sub comparison

ShaKarz · Postby **ShaKarz** » November 14th, 2006, 1:56 pm

this thread has gone beyond its limits wrt d comparison but we established on page 1 all 3 subs can be used for either SPL or SQ cuz they both fit in each category esp the brutus and sqx.
they r all middle line subs from each brand

thank you for your input casper but after owning, researching n hearing all 3 subs being compared your reply doesnt make much sense too me... newayz without further debate lets forget it for now, after more testing n listening we can get some updates

casper · Postby **casper** » November 14th, 2006, 2:38 pm

yea wahever....buh anyways wasnt this comparison between ah spl3000 (a more spl sub)and a sqx(a more sq sub)???.......i dunno bout d brutus buh i didnt include dat in my comparison because you started off with the spl3000 an d sqx.....well if yuh ent find my reply makes sense den i dunno how else to put it nah boy.....bess u do yuh research den come an tell us wat u think after because u asked a question.....i jus gave my opinion ....and now you saying wat i said doh make any sense and dat how u already did research and u heard all play already....soooooo.....my opinion now to u is if you already have an answer den you shouldnt have any question to ask....because u will believe dat what you already know is the correct answer....and den dat will jus cause unwanted arguments....not debates....

fuzz_174 · Postby **fuzz_174** » November 14th, 2006, 5:21 pm

ShaKarz · Postby **ShaKarz** » November 14th, 2006, 8:24 pm

take win casper... ah done :shock:

audiopipe · Postby **audiopipe** » November 15th, 2006, 11:38 pm

believe me d brutus will fit in dat comparison
ask d man with d broken rear view mirror

Postby **2NR Smurf** » November 15th, 2006, 11:52 pm

just because it have "sq" in the name doesnt make it a sq product eh....that sqx sub was way too harsh for sq imho. :!:

ShaKarz · Postby **ShaKarz** » November 16th, 2006, 1:28 am

^^they say on the website it can be used in a SQ application SiR - i too beleive tho its a bit harse for that class... y u doh try 1 n tell we?

audiopipe wrote:believe me d brutus will fit in dat comparison
ask d man with d broken rear view mirror

boi doh talk dem thin here na... ah screw it up back nice n neat :mrgreen:

Postby **2NR Smurf** » November 16th, 2006, 1:57 am

SaLt ShaKer wrote:^^they say on the website it can be used in a SQ application SiR - i too beleive tho its a bit harse for that class... y u doh try 1 n tell we?

I did....

ShaKarz · Postby **ShaKarz** » November 16th, 2006, 2:31 am

^^it drown out ya mids/highs or wah?

maybe u needed to upgrade ya comps to match... jk :fadein:

s0 after all ur saying it does fit in a some what 'spl' class... which was my initial point....

fuzz_174 · Postby **fuzz_174** » November 16th, 2006, 3:01 pm

i heard the Sqx 10" in SR's car...

it sounded okayish...

was rumbly and boomy for the low notes...

The DLS sub he had before was alot smoother than it..

Postby **2NR Smurf** » November 16th, 2006, 3:03 pm

^The Iridium or the MW110?

Postby SR » November 16th, 2006, 3:08 pm

i had both and they both sounded better than the sqx

low bass response was more accurate and smoother

the sqx tends to be a bit loud with more energy geared to between 50hz and 60hz