Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
phaze wrote:Lots of reading and information. Currently doing all my upgrades myself and hoping to do my own tuning....we have built pc computers using the double din in vehicles, a 7" touchscreen monitor and a home built pc that's small enough to fit under a car seat in a case with fans to cool. The idea was to have a "car pc" that had many other additional functions besides OBD connection for logging, playing music, watching movies, rearview camera, gps, we had all those functional. tuning was the next step without the need for a laptop. Even had ideas of additional sensors on the car for rain sensors unlocking the vehicle and such. With a car pc the options are limitless....just an idea whilst you setup your screen for logging. Not too mention limitless USB connections.
16 cycles wrote:nice @ FP stuff....in for the updates on that...
16 cycles wrote:nice @ FP stuff....in for the updates on that...
side note - is there a way on the wrx/sti ecus to set the CEL light to blink after 'x' amounts on knock?
I've seen on other platform the CEL would blink slow for >3 counts of knock and very fast for >10 counts...akin to a warning light once knock over a certain threshold is detected...
16 cycles wrote:that 007 map seems lovely - alot of area under the graph...
thanks for sharing !
Lance wrote:His estimates regarding the increase in cylinder pressure vs timing advance is very interesting. Many people tend to underestimate the implications of 1-2 degs of aditional timing.
The power trade of between EWG VTA vs Recir dump is also very interesting.
Nice post.
Lance wrote:
Untouched tune for 2 years. This was the map I flashed on my car just before I left the country. I left in a hurry and forgot to even set the rpm/load ranges.
It seems to have held up reasonably well over the 24month period.
My father changed a few parts over the period and the tune needed to be adjusted to compensate. I assumed that the modifications would have minimal effect on the tune/safety so I left it as is.
The fuel trims are off a bit. I used to be within the +/- 5% range. I attribute the increased variance to the FMIC I had installed a year ago . Without any modifications to the tune the turbo would have spooled up slower and it might have thrown off my a/f ratios (i.e richer). Hence the cuts on the trims.
I also installed an HKS catback which replaced my 3" mid pipe/ stock axel back hybrid (about 2 months ago). I'm now experiencing slight over boost from my target boost of 20psi. I'd probably attribute this to the free-er flowing exhaust. It's still safe on the a/f side even after the over boost so I won't address this until after the turbo swap.
16 cycles wrote:glad to hear everything went in and thanks for the heads up on fitment if anyone else might be going that route....good luck with the tuning....
Media Graphics Ltd. wrote:how does daily driving DS compare to MAF based fueling?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest