Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
pugboy wrote:there's not much the chairman can do apart from a tongue lashing though
so they will just takes their licks and drag on
killercow wrote:Actually it's quite the opposite. Attorneys representing companies / individuals in 'tight spots' usually utilise this tactic frequently so as to add pressure to the opposing side and possibly give a slight edge to themselves as there is much less time to peruse all the evidence / paperwork in detail.The_Honourable wrote:pugboy wrote:Paris get a serious tongue lashing from the chairman today for sending a pile of docs over weekend after months of requests
Imagine Paria have months to prepare but submitting documents a few hours before the sitting.
Slackness.
maj. tom wrote:I glad the chairman didn't let this fly. It's a typical tactic for lawyers who feel they oversmart.
Now the chairman knows something is up for sure with Paria and I hope that they are pressed harder.
This is my question. Isn't osh tt supposed to step in, put a lock on the gate, kick everybody out and halt all operations until their investigation has been concluded??Val wrote:maj. tom wrote:I glad the chairman didn't let this fly. It's a typical tactic for lawyers who feel they oversmart.
Now the chairman knows something is up for sure with Paria and I hope that they are pressed harder.
Doesn’t matter in the end game, as this is just a COE and not trial.
Consider: Paria is still operating (even at a reported loss, for whatever reason). If they were fined, wouldn’t taxpayers likely foot the bill for that and any bailout?
LMCS is not. I would be surprised if Christopher Boodram can ever work as a diver again.
TTCG is unphased.
The lawyers are ALL colleagues, at the end of the day it comes down to individual morality and empathy if any justice at all is to be served.
Then consider the track record of corruption and injustice in the country. I feel like we set up ourselves for the COE to funnel more taxes into places it should not go.
hover11 wrote:What are the repercussions for lying under oath in a commission of enquiry, it's not a court of law and it is blatantly happening so why are we wasting taxpayers money in these type of things if no one is going to be held accountable
hover11 wrote:What are the repercussions for lying under oath in a commission of enquiry, it's not a court of law and it is blatantly happening so why are we wasting taxpayers money in these type of things if no one is going to be held accountable
Very true.16 cycles wrote:Piper made a pretty profound opinion...if you were the father stuck in the pipe, would you want someone to send your son to come in and rescue you without knowing all of the risks associated with that rescue...?
Duane 3NE 2NR wrote:I think the court of public opinion already made up its mind before the CoE and even more so during
hover11 wrote:Trinis are the same ppl that have a seven day memory,most studying WC right now than what happening in their own country...executives in suits much like politicians know this all too well.
toyolink wrote:There are many things in this COE which makes a expectation for neutrality to seem absent.
The tragic circumstances and the loss of lives has overwhelmingly lead to a 'human' need to have someone or some entity 'guilty' of maybe manslaughter and I can't help but wonder if this human desire wouldn't taint the outcome as far as gathering the facts.
Having had some experience in the industry and dealing with loss of life and property, what is instructive to note is that incidents are normally because of human error and in fact globally since Piper Alpha the oil and gas industry has been trying to invent, develop and install automated systems and operational procedures to address catastropic incidents, all to reduce and or mitigate the impact of same.
Thus far what is striking about the circumstances surrounding the work being done and activities following the event is the absence of cohesive effort by the parties, in fact both Paria and LMCS seemed to operating from diametrically conflicting positions.Tenets of best practise never accomodates the emotional urge to take risks and the lack of focused communication for execution of an urgent life threatening risk can only lead to failure and associated pain, loss and suffering.
Unfortunately, this story is in the most part not unlike the details surrounding similar instances both locally and abroad and any reading of findings on instances such as this will demonstrate same.
I certainly look forward to the findings of the COE and more importantly for me is what is being done for the families and loved ones of the lost soldiers. May they find peaceful rest.
Now here are my thoughts after reading this...The_Honourable wrote:While Colin Piper's point is valid that he stopped any diving until information comes in stating that it is safe to do a rescue, he fails to understand that all the assessing he was doing ended up wasting the first precious hours since the accident leading to the demise of the divers.