Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
silent_riot wrote:I think he was referring to your comment about the age of Nathan's car and the effect of the car's age on the score.
SR wrote:I judged all rookie and amateuer classes
jeff wrote:yep that was the first thing i saw, nathan's score
anyone have a pic of the hertz pickup?
SR wrote:I judged all rookie and amateuer classes
nathan's car has been showing its age for the last 2 years now and he knows that but is not ready to commit to a new rebuild as yet
scott's score is only that high based on install pts s he took advantage of the install rules for 2010 which was unlimited
from 2011 there is now a cap
louis vehicle was one of the best sounding for the show
there was a vw bug that was very impressive on staging and imaging
the lone trini screwed up with first time jitters and lost his settings on the deck and only realised after he was judged by 2 different judges
listend to his car a week after and there was much improvement he would have moved up at least 4 places
evolution7tt wrote:How is it possible to get such low SQ scores? For the guys that placed in the lower halves of the standings in Pro/Am and especially that Expert competitor.
Major blunders on the day?
Lance wrote:I honestly do not think that wear on the speakers would really explain his scores. These guys are heavily sponsored...They don't pay retail for stuff nor do they have to put up with wore out speakers just because they can't afford new ones.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests