Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
Type Rated wrote:st7 wrote:Type Rated wrote:WhatsApp Image 2021-09-26 at 4.25.30 PM.jpeg
is this affiliated with the MoH?
No it isn’t. This is an independent project.
redmanjp wrote:De Dragon wrote:Bonus of not having the hovers and chaoses with their unvaxxed selves around you in a nice restaurant
he might be coming with a fake vax card
Not vaccinated and refuse such so that answers your questionStrugglerzinc wrote:redmanjp wrote:De Dragon wrote:Bonus of not having the hovers and chaoses with their unvaxxed selves around you in a nice restaurant
he might be coming with a fake vax card
It might not be fake. He probably get vaxed long time and just enjoying the attention here.
Funny, never asked you to Believe meStrugglerzinc wrote:Yeah man, sure. We believe you *wink wink*. No vaccine for you, just your fake card.
redmanjp wrote:Type Rated wrote:st7 wrote:Type Rated wrote:WhatsApp Image 2021-09-26 at 4.25.30 PM.jpeg
is this affiliated with the MoH?
No it isn’t. This is an independent project.
but MOH may have to approve? not so? where do u suppose it will be used? the official 'safe zones' will have to use whatever the Govt implements.
j.o.e wrote:redmanjp wrote:Type Rated wrote:st7 wrote:Type Rated wrote:WhatsApp Image 2021-09-26 at 4.25.30 PM.jpeg
is this affiliated with the MoH?
No it isn’t. This is an independent project.
but MOH may have to approve? not so? where do u suppose it will be used? the official 'safe zones' will have to use whatever the Govt implements.
If they can get acceptance and heavy usage businesses will be fine with it. Depends on how they push the idea out. This is the only place I’ve heard about it so hopefully they can push the word out. Acceptance of it as valid is the most important part. I signed up for it to test, so we’ll see. Stuart young said the govt version was 4-6 weeks away, with government red tape that sounds like 3 months plus.
st7 wrote:j.o.e wrote:redmanjp wrote:Type Rated wrote:st7 wrote:Type Rated wrote:WhatsApp Image 2021-09-26 at 4.25.30 PM.jpeg
is this affiliated with the MoH?
No it isn’t. This is an independent project.
but MOH may have to approve? not so? where do u suppose it will be used? the official 'safe zones' will have to use whatever the Govt implements.
If they can get acceptance and heavy usage businesses will be fine with it. Depends on how they push the idea out. This is the only place I’ve heard about it so hopefully they can push the word out. Acceptance of it as valid is the most important part. I signed up for it to test, so we’ll see. Stuart young said the govt version was 4-6 weeks away, with government red tape that sounds like 3 months plus.
i haven't perused the website fully yet, but i'm hoping to see how they combat fake vax cards.
Without MoH buy-in, there can be no third-party information sharing. Many vax-pass apps are just a way to upload your information to keep it with you.j.o.e wrote:st7 wrote:j.o.e wrote:redmanjp wrote:Type Rated wrote:st7 wrote:Type Rated wrote:WhatsApp Image 2021-09-26 at 4.25.30 PM.jpeg
is this affiliated with the MoH?
No it isn’t. This is an independent project.
but MOH may have to approve? not so? where do u suppose it will be used? the official 'safe zones' will have to use whatever the Govt implements.
If they can get acceptance and heavy usage businesses will be fine with it. Depends on how they push the idea out. This is the only place I’ve heard about it so hopefully they can push the word out. Acceptance of it as valid is the most important part. I signed up for it to test, so we’ll see. Stuart young said the govt version was 4-6 weeks away, with government red tape that sounds like 3 months plus.
i haven't perused the website fully yet, but i'm hoping to see how they combat fake vax cards.
Based on the info requested I suspect they are verifying against the MOH database. Other than providing photo evidence of the card you need to manually put in type of vax and date of doses.
j.o.e wrote:st7 wrote:j.o.e wrote:redmanjp wrote:Type Rated wrote:st7 wrote:Type Rated wrote:WhatsApp Image 2021-09-26 at 4.25.30 PM.jpeg
is this affiliated with the MoH?
No it isn’t. This is an independent project.
but MOH may have to approve? not so? where do u suppose it will be used? the official 'safe zones' will have to use whatever the Govt implements.
If they can get acceptance and heavy usage businesses will be fine with it. Depends on how they push the idea out. This is the only place I’ve heard about it so hopefully they can push the word out. Acceptance of it as valid is the most important part. I signed up for it to test, so we’ll see. Stuart young said the govt version was 4-6 weeks away, with government red tape that sounds like 3 months plus.
i haven't perused the website fully yet, but i'm hoping to see how they combat fake vax cards.
Based on the info requested I suspect they are verifying against the MOH database. Other than providing photo evidence of the card you need to manually put in type of vax and date of doses.
Type Rated wrote:The prime minister announced safe zones before the government has a system. He said in the same press conference the onus is on the business owner to ensure patrons are vaccinated. Stuart Young says the government system is 4-6 weeks away. According to what he says people vaccinated abroad may either have to upload to the govt system or be left out. My initiative covers this it's a 3rd party verification storage facility that will be way more accessible than a QR code system. The QR code on my band drive the user to the website but the unique code is a generated alphanumeric code so all the user needs to do is memorize it. We are working with safe zone businesses as it will add confidence and make conducting business easier.
redmanjp wrote:Type Rated wrote:The prime minister announced safe zones before the government has a system. He said in the same press conference the onus is on the business owner to ensure patrons are vaccinated. Stuart Young says the government system is 4-6 weeks away. According to what he says people vaccinated abroad may either have to upload to the govt system or be left out. My initiative covers this it's a 3rd party verification storage facility that will be way more accessible than a QR code system. The QR code on my band drive the user to the website but the unique code is a generated alphanumeric code so all the user needs to do is memorize it. We are working with safe zone businesses as it will add confidence and make conducting business easier.
but what about verification with MOH? their system will likely have that which is why they are doing calls to persons who are vaxxed. without that someone could just make up something and apply for your qr code
Kenjo wrote:De Dragon wrote:Bonus of not having the hovers and chaoses with their unvaxxed selves around you in a nice restaurant
The bigger advantage is not having to hear them rave about it
Type Rated wrote:How can MOH validate someone vaccinated abroad. In other countries Canada for instance people have to apply and input their data anyway. As a 3rd party entity we can only validate the actual cards themselves plus a true and correct declaration. If someone takes the band once we are contacted that band is voided and the code is changed however the only info they will have access to is the person's picture, DOB, and their vaccination dates vaccine type, and any other optional medical related info ie blood type, conditions.
The big difference is I am ready now. We have done the work to research and set the system up. But I believe I improved on the existing system. Showing you are vaccinated makes a statement. This is an easy way to do the same and allow for you to access safe zones quicker and easier
INHUMAN wrote:Open up d damn place...let natural immunity rise up and mother nature take its course. *Thanos liked this comment*
The UNC release said, “Functioning at 50 per cent capacity, out of a population pool of 42 per cent vaccinated, means that only 21 per cent of the population is permitted to patronise these businesses at any point in time.
redmanjp wrote:where kamla get her maths from?
https://newsday.co.tt/2021/10/04/kamla- ... d-to-fail/The UNC release said, “Functioning at 50 per cent capacity, out of a population pool of 42 per cent vaccinated, means that only 21 per cent of the population is permitted to patronise these businesses at any point in time.
is 50% of the premises capacity not 50% of the vaxxed population
redmanjp wrote:where kamla get her maths from?
https://newsday.co.tt/2021/10/04/kamla- ... d-to-fail/The UNC release said, “Functioning at 50 per cent capacity, out of a population pool of 42 per cent vaccinated, means that only 21 per cent of the population is permitted to patronise these businesses at any point in time.
is 50% of the premises capacity not 50% of the vaxxed population
daring dragoon wrote:redmanjp wrote:where kamla get her maths from?
https://newsday.co.tt/2021/10/04/kamla- ... d-to-fail/The UNC release said, “Functioning at 50 per cent capacity, out of a population pool of 42 per cent vaccinated, means that only 21 per cent of the population is permitted to patronise these businesses at any point in time.
is 50% of the premises capacity not 50% of the vaxxed population
yes but in the end the big picture will be 50% of the vaxxed population. if 100% can get into the safe zone but the safe zone operating at 50% then only 50% of the population can get in at any time. come nah think big not small and one sided.
if you and 3 members of your family go kfc and it already 50% full ent you will get 100% blanked. if 2 persons come out only 50% of your family can get in.
Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 78 guests