion, maybe some idiots really believe the lies, i know all that the minimum wage worker and below living wage worker have to deal with, but come nah, somebody need to make some noise because closed mouths don't get fed. people need to start acting out.
it have a solution to all this. the solution is there but people need to be brave and demand from the government what they deserve. collective action, union, protest, riot, and yes even voting tho that is less important since politicians lie like water. closed mouths don't get fed, if we want a pension we have to take it with force if necessary from the owners of the economy.
the character of the economy is not the same as it was when nis was first created. what we seeing a gap between the 1% and the 99% that widening every year and has been widening every year before. the money to pay for the pensions does exist, it right there, and it does not exist in the pockets of minimum wage workers, housewives and the disabled, the target victims of the so-called 'contribution schemes' money to be taken out from minimum wage and below living wage salaries.
now here me, all this bullchit they tsaking about taking more 'contributions' from poor people salary still not going to fix the problem. it just going to kick the can down the road, create more hardships, maybe giwwe a next decade, but this system, in the way the economy is set up, is bound to fail and cause severe pain by trying to squeeze more money and more money from the people least able to pay it.
now when that collapse happens, and it wills ha;pen, here is what going to happen- demands on government pension claims will increase and the state will have to pay for it. we could see that. I say we take infront, before more hardships are created. nationalize all the assets, stop taking from workers making below a living wage, dismantle the arcane bureaucracy, tax corporate profits, tax the factory owners, tax the bankers and the capitalists, to provide a universal basic income for all workers on retirement
paid_influencer wrote:i been thinking about dis thing where they want workers to work up to age 65, while simultaneously taking more money from their salary every month for 'contributions'.. all kinda mad thing i reading, that article on the last page say they want to take 'contributions' from housewives and disabled people every month. I donno how people not reacting to these taunts, they telling we different and new and innovative ways to dig out we eye as if is a good thing. i know is tiredness, exhaustion, maybe some idiots really believe the lies, i know all that the minimum wage worker and below living wage worker have to deal with, but come nah, somebody need to make some noise because closed mouths don't get fed. people need to start acting out.
it have a solution to all this. the solution is there but people need to be brave and demand from the government what they deserve. collective action, union, protest, riot, and yes even voting tho that is less important since politicians lie like water. closed mouths don't get fed, if we want a pension we have to take it with force if necessary from the owners of the economy.
the character of the economy is not the same as it was when nis was first created. what we seeing a gap between the 1% and the 99% that widening every year and has been widening every year before. the money to pay for the pensions does exist, it right there, and it does not exist in the pockets of minimum wage workers, housewives and the disabled, the target victims of the so-called 'contribution schemes' money to be taken out from minimum wage and below living wage salaries.
now here me, all this bullchit they tsaking about taking more 'contributions' from poor people salary still not going to fix the problem. it just going to kick the can down the road, create more hardships, maybe giwwe a next decade, but this system, in the way the economy is set up, is bound to fail and cause severe pain by trying to squeeze more money and more money from the people least able to pay it.
now when that collapse happens, and it wills ha;pen, here is what going to happen- demands on government pension claims will increase and the state will have to pay for it. we could see that. I say we take infront, before more hardships are created. nationalize all the assets, stop taking from workers making below a living wage, dismantle the arcane bureaucracy, tax corporate profits, tax the factory owners, tax the bankers and the capitalists, to provide a universal basic income for all workers on retirement
That is not going happen the African mind is locked in slavery.88sins wrote:paid_influencer wrote:i been thinking about dis thing where they want workers to work up to age 65, while simultaneously taking more money from their salary every month for 'contributions'.. all kinda mad thing i reading, that article on the last page say they want to take 'contributions' from housewives and disabled people every month. I donno how people not reacting to these taunts, they telling we different and new and innovative ways to dig out we eye as if is a good thing. i know is tiredness, exhaustion, maybe some idiots really believe the lies, i know all that the minimum wage worker and below living wage worker have to deal with, but come nah, somebody need to make some noise because closed mouths don't get fed. people need to start acting out.
it have a solution to all this. the solution is there but people need to be brave and demand from the government what they deserve. collective action, union, protest, riot, and yes even voting tho that is less important since politicians lie like water. closed mouths don't get fed, if we want a pension we have to take it with force if necessary from the owners of the economy.
the character of the economy is not the same as it was when nis was first created. what we seeing a gap between the 1% and the 99% that widening every year and has been widening every year before. the money to pay for the pensions does exist, it right there, and it does not exist in the pockets of minimum wage workers, housewives and the disabled, the target victims of the so-called 'contribution schemes' money to be taken out from minimum wage and below living wage salaries.
now here me, all this bullchit they tsaking about taking more 'contributions' from poor people salary still not going to fix the problem. it just going to kick the can down the road, create more hardships, maybe giwwe a next decade, but this system, in the way the economy is set up, is bound to fail and cause severe pain by trying to squeeze more money and more money from the people least able to pay it.
now when that collapse happens, and it wills ha;pen, here is what going to happen- demands on government pension claims will increase and the state will have to pay for it. we could see that. I say we take infront, before more hardships are created. nationalize all the assets, stop taking from workers making below a living wage, dismantle the arcane bureaucracy, tax corporate profits, tax the factory owners, tax the bankers and the capitalists, to provide a universal basic income for all workers on retirement
The mindset of local politicians, is that if you not in their circles you deserve nothing. They see you akin to a beast of burden, your purpose is to work all your years and eventually drop down dead, and do so quietly and out of eyesight and earshot.
People really don't like to believe it, but the fact still is that NIS is a state-run Ponzi scheme, and the irony is the same state saying Ponzi schemes are criminal.
Our problem here, is the people are cowardly and lazy. You can do them ANYTHING, and they will just bend over and take it up the tailpipe, because that has less personal risk and effort involved. Couple that with the fact that regardless of demographic data, we are still a very divided people even to this day. So badly divided along ethnic groups, that its used against them, and many cannot see it happening in front their eyes, and so focused on the divide they not realizing that what politicians doing affects everyone.
I said this before, and I will say it again. The time will come when the people will rise up in civil disobedience, most likely when things get so bad that the majority can't feed or house or care for their families. But by then it go be too late.
That's a winner for sure but it have some dodoheads in this place. You feed, clothed and shelter them, improve their quality and standard of living and they still say you bad, you teef, you drunk. This nation's downfall is primarily due to the mindset of its citizens. The head of office merely adds fuel to those fire(s).mero wrote:Inb4 Kamla goes on the podium and announces nis pension going up to $5000 once elected
And so it should, but it was abused under the red mis government bad investments of NIS money paid by workers.mero wrote:Inb4 Kamla goes on the podium and announces nis pension going up to $5000 once elected
Red mis government peoplePremchand1976 wrote:That's a winner for sure but it have some dodoheads in this place. You feed, clothed and shelter them, improve their quality and standard of living and they still say you bad, you teef, you drunk. This nation's downfall is primarily due to the mindset of its citizens. The head of office merely adds fuel to those fire(s).mero wrote:Inb4 Kamla goes on the podium and announces nis pension going up to $5000 once elected
mero wrote:You can't and shouldn't just go on the podium and do announce things without discussing the board and it's actuaries.
Unc not important at this timemero wrote:Wrong. You know Kamla podium promising landed us in this situation right?
You can't and shouldn't just go on the podium and do announce things without discussing the board and it's actuaries. But I'm sure you know this zoom and stop playing dotish
After next election promises they gonna raise retirement to 75 lol
death365 wrote:Me na kno wha u get tha from but yuh rong.... like ah circle.
There was discussion and board approval
BTW since yuh na smatz enough ... yuh could send ah FOIA to get the information but yuh won't because....
KAMLA BAD !!!!!mero wrote:You can't and shouldn't just go on the podium and do announce things without discussing the board and it's actuaries.
Morning Zoom.zoom rader wrote:Unc not important at this timemero wrote:Wrong. You know Kamla podium promising landed us in this situation right?
You can't and shouldn't just go on the podium and do announce things without discussing the board and it's actuaries. But I'm sure you know this zoom and stop playing dotish
After next election promises they gonna raise retirement to 75 lol
Ur slave master Rowlee is
Nothing is voluntary under the red mis government.death365 wrote:ah hearing demi-God our greatest Finance Minister aka they aint roit yet Imbert said something yesterday wrt the age of 65 being " voluntary" ???
death365 wrote:ah hearing demi-God our greatest Finance Minister aka they aint roit yet Imbert said something yesterday wrt the age of 65 being " voluntary" ???
Just think red mis government ppl have been abusing NIS for years in bad deals.88sins wrote:death365 wrote:ah hearing demi-God our greatest Finance Minister aka they aint roit yet Imbert said something yesterday wrt the age of 65 being " voluntary" ???
yuh mean dummy-god and minister of fine ants.
It was always "voluntary", there's been provision allowing for people who so desire, to continue working and paying contributions past 60 and to retire at 65, and it's been that way for over 30 years iirc.
What these parasites want to do, is make it mandatory that you must work and pay till 65, so they get another 5 years worth of contributions, while simultaneously potentially reducing the total payout.
pugboy wrote:it’s a great idea
you can voluntarily stop work at 60
then wash windscreen by the lights for 5 years until 65 when you can then qualify to get pension
Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot], matr1x and 87 guests